The Lord REBUKE YOU CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS God will not be Mocked National Zionist Israel in DERISION

Psalms
Chapter 2

—

1Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

2The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,

3Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

4He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

5Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.

6Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

7I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

8Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

9Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

10Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

11Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

12Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

https://x.com/LazurdaXotchitl/status/1943135522987384955

 https://x.com/AndrewTHTravel/status/1943305974829248729

Why am I using Psalm 2 as a doctrinally sound REBUKE of National Israel of today?

This scripture describes the REBELLION OF "EARTHLY" UNGODLY NATIONS AND RULERS AGAINST GOD AND HIS ANOINTED = JESUS CHRIST. 

100%  of Christian ZIONISTS actually DO NOT understand Psalm 2 KJB in the context of an UNREPENTANT STIFF NECKED  People and especially those who have hijacked these people and call themselves JEWS but are  NOT.

Ezekiel 36–37 and 1948:The 1948 establishment of Israel aligns with some aspects of Ezekiel 36–37 (regathering, land restoration), HOWEVER...  the prophecy’s MEANING AND FULL SCOPE —spiritual renewal, tribal reunification, and a Messianic kingdom—points to a future Millennial fulfillment. 

Misquoting these chapters to claim 1948 as the sole fulfillment risks missing their eschatological intent.

Corollary to King Solomon a type of AntiChrist Study by Quandra Crawford

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/07/corollary-to-king-solomon-type-of.html

National ZIONIST Israel in Derision Tel Aviv Live video

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/06/httpsx.html

God Is Not Mocked: The Lord Rebuke Amir Tsarfati BEHOLD ISRAEL in

 Derision #doctrinematters

https://youtu.be/IImggMhMYsU?si=oUWIg4cIx1qaHxtp

Why King Solomon matters:  

He represented the perfect type and shadow of the AC and brought Israel from a "people of God" to a NATION of the world:

Biblical Evidence from the King James VersionThe primary sources in the KJV are 1 Kings 1–11 and 2 Chronicles 1–9, which detail Solomon’s reign (circa 970–930 BCE). Below are the key passages and their significance:

1. Centralized Governance and Administration:
   • 1 Kings 4:1, 7 (KJV): “So king Solomon was king over all Israel… And Solomon had twelve officers over all Israel, which provided victuals for the king and his household: each man his month in a year made provision.”
     • Significance: This describes Solomon’s division of Israel into 12 administrative districts, each with a governor responsible for supplying the royal court. This system reflects a shift from the tribal confederation of earlier periods (e.g., under the judges or Saul) to a centralized state with a bureaucratic structure for taxation and resource management.
   • 2 Chronicles 8:7–10 (KJV): “As for all the people that were left of the Hittites, and the Amorites… them did Solomon make to pay tribute until this day… And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.”
     • Significance: Solomon’s use of forced labor from non-Israelite populations and his maintenance of a large chariot force indicate a state-controlled workforce and military, hallmarks of a centralized monarchy.
2. Economic Prosperity and Trade:
   • 1 Kings 9:26–28 (KJV): “And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber… And they came to Ophir, and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents, and brought it to king Solomon.”
     • Significance: Solomon’s establishment of a fleet at Ezion-geber (a Red Sea port) and trade with Ophir (possibly in South Arabia or East Africa) demonstrate a state-driven economy with international reach, facilitated by alliances with Phoenicia (Hiram of Tyre, 1 Kings 5:1–12).
   • 1 Kings 10:14–15, 22 (KJV): “Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold, Beside that he had of the merchantmen, and of the traffick of the spice merchants, and of all the kings of Arabia… For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish with the navy of Hiram.”
     • Significance: Solomon’s wealth from trade and tribute from vassal states (e.g., Arabia) underscores a centralized economy capable of funding large-scale projects and sustaining a royal court.
3. Religious Centralization and the Temple:
   • 1 Kings 6:1–2, 7:51–8:11 (KJV): “And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt… that he began to build the house of the LORD… So was ended all the work that king Solomon made for the house of the LORD.”
     • Significance: The construction of the Temple in Jerusalem centralized worship, unifying the tribes under a single religious and political capital. The Temple’s completion and the transfer of the Ark of the Covenant (1 Kings 8:6) solidified Jerusalem’s status as the spiritual and administrative heart of Israel.
   • 2 Chronicles 7:1–5 (KJV): “Now when Solomon had made an end of praying, the fire came down from heaven… And king Solomon offered a sacrifice of twenty and two thousand oxen, and an hundred and twenty thousand sheep.”
     • Significance: The grand dedication of the Temple reflects Solomon’s role in establishing a national religious identity, reinforcing his authority as God’s chosen king.
4. Diplomatic and International Influence:
   • 1 Kings 10:1–10 (KJV): “And when the queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon concerning the name of the LORD, she came to prove him with hard questions… And she said to the king, It was a true report that I heard in mine own land of thy acts and of thy wisdom.”
     • Significance: The visit of the Queen of Sheba (likely from modern Yemen or Ethiopia) highlights Solomon’s international reputation and diplomatic alliances, indicative of a strong, centralized state capable of projecting influence abroad.

