Near-Death Experiences, Visions & False Prophets: A Biblical Warning
Near Death Experiences, Private Visions, and False Prophets: A Biblical Warning
Essential Study Links:
This study was inspired by my brother in Christ, Cameron Moshfegh, who brought to my attention a group of popular Near Death Experience (NDE) testimonies circulating on YouTube, especially those of Howard Pittman, Mark Nelson, Bryan (Brian) Melvin, and John Ramirez (with Vlad Savchuk).
I. The Biblical Pattern of Prophecy vs. Private Visions
Before dealing with any NDE or “heaven/hell tour,” I must establish from the Bible what a prophet and prophecy are.
1. What a Prophet Is
A true prophet is an oracle of God – an authorized messenger speaking God’s words, not his own:
Deuteronomy 18:18 – God puts His words in the prophet’s mouth; the prophet speaks all that God commands.
Jeremiah 1:9 – “I have put my words in thy mouth.”
Numbers 12:6; Amos 3:7; Ezekiel 3:17; 2 Chronicles 20:20; Exodus 7:1 – God reveals His secret to His servants the prophets and makes Himself known in visions and dreams.
1. The Nature of His Claim
Pittman presents his experience as:
A literal journey through the “second heaven” (demonic realm) and then into the presence of God.
2. Major Doctrinal Problems
From my review of his materials and transcripts:
He never clearly preaches the gospel of 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 KJV – the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ for our sins, received by faith apart from works as the ground of eternal salvation.
He never clearly explains the true church of Philadelphia in contrast to Laodicea (Revelation 3). He uses the Laodicean church heavily, yet he does not rightly divide between this present dispensation and the tribulation period, and he confuses tribulation Scriptures with current church truth.
At timestamp 29:07 he says Satan is anointed, a statement that is at best highly misleading and at worst a perverse glorification of the enemy, without a sound biblical explanation of what “anointed” would even mean in that context.
He teaches a distorted doctrine of the baptism of the Holy Spirit, abusing Matthew 3 by ripping “He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire” from its context. He asserts that the real evidence of Spirit baptism is “fire” burning the chaff out of Christians through tribulation, rather than the Spirit’s sealing and indwelling at conversion (1 Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 1:13–14).
He claims that only 2.5% of people (or Christians) are actually saved – yet he nowhere provides a biblical doctrinal basis for this number. This is neither rooted in clear Scripture nor subject to the Deuteronomy 18 test; it is pure private revelation.
By contrast, when I speak about how few are truly saved, I at least tie my estimate (for example, 4.5%) to the parable of the sower in Matthew 13. Whether one agrees with my exact calculation or not, I build it from Scripture. Pittman offers no such exegesis; he simply reports a number allegedly shown to him in the unseen realm.
3. Works‑Based Undertones and Another Gospel
Perhaps the most serious issue is his implicit challenge to eternal security and his works‑colored emphasis. He opens by questioning or heavily implying that many who believe in eternal security are deceived. He stresses a message of “true repentance,” “placebo Christianity,” and “tribulation fire” in a way that suggests salvation depends on my performance, spiritual intensity, or surviving refining fire – rather than on Christ’s finished work alone.
This places him under the warning of Galatians 1:8–9. Any message, even “from an angel from heaven,” that alters the gospel of grace into a works‑tinged, fear‑based, performance‑driven system is another gospel and accursed. In my blog, I have documented many such cases in previous studies exposing false prophets and teachers.
4. Failing the Prophetic Tests
When I apply the biblical tests:
Source Test – His 5‑point message and 2.5% statistic come from a private, unverifiable NDE, not from the public, written Word of God. This is exactly the “vision of their own heart” condemned in Jeremiah 23 and Ezekiel 13.
Accuracy / Verifiability Test – His claims about percentages and end‑time dynamics are not subject to clear, testable fulfillment, which makes them presumptuous under Deuteronomy 18:20–22.
