For the Words of God are PURE Why I'm KING JAMES ONLY
Psalms 12:6
“The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.”
King James Version (KJV)
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/01/let-us-examine-ourselves-gospel-kjv.html
https://x.com/JustX_Official/status/1949691206050439421
Thank you X Great Space and in response to your findings on the Vaticanus here is my research over the years:
Scholars like Samuel Gipp, Gail Riplinger, and William Grady, including my work with Dr. Hinton - linguist ancient Hebrew and Greek Harvard School of Divinity - all who are prominent King James Version advocates, argue that Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus are flawed Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted by heretical influences. Originating from Alexandria, Egypt—a hub of Gnosticism and Arianism—they cite Origen's alterations, which omit key phrases affirming Christ's deity, virgin birth, and atonement (e.g., over 3,000 differences between the two codices, with Vaticanus omitting 2,877 words in the Gospels compared to the Textus Receptus). These minority texts (representing only 5% of manuscripts) were rejected by early Christians, preserved unused due to defects, unlike widely circulated Byzantine copies.
They assert the Textus Receptus, compiled by Erasmus from majority Byzantine manuscripts, is superior as God's providentially preserved Word, underpinning Reformation Bibles and maintaining doctrinal integrity without omissions. Erasmus accessed Vaticanus readings but rejected them as corrupt.
Contrary to claims, Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are not older; early Church Fathers quote Textus Receptus readings pre-4th century, Gipp, Grady, Riplinger, and Hinton have studied this and have provided scholarship that prove the Sinaiticus is a 19th-century forgery by Constantine Simonides, fabricated to undermine traditional texts. The Textus Receptus reflects apostolic purity, outdating the Alexandrian corruption.
Please research how 2 Cambridge Theologians
Wescott and Hort commissioned by the Vatican promoted the Vanticus and Sinaiticus. 1880s... VATICAN - -.Vaticanus from a monastery in Alexandria.
-
Modern Bibles use these corrupted sources.
All of our modern day Seminaries, Schools of Divinity and Bible Colleges are apostate. I had a front row seat examining this allegation. My friend Dr. Hinton told me that all of his Harvard Divinity professors were either Agnostic or Atheist. He claims he would never be able to complete a thesis after he himself was saved. My son’s first semester of Christology at a prominent Theological Seminary was both heretical and blasphemous. All of these schools immediately demote the King James Bible and refer to NASB or ESV which come from corrupted manuscripts from the Vaticus and Sinaticus.
I urge you to do the research. I have included my findings and why the KING JAMES BIBLE is the FINAL AUTHORITY OF God’s word in this Blog which also includes the Gospel, Godhead and how to rightly divide scripture.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/01/let-us-examine-ourselves-gospel-kjv.html
Just look at the end results: Compare and contrast the KJV with NASB ESV and even the NKJV with critical scriptures of doctrine like the fundamentals of FAITH. Colossians 2:16,17. Also ask why the KJV uses both Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit, or why Charity in 1 Corinthians 13, and on and on. We have been told the KJV is archaic, but honestly ask yourself what has happened to culture and language from Handel to Rap.
Here is a very alarming scripture comparison: Confusing Lucifer with Jesus Christ. Compare Isaiah 14:12 KJV - Revelation 22:16 KJV with other versions.
Or the very WORD of God. Compare Psalm 12:6 and 7 - 2 Timothy 3:16 with KJV and modern versions.
And of course, always beware of using AI to find theological scholarship. Although AI can be a useful tool in bible study as the lexicons, it can also lead someone down a rabbit hole. We of course know AI draws theological scholarship from the ‘conventional wisdom’ of modern theologians trained in our apostate seminaries. Same with today’s pastors in the Laodicean Church. AI will draw information from writings by theologians like Thomas Aquinas, Ibn Sina, or modern scholars like Karen Armstrong. Adding are Philosophical discussions on theology, ethics, and metaphysics from sources like encyclopedias, journals, and forums.Diverse perspectives from different cultures, denominations, and viewpoints to ensure broad coverage.
Comments
Post a Comment