Manna - Leaven; The Paradigm of False Teachers
Lest
Satan should get an advantage of us; for we are not ignorant of his devices. 2
Corinthians 2:11 KJV
Worthy
Is the Lamb. The King of Kings, and the Lord of Lords. Jesus our Lord and
Savior.
To the God of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob. All the Glory and Honor Forever Amen!
The
Lord Spoke the “Truth” From the “Beginning”. Although, the great “I AM’ always
was.
1.
WE ARE COMMANDED TO FOLLOW THE TRUTH!!
2. AND TO CORRECT THOSE WHO ARE IN ERROR!!
1.
The “ TRUTH”
2.
2nd Timothy 3:16-17
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for
doctrine, for reproof, for Correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good
works.
The
Importance of understanding the difference between Manna and Leaven is
extremely important!!!
Why? Because of wolves
in sheep clothings.
A) 1
Peter 5:8
Be
sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion,
walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:
Please Read: Who are the Nicolaitans:
Jesus and I Hate the Deeds of the Nicolaitans (thethirdheaventraveler.com)
B)
2nd Corinthians 2:11
Lest
Sa’-tan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices.
MANNA/leaven
Manna
means to prepare, because it was food prepared from heaven for the Israelites
in the wilderness. Manna is also represented by Jesus Christ
Leaven
is not prepared by God, but rather from decay. After the fall of man when sin
entered the world so did death and decay, the process leading to death.
Leaven is an active, literally working ingredient, an enzyme (see meaning
of enzyme in footnotes) that decays - breaks down - mitigates by sedation -
changes to make more pleasing, soothing - to sugar - ferment into alcohol
(see meaning of fermentation in footnotes.) that is produced from decay. New
Bible translations stemming from Greek Text from Alexandria are completely
tainted from the Vatican text Latin Vulgate attempt to translate Leaven
as a good thing as in lifting something up as in yeast makes things rise.
See
Footnote Below on Understanding from God’s word the Importance knowing the
meaning and purpose of Manna - the very Bread of Life Jesus Christ- and the
meaning and evil purpose of Leaven. To understand that Manna comes from God to
feed His children and Leaven is used as a grievous and most treacherous tool of
Satan. obtained by usurping his position over mankind and the world after the
fall.
This
study is based on the authority of God's word. The King James Version Bible
translation. See footnotes below regarding reasons why Bible translations do
matter.
Today
most, if not all of Bible Scholars and Theologians use corrupted Bible
Translations to sprinkle in their leaven.
In every current modern (since 1960’s) Bible study we've seen, the Bible teacher is using corrupted Bible translations and perverting twisted interpretations ensue.
EndNotes:
Manna:
Manna
MAN'NA,
n.
1.
A substance miraculously furnished as food for the Israelites in their journey
through the wilderness of Arabia. Exodus Chapter 16
General
references
Exodus 16:4-35; Numbers 11:6-10; Deuteronomy 8:3; Deuteronomy 8:16; Joshua
5:12; Nehemiah 9:20; Psalms 78:24; John 6:31; John 6:49; John 6:58
Preserved
in the ark of the testimony
Exodus 16:33; Hebrews 9:4
Figurative
John 6:48-51; 1 Corinthians 10:3; Revelation 2:17
Christ
the True Manna
“This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof,
and not die.” John 6:50
“To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna,” Revelation
2:17
.
Christ, and the graces of Christ, are called Manna.
Manna
means to prepare, because it was food prepared from heaven for the Israelites
in the wilderness.
http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/article/11690
Leaven
What is it?
Enzyme:
enzyme (n.) means Leaven which is a substance that causes fermentation which is
process of chemical alteration. Fermentation literally means to rot or
spoil. Fermentation is a metabolic process that consumes sugar in the absence
of oxygen. The products are organic acids, gases, or alcohol. It occurs in
yeast and bacteria, and also in oxygen-starved muscle cells, as in the case of
lactic acid fermentation. The science of fermentation is known as zymology.
1881, as a biochemical term, from German Enzym, coined 1878 by German
physiologist Wilhelm KĂĽhne (1837-1900), from Modern Greek enzymos
"leavened," from en "in" (see en- (2)) + zyme
"leaven" (see zymurgy). Related: Enzymotic.
zymurgy - branch of chemistry which deals with wine-making and brewing, 1868,
from Greek zymo-, combining form of zyme "a leaven" (from PIE root
*yeue-; see juice) + -ourgia "a working," from ergon "work"
(from PIE root *werg- "to do" Also literally meaning to Work.