Christ/Gospel Test – He does not clearly preach 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 as the sufficiency of salvation, but surrounds the gospel with works, fear, and extra‑biblical revelation.
Doctrinal Alignment Test – He confuses Matthew 3, misinterprets “Holy Ghost and fire,” and mangles tribulation passages into the current church dispensation without proper context. I address these misuses in my blog studies on understanding prophecy and rightly dividing Scripture.
Fruit Test – The result of his message is fear, confusion, and preoccupation with his experience, not with Christ crucified and risen.
For these reasons, I must reject Howard Pittman’s NDE “message” as false prophetic content, even if he personally is sincere. Sincerity does not excuse error when a man claims to speak on God’s behalf.
III. Mark Nelson: Sentimental Story, Doctrinal Confusion
Mark Nelson’s NDE is often praised as “the most biblically sound” of the four, but when I examine it against Scripture, serious problems appear.
1. Outrageous Claims Without Doctrinal Grounding
Nelson’s story is dramatic and emotionally powerful, yet when it comes to doctrine:
He does not clearly preach the gospel of 1 Corinthians 15:1–4. I hear no robust explanation of justification by faith, the finished work of Christ, and assurance grounded in Christ alone.
He makes outrageous claims about his experience, heavenly conversations, and spiritual insight that are nowhere grounded in sound exegesis. The Bible is used as a backdrop, not as the controlling authority.
2. Exalting Billy and Franklin Graham
Nelson lifts up Billy Graham and Franklin Graham as spiritual exemplars. Whatever good they may have done in certain areas, they also represent broad, ecumenical, decisionistic, and often muddled gospel presentations. Elevating them uncritically reveals Nelson’s theological orientation: mainstream evangelicalism with all its doctrinal compromises. I have addressed these issues with modern evangelicalism in other blog studies.
3. Failure of the Tests
Applying the same tests:
Source – His theology is drawn as much from cultural evangelical heroes and sentimentalism as from Scripture.
Gospel – The cross and resurrection are not expounded in a clear, Pauline way; instead I see story‑driven moral exhortation.
Doctrinal Alignment – By exalting compromised celebrity evangelists and not rightly dividing Scripture, he leads the listener to trust in a muddled gospel ecosystem rather than the pure message of grace.
Nelson’s testimony may have emotional appeal, but I cannot treat it as safe doctrinal teaching, and I certainly cannot receive it as any kind of prophetic authority for the church.
IV. Bryan (Brian) Melvin: Story‑Time Speculation, Not Scripture
Bryan (Brian) Melvin’s testimonies about dying, seeing “every level of hell,” and later receiving a “tour of heaven” sound more like a fantasy series than sober biblical exposition.
1. A Narrative That “Goes Off the Rails”
As I have observed, Melvin’s dream/story “goes off the rails” into elaborate, cinematic descriptions that do not line up with Scripture:
Multi‑layered hell “levels” and detailed structures that owe more to Dante, pop religion, and imagination than to Luke 16 or Revelation.
A later “heaven tour” where he claims face‑to‑face meetings with Jesus and guided tours that again lack clear scriptural anchor.
Statements about “working to stay saved,” which betray confusion about salvation by grace alone.
Though he sometimes quotes verses like Psalm 40:1–3, these are used as decorations, not as the framework of his doctrine.
2. Doctrinal Confusion and Extra‑Biblical Revelation
His remark about “working to stay saved” contradicts Ephesians 2:8–9 and Galatians 2:16. That is a works‑salvation mindset, not the biblical gospel.
He affirms the Trinity, but wraps that affirmation inside a mystical, experience‑driven narrative full of subjective claims.
His extra‑biblical “tours” of hell and heaven add to Scripture – something the Bible repeatedly warns against, and which I expose in my blog study on false prophets and private revelations.
3. Failing the Tests
When I test Melvin’s content:
Source – His views of hell and heaven are largely private speculation and experience, not careful exegesis.
Gospel – “Working to stay saved” is another gospel.
