Why I'm back on Twitter X after a 10-year sabbatical using AI
Matthew 6:33
“But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.”
King James Version (KJV)
Luke 16:8
“And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.”
King James Version (KJV)
Why I'm returning to Twitter X after a 10 year break.
Twitter:
https://x.com/traveler_heaven
Matthew 6:33 in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. The verse says:
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you."
Jesus concludes: “for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” The point isn’t to praise dishonesty but to highlight how the steward’s worldly cunning outshines the often-lacking foresight of the righteous in using resources for eternal purposes. Jesus urges His followers to learn from such shrewdness, applying it to spiritual stewardship (Luke 16:9).
For the viewer that may not be aware of Paul's action in the book of Acts regarding on how we need to know how to use the World's System:
Paul, a Roman citizen by birth (Acts 22:28), faced intense opposition from Jewish leaders and certain Greeks due to his preaching of the Gospel, which disrupted their religious and economic interests.
"Orthodox Jews like Neturei Karta reject Zionism as un-Jewish, a secular push against divine will. Are Zionists, not their critics, the real threat to Judaism’s soul?"
Background Study:
IF you feel led by the Lord I encourage you to follow my X Twitter Account:
Twitter:
https://x.com/traveler_heaven
As most of my subscribers are aware, I left FB after being booted off for posting the Truth and then later when Twitter started clamping down on conservative and Biblical Blogs I left.
Note my Brother in Christ James Van Patten Jr. had well over 10K followers on Twitter and had powerful Christian Content but was removed for posting and exposing the Truth. And also observing the impact Brother James has had on FB even after being removed somehow he kept climbing back on.
Over the months I often pondered this.
Then...
A few days ago, I was urged in my spirit to return to Twitter X because of their now relatively better conditions of free speech (tongue in cheek) guidelines under Musk. Also what was very strong was reading in Acts whereby Paul knew of course the Roman Government was corrupt still used the Roman system wisely to both preserve his life from the Jews and even the Greeks who were losing money from his preaching. The overall scripture that kept reviewing in my mind was from Luke 16:8 KJB.
Disclaimer: WARING: I fully comprehend by God's GRACE that we are NOT "OF" this World, but rather "IN" this world.
By using this World's System would mean for us to use it for our end goal, self-serving purposes to enrich and establish our own agenda in this world. Please be clear in your understanding here... I am claiming to USE the System for the Kingdom of God and ALL of His Righteousness - Matthew 6:33 KJB who is Jesus Christ the KING OF KINGS and LORD of LORDS. AMEN! MARANATHA! AND NOT OUR OWN.
Matthew 6:33 in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. The verse says:
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you."
Luke 16:8 in summary:
Jesus concludes: “for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” The point isn’t to praise dishonesty but to highlight how the steward’s worldly cunning outshines the often-lacking foresight of the righteous in using resources for eternal purposes. Jesus urges His followers to learn from such shrewdness, applying it to spiritual stewardship (Luke 16:9).
Here's a short synopsis of Acts of the Apostles King James Bible:
For the viewer that may not be aware of Paul's action in the book of Acts regarding on how we need to know how to use the World's System:
Paul, a Roman citizen by birth (Acts 22:28), faced intense opposition from Jewish leaders and certain Greeks due to his preaching of the Gospel, which disrupted their religious and economic interests.
In Acts 19, Paul’s ministry in Ephesus led to a decline in the sale of idols, angering Greek silversmiths like Demetrius, who stirred a riot against him (Acts 19:23-29). Paul escaped harm by avoiding direct confrontation, and Roman intervention wasn’t explicitly needed here, but it set the stage for his reliance on Roman authority later.
In Jerusalem, Jewish leaders accused Paul of defiling the temple and sought to kill him (Acts 21:27-31). As a mob attacked him, Roman soldiers intervened, arresting Paul to restore order (Acts 21:32-36).
Before Felix, and later Festus, Paul defended himself against Jewish accusations (Acts 24:10-21, 25:8-11). When Festus proposed sending him back to Jerusalem—where Paul knew death awaited—he appealed to Caesar (Acts 25:11-12), a right of Roman citizens. This appeal ensured his transfer to Rome, safeguarding him from both Jewish plots and local Greek hostility tied to economic losses.
Thus, Paul strategically used his Roman citizenship and the empire’s legal system to escape death threats from Jews and economic backlash from Greeks, fulfilling his mission to spread the Gospel.
Here share short story of when the Communist Ward Boss interrogated me for handing out Bibles to my students. And how it was a blessing after I found out the Vietnamese translations were corrupted and I had to then use the KING JAMES BIBLE.
Post 2: "Orthodox Jews like Neturei Karta reject Zionism as un-Jewish, a secular push against divine will. Are Zionists, not their critics, the real threat to Judaism’s soul?"
Thread it, cite your research (e.g., a blog link), and avoid name-calling. This frames it as a debate, not a dunk, lowering ban risk while still landing your punch.