Historical and Archaeological EvidenceWhile the biblical account provides a detailed narrative, historical and archaeological evidence for Solomon’s reign is less direct, as no contemporary inscriptions explicitly name Solomon. However, several findings and historical contexts support the biblical portrayal of a centralized Israelite state under his rule:

1. Archaeological Evidence of Urbanization and Fortifications:
   • Gezer, Hazor, and Megiddo: 1 Kings 9:15 (KJV) states, “And this is the reason of the levy which king Solomon raised; for to build the house of the LORD, and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer.” Excavations at these sites reveal 10th-century BCE fortifications, including six-chambered gates and casemate walls, often attributed to Solomon’s building projects.
     • Example: At Megiddo, a six-chambered gate and palace complex dated to the 10th century BCE suggest significant state investment in infrastructure, consistent with a centralized monarchy.
   • Jerusalem’s Millo: The “Millo” (1 Kings 9:15) may refer to a stepped-stone structure or terrace system uncovered in the City of David, indicating urban expansion under a centralized authority.
2. Economic and Trade Networks:
   • Ezion-geber and Red Sea Trade: Archaeological evidence from Tel el-Kheleifeh (possibly Ezion-geber) shows 10th-century BCE copper smelting and trade activity, supporting the biblical account of Solomon’s Red Sea trade (1 Kings 9:26–28).
   • Phoenician Alliance: The alliance with Hiram of Tyre (1 Kings 5:1–12) is plausible, as Phoenician inscriptions and artifacts from the period confirm Tyre’s role as a major trade hub, likely supplying cedar for Solomon’s projects.
3. Regional Context:
   • The 10th century BCE was a period of relative stability in the Levant, with weakened Egyptian and Mesopotamian powers, allowing smaller states like Israel to flourish. The Amarna Letters (14th century BCE) and later Assyrian records (e.g., the Mesha Stele, 9th century BCE) confirm the existence of organized states in the region, supporting the plausibility of a centralized Israel under Solomon.
   • The absence of major invasions during Solomon’s reign (1 Kings 4:21, 24) aligns with a period of prosperity and state-building.
4. Challenges and Debates:
   • Minimalist vs. Maximalist Views: Some scholars (minimalists) argue that the biblical account exaggerates Solomon’s wealth and influence, citing limited direct archaeological evidence. Others (maximalists) point to sites like Megiddo and Hazor as consistent with the biblical narrative.
   • Lack of Inscriptions: No contemporary inscriptions explicitly mention Solomon or his kingdom, which is not unusual for the period, as few written records survive from 10th-century Canaan.
   • Tel Dan Stele: This 9th-century BCE inscription mentions the “House of David,” providing indirect evidence of a Davidic dynasty, which supports the existence of a centralized state under Solomon, David’s successor.

SynthesisThe KJV biblical texts (1 Kings 1–11, 2 Chronicles 1–9) portray Solomon as transforming Israel into a nationalized state through:

• A centralized administrative system (12 districts, governors).
• Economic prosperity via trade and tribute (Ophir, Sheba, Phoenicia).
• Religious unification through the Jerusalem Temple.
• Diplomatic influence and military strength (chariots, alliances).

Historical and archaeological evidence, while not directly naming Solomon, supports this picture through 10th-century BCE fortifications, trade networks, and regional stability. Sites like Megiddo, Hazor, and Gezer, along with evidence of copper trade and Phoenician connections, align with the biblical description of a centralized state.