Doctrinal Alignment – His picture of the afterlife goes beyond what is written, violating 1 Corinthians 4:6 and the spirit of Revelation 22:18–19.
Melvin’s stories may fascinate the flesh, but they are not safe teaching for the body of Christ.
V. John Ramirez (With Vlad Savchuk): Occult‑Flavored “Deliverance” and Another Gospel
John Ramirez markets himself as a former high‑ranking Satanist turned Christian evangelist and “deliverance” specialist. His interviews, including those with Vlad Savchuk, are especially disturbing to me.
1. Questionable Conversion Testimony
Although Ramirez claims to have been saved, his testimony:
Never clearly anchors salvation in the biblical gospel of 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 – Christ’s death for our sins, burial, and resurrection, received by faith alone.
Focuses heavily on sensational experiences, battles with demons, and dramatic manifestations.
Includes a disturbing detail: after he supposedly was saved, he spent several days being attacked and tormented by demons, instead of resting in the finished work of Christ and the believer’s secure position in Him.
This raises serious questions in my mind about whether he actually understands or believes the gospel Paul preached.
2. False Teachers He Endorses
Ramirez openly exalts David Wilkerson, a well‑known works‑based preacher who mixed law and gospel and who, in my judgment from Scripture, preached another gospel by adding performance and threat to the message of grace. Lifting up Wilkerson reveals Ramirez’s doctrinal home base: a legalistic, fear‑driven system, not Paul’s gospel of grace. I have dealt with Wilkerson’s errors in other blog studies.
3. Occult‑Colored Authority Claims
Throughout his interviews:
Ramirez claims divinely inspired messages and powers, presenting himself as a special authority on the “demonic realm” and “deliverance ministry.”
He claims a lost person cannot “sell their soul to the devil” because the soul belongs to Jesus. While there is a grain of truth in the sense that God is Creator and ultimate Owner, this statement is used in a way that obscures the real issue of spiritual deadness and unbelief.
He revels in sign‑seeking, tongues, and manifestations typical of the Pentecostal/charismatic movement, but without sober biblical restraint.
He continues to trade on his supposed past occult involvement as a form of spiritual capital, drawing people to himself and his brand of “deliverance,” rather than to the simplicity that is in Christ.
4. Failing the Tests
When I test his message:
Source – Much of his teaching comes from alleged supernatural experiences with demons and deliverance sessions, not from plain Scripture.
Gospel – By mixing works, Wilkerson‑style legalism, and charismatic manifestations, he does not present the pure gospel of grace.
Doctrinal Alignment – His doctrines of deliverance, demonic bondage, and ongoing torment after professed conversion contradict the believer’s position and security in Christ.
Fruit – The fruit is fear, obsession with demons, and dependence on a “deliverance specialist,” not resting in the finished work of Christ.
Given these issues, I must be honest: I see no clear evidence from their own words that Ramirez, or the others in this NDE cluster, truly understand and believe the gospel of grace. Their messages function as a mixture of experience, law, and sensationalism, not as a clear proclamation of Christ crucified and risen.
VI. Conclusion: I Choose the Scriptures Over NDE Storytellers
Across these four men – Pittman, Nelson, Melvin, and Ramirez – I see the same pattern:
Subjective experiences (NDEs, visions, dreams, occult encounters) are elevated above or alongside Scripture.
They effectively act as prophets, even when they do not take the title: “God told me…,” “Jesus showed me…,” “I went to heaven/hell and came back with a message.”
They preach either a muddled gospel or an outright works‑based “another gospel.”
They add detailed descriptions of the unseen world that cannot be tested by Deuteronomy 18, 1 John 4, or the full counsel of God.
The Bible commands me: “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1). True prophecy is received from God, aligns perfectly with Scripture, exalts Christ and His finished work, and passes the tests God Himself has given. Private NDE revelations, no matter how moving, do not carry that authority.
The safest path for me – and for any believer – is exactly what Paul modeled:
“For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2).