Research meaning further to verify.
What
is the meaning of Leaven in the Bible:
Leaven
= Deception
Sun
Tzu wrote that, “All warfare is based on deception.” Deception is Satan’s
finest tool, he used in the garden of Eden and has been using it ever since.
Jesus Christ tells us that Satan is a Liar, the Father of Lies and he
only comes to kill, steal, and destroy. We are also told that Satan also
comes as an angel of light. Genesis 3:14; John 8:42-45; John 10:10; 2
Corinthians 11:14... All said, Deception is used to commit war on the Saints.
To
fully understand that God considered Leaven to be evil look at Leviticus
chapter 2, Exodus 12:8; 34:18; Deuteronomy 16:3 when he commanded the
Israelites not to use leaven and in detail to eat Unleavened Bread at Passover.
In the New Testament the most powerful testimony against Leaven and how it is
working in this present church age is Matthew 13:33.
Matthew
13:33 KJV reads as follows: Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of
heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of
meal, till the whole was leavened.”
In
making a powerful illustration of how Jesus taught us of these end times using
Leaven to bring in the end. we take a quote from “The Coming Kingdom” by Dr.
Andrew Woods pgs 128-124.
Please
NOTE: We had to issue a strong reprove warning Dr. Woods that his work,
although well written and strong defender of the truth exposing many false
teachers out there, we found that he was using a perverted Bible translation
the NASB which in doing so caused him needless grief in trying to explain and
defend his positions. It was also quite embarrassing for a Phd to make such
errors in their presentation. We found the greatest irony was in the
midst of presenting his case for leaven is a sign of the evil prevailing in our
current age, he was in fact sprinkling in his own leaven and especially in his
work trying to explain Luke 17:20,21 and contradicting great theologians of
old.
What’s
happening here is without doubt, all new pastors, teachers, Bible scholars and
Theologians are coming out of their institutions with tainted fruit and are in
fact spouting heresy. This apostate corruption is right out of the Bible
warning of last days.
The
Lesson here is to be a good Berean to read and check and test all against
scripture. Do not take anyone’s word without backing up every word with the
Word of God which is the King James Bible.
Begin
quote from The Coming Kingdom. Parable of the Leaven:
“The
following The Parable of the Leaven Christ gave the Parable of the Leaven in
Matthew 13:33. This verse says, “He spoke another parable to them, ‘The kingdom
of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three pecks of flour
until it was all leavened.’” Perhaps more than any of the other parables found
in Matthew 13, this parable is used by kingdom now theologians to teach that
the kingdom is a present, spiritual reality. They interpret the yeast as the
progress of the kingdom in the present world. Unfortunately numerous
commentators miss the clear import of Christ’s teaching in the Parable of the
Leaven (Matt. 13:33) by interpreting the leaven as something good rather than
bad. Notice popular pastor John MacArthur’s interpretation of Matthew 13:33.
The first point is that small things can have great influence. . . . The second
point . . . is that the influence is positive. . . . When the kingdom of heaven
is faithfully reflected in the lives of believers, its influence in the world
is both pervasive and positive. The life of Christ within believers is
spiritual and moral leavening in the world. . . . To the average person of
Jesus’ day, Jew or Gentile, there is no evidence that leaven carried any
connotation of evil or corruption. . . . To take this leaven as representing
evil that permeates the kingdom is to twist the obvious meaning and
construction of words.13 Elsewhere, MacArthur notes: Here the kingdom is
pictured as yeast, multiplying quietly and permeating all that it contacts. The
lesson is the same as the parable of the mustard seed. Some interpreters
suggested since leaven is nearly always a symbol of evil in Scripture. . . . It
must carry that connotation here as well. They make the leaven some evil
influence inside the kingdom. But that twists Jesus’ actual words and violates
the context, in which Jesus is repeatedly describing the kingdom itself as
their pervading influence.14 Concerning MacArthur’s interpretation, George
Zeller appropriately notes: MacArthur’s interpretation is not far away from
that of the postmillennial reconstructionist who also would understand the
leaven as being used in a good sense and indicating the growth of the kingdom
of heaven by means of the penetrating power of the gospel ultimately leading to
the conversion of the world.15 Yet, when the yeast is properly understood as
something pernicious rather than something that is good, an exact opposite
interpretation is provided. Pink provides seven clues for properly interpreting
the Parable of the Leaven. The popular interpretation of this parable regards
the “leaven” as representing the Gospel and its power, the “woman” the Church.