I must measure every NDE, every testimony, every “God told me” by the King James Bible, rightly divided. When the experience contradicts or goes beyond the written Word, I must throw out the experience and keep the Book – not the other way around.
These men all claim some form of supernatural encounter, vision, or NDE, and then proceed to give the church “messages” they say came from God.
The question is not whether they had some kind of intense experience. The question is: Do their messages line up with Scripture, or do they function as false prophecy – visions of their own heart – that must be rejected?
The Lord has already given us clear tests:
1 Corinthians 4:7 – What do I have that I did not receive? If something is not received from God, I cannot boast as though I originated it.
1 Corinthians 14:32 – “The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.” All alleged revelations must be subject to the already‑given prophetic Word, never placed above it.
2 Peter 1:20–21 – No prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation or the will of man; holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Jeremiah 23 and Ezekiel 13 – False prophets “speak a vision of their own heart” and say “The LORD saith” when He has not spoken.
Deuteronomy 18:20–22 – If someone presumes to speak in the LORD’s name, their words must prove true and consistent with God’s revelation, or they are not to be feared.
1 John 4:1–3 – I am commanded to “try the spirits” because many false prophets are gone out into the world. They must confess the true Christ and the true gospel.
With that framework, I can and must examine these NDE testimonies in the light of Scripture, and test whether they preach the biblical gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1–4, Galatians 2:16) or “another gospel” (Galatians 1:8–9).
The question is not whether they had some kind of intense experience. The question is: Do their messages line up with Scripture, or do they function as false prophecy – visions of their own heart – that must be rejected?
The Lord has already given us clear tests:
1 Corinthians 4:7 – What do I have that I did not receive? If something is not received from God, I cannot boast as though I originated it.
1 Corinthians 14:32 – “The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.” All alleged revelations must be subject to the already‑given prophetic Word, never placed above it.
2 Peter 1:20–21 – No prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation or the will of man; holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Jeremiah 23 and Ezekiel 13 – False prophets “speak a vision of their own heart” and say “The LORD saith” when He has not spoken.
Deuteronomy 18:20–22 – If someone presumes to speak in the LORD’s name, their words must prove true and consistent with God’s revelation, or they are not to be feared.
1 John 4:1–3 – I am commanded to “try the spirits” because many false prophets are gone out into the world. They must confess the true Christ and the true gospel.
With that framework, I can and must examine these NDE testimonies in the light of Scripture, and test whether they preach the biblical gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1–4, Galatians 2:16) or “another gospel” (Galatians 1:8–9).
I. The Biblical Pattern of Prophecy vs. Private Visions
Before dealing with any NDE or “heaven/hell tour,” I must establish from the Bible what a prophet and prophecy are.
1. What a Prophet Is
A true prophet is an oracle of God – an authorized messenger speaking God’s words, not his own:
Deuteronomy 18:18 – God puts His words in the prophet’s mouth; the prophet speaks all that God commands.
Jeremiah 1:9 – “I have put my words in thy mouth.”
Numbers 12:6; Amos 3:7; Ezekiel 3:17; 2 Chronicles 20:20; Exodus 7:1 – God reveals His secret to His servants the prophets and makes Himself known in visions and dreams.
ESSENTIAL NOTE: Again, in this dispensation a Prophet is SUBJECT to what is already written and established by God's word; i.e. subject to the Prophets. Otherwise it is a false prophecy given by a false Prophet.
The pattern is clear: God initiates; the prophet speaks what is received, not imagined. I develop this in detail in my blog study “Understanding Prophets.” See Essential Blog study link above.
The pattern is clear: God initiates; the prophet speaks what is received, not imagined. I develop this in detail in my blog study “Understanding Prophets.” See Essential Blog study link above.
2. How Prophecy Comes
2 Peter 1:21 – Prophecy did not come by the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
2 Peter 1:20 – No prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
1 Corinthians 14:29–32 – Prophets speak and others judge; the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. Prophetic speech is accountable and testable.
This exposes a core problem with many NDE testimonies today:
2 Peter 1:21 – Prophecy did not come by the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
2 Peter 1:20 – No prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
1 Corinthians 14:29–32 – Prophets speak and others judge; the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. Prophetic speech is accountable and testable.
This exposes a core problem with many NDE testimonies today:
they treat subjective experiences as authoritative revelation for the wider church, yet they cannot be tested or verified like Scripture.
I address this contrast more fully in my study “The Essential Meaning of Things.” See Essential Study links above
3. The Tests of a Prophet
From Deuteronomy 18, 1 John 4, Jeremiah 23, Ezekiel 13, Matthew 7, and Paul’s letters, I can summarize the biblical tests this way:
Source Test – Is the message truly received from God, or is it a “vision of their own heart” (Jeremiah 23:16; Ezekiel 13:2–3)?
Accuracy Test – If they speak in the LORD’s name, does it come to pass (Deuteronomy 18:20–22)?
Christ/Gospel Test – Does it confess the biblical Christ and the true gospel of grace, not works (1 John 4:1–3; 1 Corinthians 15:1–4; Galatians 1:8–9; Galatians 2:16)?
Doctrinal Alignment Test – Does it agree with prior revelation and apostolic doctrine (Deuteronomy 13:1–3; 1 Corinthians 4:6; 1 John 4:6)?
Fruit Test – Does it produce repentance and holiness, or vanity, confusion, and spiritual bondage (Matthew 7:15–20; Jeremiah 23:14–22)? See my study on FRUIT and BELIEVE in the Essential Study Links above.
Anyone who claims “God told me,” “Jesus showed me,” “I toured heaven/hell and came back with a message,” and then proceeds to give doctrinal instruction to the church is functioning as a prophet – whether they accept the title or deny it. They are therefore subject to these tests. I examine this functional definition further in my study “Understanding Ministers.” See in Essential study link above.
From Deuteronomy 18, 1 John 4, Jeremiah 23, Ezekiel 13, Matthew 7, and Paul’s letters, I can summarize the biblical tests this way:
Source Test – Is the message truly received from God, or is it a “vision of their own heart” (Jeremiah 23:16; Ezekiel 13:2–3)?
Accuracy Test – If they speak in the LORD’s name, does it come to pass (Deuteronomy 18:20–22)?
Christ/Gospel Test – Does it confess the biblical Christ and the true gospel of grace, not works (1 John 4:1–3; 1 Corinthians 15:1–4; Galatians 1:8–9; Galatians 2:16)?
Doctrinal Alignment Test – Does it agree with prior revelation and apostolic doctrine (Deuteronomy 13:1–3; 1 Corinthians 4:6; 1 John 4:6)?
Fruit Test – Does it produce repentance and holiness, or vanity, confusion, and spiritual bondage (Matthew 7:15–20; Jeremiah 23:14–22)? See my study on FRUIT and BELIEVE in the Essential Study Links above.
Anyone who claims “God told me,” “Jesus showed me,” “I toured heaven/hell and came back with a message,” and then proceeds to give doctrinal instruction to the church is functioning as a prophet – whether they accept the title or deny it. They are therefore subject to these tests. I examine this functional definition further in my study “Understanding Ministers.” See in Essential study link above.
II. Howard Pittman: The Most Subtle and Dangerous
Of the four men in this NDE group, I consider Howard Pittman the most dangerous. He is ordained, he sounds conservative, and he heavily uses Scripture while delivering a 5‑point “message to the church” that he claims God gave him during his NDE. He has been hosted by major platforms, including the 700 Club (CBN) in 1980 and interviews with false teacher Mark Cowart, which amplifies his influence.
Of the four men in this NDE group, I consider Howard Pittman the most dangerous. He is ordained, he sounds conservative, and he heavily uses Scripture while delivering a 5‑point “message to the church” that he claims God gave him during his NDE. He has been hosted by major platforms, including the 700 Club (CBN) in 1980 and interviews with false teacher Mark Cowart, which amplifies his influence.