Here are the words of Dr. John Gill: “Leaven is everywhere else used in a bad
sense . . . here it seems to be taken in a good sense, and the Gospel to be
compared unto it.” The “woman,” he tells us, is “the church” or the ministers
of the Gospel. . . . 1. If the popular view is correct then, in this chapter,
Christ flatly contradicts Himself. What He has said in the first three parables
is dead against world-conversion or even world-reformation by means of Gospel
preaching. . . . 2. The post-millennial interpretation of this parable is
flatly contradicted by what we are told in verses 11, 35 of Matthew 13. There
we learn that these parables are “mysteries of the kingdom of heaven,” “things
which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.” . . . the Gospel
was not an unrevealed secret in O. T. times. Galatians 3:8 declares that the
Gospel was “preached unto Abraham.” . . . 3. If the “leaven” represents the
Gospel and the “meal” the human race, or, as Dr. Gill teaches, God’s elect in
their natural condition then the figure which Christ here employed is a faulty
one. And this in three different respects. First, in the way it works. How does
“leaven” act? Why, it is simply placed in meal, and then it works of itself!
That is all: just place it there, leave it alone, and it is bound to leaven the
whole lump. But is that the way the Gospel works? Certainly not. Multitudes
have received the Gospel, but it has had no effect upon them! . . . Second, in
the actor here mentioned. It is a “woman” who places the leaven in the meal.
But the Lord Jesus Christ has not committed His Gospel into the hands of women.
There were none among the twelve, nor among the seventy whom he chose and sent
forth. The preaching of the Gospel is a man’s job. . . . Third, in the effects
it produces. When leaven is placed into meal it causes it to swell, it puffs it
up! Is that what the Gospel does when it enters human hearts? No indeed. It
produces the very opposite effect. It humbles, it abases. 4. The popular
interpretation is contradicted by the plain facts of history and by present-day
experience. . . . The Gospel has now been preached for nineteen centuries, yet
not a single nation or state, no, nor even city, town or village, has been
completely evangelized—let alone won to Christ! If the popular view is the
correct one, then the Gospel is a colossal and tragic failure. 5. To make the
“leaven” a figure of the Gospel and its power, of that which is good, is to
contradict every other passage in Scripture where this figure is used. Christ
was speaking to a Jewish audience, and with their knowledge of the O. T.
Scriptures none of them would ever dream that He had reference to something
that was good. With the Jews “leaven” was ever a figure of evil. The first time
that “leaven,” in its negative form, occurs in the Bible is in Genesis 19:3,
where we are told that Lot “did bake un-leavened bread” for the angels, and
that “they did eat.” No doubt leavened bread was a common commodity in the
wicked city of Sodom. . . . In Exodus 12 it will be found that Jehovah
commanded the Israelites to rigidly purge their houses of all “leaven” at the
Passover season. Why was this if “leaven” is a type of that which is good?
Exodus 34:25 tells us that God prohibited any “leaven” from accompanying
offerings of blood. Leviticus 2:11 informs us that “leaven” was also excluded
from every offering of the Lord made by fire. This parable in Matthew 13 is not
the only occasion when the Lord Jesus employed this figure. How did He use it
elsewhere? In Matthew 16:11 we find Him saying to the disciples, “Beware of the
leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees.” There, it is plainly a figure of
that which is evil. So in Luke 12:1 He said, “Beware ye of the leaven of the
Pharisees which is hypocrisy.” Would He then deliberately confuse His disciples
by using it as the figure of good in Matthew 13? The Holy Spirit has also used
this same figure through the apostle Paul. In what manner? In 1 Corinthians
5:6, 7 we read, “Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump.” Would they be
told to “purge out” that which was good? The last passage in the N. T. in which
“leaven” is mentioned is Galatians 5:7–9. Note there three things: first, it is
called “a persuasion”—something which exerts a powerful and moving influence.
Second, it hinders men “from obeying the truth.” Third, it is expressly said to
be “not from Him which calleth you.” Thus, that which is a thing of
fermentation—really, incipient putrefaction—is, throughout Scripture, uniformly
a figure of corruption—evil. It is remarkable that the word “leaven” occurs
just thirteen times in the N. T., a number always associated with evil and the
work of Satan. 6. Let us now consider the “three measures of meal.”