1. The Nature of His Claim
Pittman presents his experience as:
A literal journey through the “second heaven” (demonic realm) and then into the presence of God.
Note: This really angered me through righteous indignation. Imagine this reprobate claiming to be before the thone of God and even Paul who was in the 3rd Heaven was not allowed to utter what he saw. Now regarding what we can claim is written by the REVELATION OF JESUS CHRIST as given to John in the Book of Revelation of Jesus Christ. PERIOD!
A direct audience with God where he is told his prior ministry was largely “placebo” Christianity.
A divine commission to take a five‑point message back to the church, including severe warnings and statistics about how few are truly saved.
This is prophetic authority. He is not merely giving a personal testimony; he is claiming to bear a message from God to the church.
A direct audience with God where he is told his prior ministry was largely “placebo” Christianity.
A divine commission to take a five‑point message back to the church, including severe warnings and statistics about how few are truly saved.
This is prophetic authority. He is not merely giving a personal testimony; he is claiming to bear a message from God to the church.
In my NDE study, I show that this is functionally indistinguishable from claiming the office of a prophet.
2. Major Doctrinal Problems
From my review of his materials and transcripts:
He never clearly preaches the gospel of 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 KJV – the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ for our sins, received by faith apart from works as the ground of eternal salvation.
He never clearly explains the true church of Philadelphia in contrast to Laodicea (Revelation 3). He uses the Laodicean church heavily, yet he does not rightly divide between this present dispensation and the tribulation period, and he confuses tribulation Scriptures with current church truth.
At timestamp 29:07 he says Satan is anointed, a statement that is at best highly misleading and at worst a perverse glorification of the enemy, without a sound biblical explanation of what “anointed” would even mean in that context.
He teaches a distorted doctrine of the baptism of the Holy Spirit, abusing Matthew 3 by ripping “He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire” from its context. He asserts that the real evidence of Spirit baptism is “fire” burning the chaff out of Christians through tribulation, rather than the Spirit’s sealing and indwelling at conversion (1 Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 1:13–14).
He claims that only 2.5% of people (or Christians) are actually saved – yet he nowhere provides a biblical doctrinal basis for this number. This is neither rooted in clear Scripture nor subject to the Deuteronomy 18 test; it is pure private revelation.
By contrast, when I speak about how few are truly saved, I at least tie my estimate (for example, 4.5%) to the parable of the sower in Matthew 13. Whether one agrees with my exact calculation or not, I build it from Scripture. Pittman offers no such exegesis; he simply reports a number allegedly shown to him in the unseen realm.
3. Works‑Based Undertones and Another Gospel
Perhaps the most serious issue is his implicit challenge to eternal security and his works‑colored emphasis. He opens by questioning or heavily implying that many who believe in eternal security are deceived. He stresses a message of “true repentance,” “placebo Christianity,” and “tribulation fire” in a way that suggests salvation depends on my performance, spiritual intensity, or surviving refining fire – rather than on Christ’s finished work alone.
This places him under the warning of Galatians 1:8–9. Any message, even “from an angel from heaven,” that alters the gospel of grace into a works‑tinged, fear‑based, performance‑driven system is another gospel and accursed. In my blog, I have documented many such cases in previous studies exposing false prophets and teachers.
4. Failing the Prophetic Tests
When I apply the biblical tests:
Source Test – His 5‑point message and 2.5% statistic come from a private, unverifiable NDE, not from the public, written Word of God. This is exactly the “vision of their own heart” condemned in Jeremiah 23 and Ezekiel 13.
Accuracy / Verifiability Test – His claims about percentages and end‑time dynamics are not subject to clear, testable fulfillment, which makes them presumptuous under Deuteronomy 18:20–22.
Christ/Gospel Test – He does not clearly preach 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 as the sufficiency of salvation, but surrounds the gospel with works, fear, and extra‑biblical revelation.
Doctrinal Alignment Test – He confuses Matthew 3, misinterprets “Holy Ghost and fire,” and mangles tribulation passages into the current church dispensation without proper context. I address these misuses in my blog studies on understanding prophecy and rightly dividing Scripture.
Fruit Test – The result of his message is fear, confusion, and preoccupation with his experience, not with Christ crucified and risen.
For these reasons, I must reject Howard Pittman’s NDE “message” as false prophetic content, even if he personally is sincere. Sincerity does not excuse error when a man claims to speak on God’s behalf.
III. Mark Nelson: Sentimental Story, Doctrinal Confusion
Mark Nelson’s NDE is often praised as “the most biblically sound” of the four, but when I examine it against Scripture, serious problems appear.
1. Outrageous Claims Without Doctrinal Grounding
Nelson’s story is dramatic and emotionally powerful, yet when it comes to doctrine:
He does not clearly preach the gospel of 1 Corinthians 15:1–4. I hear no robust explanation of justification by faith, the finished work of Christ, and assurance grounded in Christ alone.
He makes outrageous claims about his experience, heavenly conversations, and spiritual insight that are nowhere grounded in sound exegesis. The Bible is used as a backdrop, not as the controlling authority.
2. Exalting Billy and Franklin Graham
Nelson lifts up Billy Graham and Franklin Graham as spiritual exemplars. Whatever good they may have done in certain areas, they also represent broad, ecumenical, decisionistic, and often muddled gospel presentations. Elevating them uncritically reveals Nelson’s theological orientation: mainstream evangelicalism with all its doctrinal compromises. I have addressed these issues with modern evangelicalism in other blog studies.
3. Failure of the Tests
Applying the same tests:
Source – His theology is drawn as much from cultural evangelical heroes and sentimentalism as from Scripture.
Gospel – The cross and resurrection are not expounded in a clear, Pauline way; instead I see story‑driven moral exhortation.
Doctrinal Alignment – By exalting compromised celebrity evangelists and not rightly dividing Scripture, he leads the listener to trust in a muddled gospel ecosystem rather than the pure message of grace.
Nelson’s testimony may have emotional appeal, but I cannot treat it as safe doctrinal teaching, and I certainly cannot receive it as any kind of prophetic authority for the church.
IV. Bryan (Brian) Melvin: Story‑Time Speculation, Not Scripture
Bryan (Brian) Melvin’s testimonies about dying, seeing “every level of hell,” and later receiving a “tour of heaven” sound more like a fantasy series than sober biblical exposition.
1. A Narrative That “Goes Off the Rails”
As I have observed, Melvin’s dream/story “goes off the rails” into elaborate, cinematic descriptions that do not line up with Scripture:
Multi‑layered hell “levels” and detailed structures that owe more to Dante, pop religion, and imagination than to Luke 16 or Revelation.
A later “heaven tour” where he claims face‑to‑face meetings with Jesus and guided tours that again lack clear scriptural anchor.
Statements about “working to stay saved,” which betray confusion about salvation by grace alone.
Though he sometimes quotes verses like Psalm 40:1–3, these are used as decorations, not as the framework of his doctrine.
2. Doctrinal Confusion and Extra‑Biblical Revelation
His remark about “working to stay saved” contradicts Ephesians 2:8–9 and Galatians 2:16. That is a works‑salvation mindset, not the biblical gospel.
He affirms the Trinity, but wraps that affirmation inside a mystical, experience‑driven narrative full of subjective claims.
His extra‑biblical “tours” of hell and heaven add to Scripture – something the Bible repeatedly warns against, and which I expose in my blog study on false prophets and private revelations.
3. Failing the Tests
When I test Melvin’s content:
Source – His views of hell and heaven are largely private speculation and experience, not careful exegesis.
Gospel – “Working to stay saved” is another gospel.
Doctrinal Alignment – His picture of the afterlife goes beyond what is written, violating 1 Corinthians 4:6 and the spirit of Revelation 22:18–19.
Melvin’s stories may fascinate the flesh, but they are not safe teaching for the body of Christ.