Post-millennarians say that they represent the human race among whom the Gospel
is working. If so, the “meal” is a figure of that which is evil. The human race
is fallen, sinful, depraved; “the whole world lies in the Wicked one” (1 John
5:19). . . . “And Abram hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said, Make ready
quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth”
(Gen. 18:6). Did Abraham prepare for the Lord and His angels food out of that
which symbolized evil? Note what is said in 1 Kings 17:14–16. God does not feed
His servants on that which speaks of evil! Now where does “meal” for bread come
from? Any child can answer: not from evil tares, but from good wheat. It is the
product of the good Seed. Then that which is good, wholesome, nutritious, pure,
can never be a figure of fallen and corrupt humanity. In Genesis 18:6 the
“three measures of meal” are a figure of Christ’s person, just as the “tender
calf” in verse 7 which was killed and dressed prefigured His work. The meal is
a type of Him who is the Corn of wheat (John 12:24) and the Bread of life. And
thus in the language of N. T. symbolry the “meal” stands for the doctrine of
Christ. 7. The action of the “woman” in our parable exposes the error of the
common interpretation. She “took,” not “received;” and hid the leaven in the
meal. Is this the way in which the servants of God preach His Gospel? Is the
evangel something to be whispered in secret? Does God bid His servants act
stealthily? No. The Lord has said to them, “What I tell you in darkness, that
speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the
housetop” (Matthew 11:27). Writing to the Corinthians, and describing the
character of his own ministry, the apostle Paul said, “We faint not, but have
renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor
handling the Word of God deceitfully, but by manifestation of the truth
commending ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God” (2 Cor.
4:2). But in our parable, the woman is acting dishonestly and deceitfully: she
stealthily introduced a foreign and corrupting element into the meal. Her object
was to effect its deterioration. If the reader will turn to Leviticus 2:11 he
will find that this “woman” was doing the very thing which the Word of God
forbade her; and he will also observe that she left out the oil, which was the
very thing the Scriptures enjoined! . . . The “leaven” symbolizes the
corrupting of God’s truth by the introduction of evil doctrine—compare Matthew
16:12.16 Pink’s understanding of the leaven working its way through the dough
as representing something evil rather than something good is consistent with
the interpretation provided by other respected scholars. As previously noted,
both Walvoord and Toussaint interpret the leaven in a negative sense. Thus, far
from teaching the growth of the kingdom, the Parable of the Leaven, like the
previous Parable of the Mustard Seed, is actually a parable concerning the
progress of evil in the present age.”
Bible
Translations do matter:
Examples
of major modern bible translation errors
Examples
of modern Bible errors
https://youtu.be/_DL5aYOj0F0
http://christianitybeliefs.org/end-times-deceptions/kj-niv-esv-modern-bible-deception-verse-comparison-studyhttp://christianitybeliefs.org/end-times-deceptions/kj-niv-esv-modern-bible-deception-verse-comparison-study
https://jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NLT/nlt_exposed.htm
https://jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NLT/nlt_exposed.htm
How
Satan and his ministers use the Bible
https://youtu.be/EpZ7chF4TT0
https://youtu.be/EpZ7chF4TT0
This
following link here below is most deceitful and tricky. A
https://bible.org/article/lucifer-devil-isaiah-1412-kjv-argument-against-modern-translationhttps://bible.org/article/lucifer-devil-isaiah-1412-kjv-argument-against-modern-translations
s
They
know good bereans with the KJV see the errors of corrupt translations but say
the Latin Septuagint translation (A Vatican Translation) actually agrees with
modern Translation. The Septuagint changes Hebrew and original Alexandria
Greek vs Antioch see link Understanding Bible Translations. Ask any Reprobate
who defends the Textus Vaticanus Codex Vaticanus Sinairus Alexandrian
Manuscripts Latin Septuagint why there Hundreds of major flaws example John
7:53-8:16 omitted, etc.
The
Lord’s Holy Word is like Manna. It’s good for the soul, and will lead you to
the Father through Christ Jesus, and eternity in heaven.
Satan
is a Liar and a sneek. He’s truly a snake like he was in the garden.
Satan can’t by nature create anything. And his leaven is toxic poison for the
soul, and will lead you to death and hell.
Before
we watch, read, and listen to anyone about Jesus and His Holy Word we must:
PRAY!! Pray, that we will understand what is going on.
The reason is this: Satan wants to slither in and poison good fruit.
Whether
intentional or unintentional: folks are putting YouTube Videos, letters,
sermons, blogs, and books mixing the “Truth” with the lie.
Comments
Post a Comment