V. John Ramirez (With Vlad Savchuk): Occult‑Flavored “Deliverance” and Another Gospel
John Ramirez markets himself as a former high‑ranking Satanist turned Christian evangelist and “deliverance” specialist. His interviews, including those with Vlad Savchuk, are especially disturbing to me.
1. Questionable Conversion Testimony
Although Ramirez claims to have been saved, his testimony:
Never clearly anchors salvation in the biblical gospel of 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 – Christ’s death for our sins, burial, and resurrection, received by faith alone.
Focuses heavily on sensational experiences, battles with demons, and dramatic manifestations.
Includes a disturbing detail: after he supposedly was saved, he spent several days being attacked and tormented by demons, instead of resting in the finished work of Christ and the believer’s secure position in Him.
This raises serious questions in my mind about whether he actually understands or believes the gospel Paul preached.
2. False Teachers He Endorses
Ramirez openly exalts David Wilkerson, a well‑known works‑based preacher who mixed law and gospel and who, in my judgment from Scripture, preached another gospel by adding performance and threat to the message of grace. Lifting up Wilkerson reveals Ramirez’s doctrinal home base: a legalistic, fear‑driven system, not Paul’s gospel of grace. I have dealt with Wilkerson’s errors in other blog studies.
3. Occult‑Colored Authority Claims
Throughout his interviews:
Ramirez claims divinely inspired messages and powers, presenting himself as a special authority on the “demonic realm” and “deliverance ministry.”
He claims a lost person cannot “sell their soul to the devil” because the soul belongs to Jesus. While there is a grain of truth in the sense that God is Creator and ultimate Owner, this statement is used in a way that obscures the real issue of spiritual deadness and unbelief.
He revels in sign‑seeking, tongues, and manifestations typical of the Pentecostal/charismatic movement, but without sober biblical restraint.
He continues to trade on his supposed past occult involvement as a form of spiritual capital, drawing people to himself and his brand of “deliverance,” rather than to the simplicity that is in Christ.
4. Failing the Tests
When I test his message:
Source – Much of his teaching comes from alleged supernatural experiences with demons and deliverance sessions, not from plain Scripture.
Gospel – By mixing works, Wilkerson‑style legalism, and charismatic manifestations, he does not present the pure gospel of grace.
Doctrinal Alignment – His doctrines of deliverance, demonic bondage, and ongoing torment after professed conversion contradict the believer’s position and security in Christ.
Fruit – The fruit is fear, obsession with demons, and dependence on a “deliverance specialist,” not resting in the finished work of Christ.
Given these issues, I must be honest: I see no clear evidence from their own words that Ramirez, or the others in this NDE cluster, truly understand and believe the gospel of grace. Their messages function as a mixture of experience, law, and sensationalism, not as a clear proclamation of Christ crucified and risen.
VI. Conclusion: I Choose the Scriptures Over NDE Storytellers
Across these four men – Pittman, Nelson, Melvin, and Ramirez – I see the same pattern:
Subjective experiences (NDEs, visions, dreams, occult encounters) are elevated above or alongside Scripture.
They effectively act as prophets, even when they do not take the title: “God told me…,” “Jesus showed me…,” “I went to heaven/hell and came back with a message.”
They preach either a muddled gospel or an outright works‑based “another gospel.”
They add detailed descriptions of the unseen world that cannot be tested by Deuteronomy 18, 1 John 4, or the full counsel of God.
The Bible commands me: “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1). True prophecy is received from God, aligns perfectly with Scripture, exalts Christ and His finished work, and passes the tests God Himself has given. Private NDE revelations, no matter how moving, do not carry that authority.
The safest path for me – and for any believer – is exactly what Paul modeled:
“For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2).
I must measure every NDE, every testimony, every “God told me” by the King James Bible, rightly divided. When the experience contradicts or goes beyond the written Word, I must throw out the experience and keep the Book – not the other way around.
Comments
Post a Comment