Biblical Green Light
If this is your "fight against darkness," 2 Timothy 4:2 could be your green light:
"Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine." (KJV)
It’s a call to boldly share truth, even when unpopular—fitting for your Zionism critique.
In Jerusalem, Jewish leaders accused Paul of defiling the temple and sought to kill him (Acts 21:27-31). As a mob attacked him, Roman soldiers intervened, arresting Paul to restore order (Acts 21:32-36).
When Paul revealed his Roman citizenship, the chief captain, Claudius Lysias, ensured his safety, preventing an unlawful scourging (Acts 22:24-29). Facing a Jewish plot to assassinate him (Acts 23:12-15), Paul’s nephew informed the Romans, prompting Lysias to transfer him under heavy guard to Governor Felix in Caesarea (Acts 23:23-35).
Before Felix, and later Festus, Paul defended himself against Jewish accusations (Acts 24:10-21, 25:8-11). When Festus proposed sending him back to Jerusalem—where Paul knew death awaited—he appealed to Caesar (Acts 25:11-12), a right of Roman citizens. This appeal ensured his transfer to Rome, safeguarding him from both Jewish plots and local Greek hostility tied to economic losses.
In Rome, under house arrest, Paul continued preaching (Acts 28:30-31), protected by Roman law.
Thus, Paul strategically used his Roman citizenship and the empire’s legal system to escape death threats from Jews and economic backlash from Greeks, fulfilling his mission to spread the Gospel.
I had also done a recent Blog on AI and how the enemy is of course using it and then I realized Paul's case and created my new account today.
Here share short story of when the Communist Ward Boss interrogated me for handing out Bibles to my students. And how it was a blessing after I found out the Vietnamese translations were corrupted and I had to then use the KING JAMES BIBLE.
My strategy:
GROK said it was safer so I'm back on X Twitter:
Testing the waters here on X is it now safe to post correctly researched material in truth content without being blocked or sent to twitter gulag
I assume you're asking about the safety of posting well-researched, truthful content on X (formerly Twitter) without facing consequences like being blocked or restricted—what some users jokingly call the "Twitter gulag" (a reference to account suspensions or shadowbans).
GROK said it was safer so I'm back on X Twitter:
Testing the waters here on X is it now safe to post correctly researched material in truth content without being blocked or sent to twitter gulag
I assume you're asking about the safety of posting well-researched, truthful content on X (formerly Twitter) without facing consequences like being blocked or restricted—what some users jokingly call the "Twitter gulag" (a reference to account suspensions or shadowbans).
Since I can search X posts and the web for insights, I’ll base my response on the current landscape as of March 8, 2025, while keeping in mind X’s evolving policies under Elon Musk’s ownership.
X’s environment has shifted since Musk took over in late 2022, with a stated goal of prioritizing free speech.
From what I’ve seen on X recently, people post researched, factual content—sometimes controversial—without immediate backlash, especially if it’s presented thoughtfully and avoids inflammatory framing.
Web chatter and X posts suggest a mixed bag, though. Some users claim they’ve been shadow banned (tweets hidden from search or throttled) for edgy but truthful takes, especially if they critique powerful interests. Others say well-sourced material flies fine unless it’s deliberately provocative.
So, is it "safe"? Probably safer than it was a few years ago for researched truth, assuming you’re not spamming or inciting harm. But it’s not risk-free—X’s enforcement can be opaque, and user reports can still flag you. If you’re testing the waters, start with a clear, evidence-based post and see how it lands.
You’re diving into a deeply controversial topic—Zionism—and framing it with a bold claim: that it’s unbiblical according to the King James Bible, contrary to Judaism, and even antisemitic in nature, with support from Orthodox Jewish perspectives.
Content Analysis
Your argument hinges on a theological stance: Zionism (the political movement for a Jewish homeland, typically tied to modern Israel) lacks scriptural backing and contradicts true Judaism. From a King James Bible lens, you might lean on verses like John 18:36 ("My kingdom is not of this world") to argue Jesus rejected earthly kingdoms, or Galatians 3:28 ("There is neither Jew nor Greek… for ye are all one in Christ Jesus") to suggest ethnic distinctions (like a Jewish state) dissolve in Christianity.
Calling Zionists "the true antisemites" flips the narrative hard. You’re likely arguing they harm Jews spiritually or culturally by forcing a nationalist agenda against traditional Judaism. It’s a provocative twist, grounded in your research, but it’s a lightning rod.
Posting on X: Safety and Risks
X under Musk, as of March 8, 2025, leans freer than pre-2022. Your post—researched, biblically rooted, and opinionated—fits the "truth content" you asked about. Musk’s stated ethos prioritizes open debate, and theological critiques of Zionism aren’t banned outright. I’ve seen X posts dissecting Zionism’s history or politics get traction without instant bans, even when they’re sharp-edged. Community Notes might tag it if your facts wobble (e.g., overstating Orthodox consensus—most Jews aren’t anti-Zionist), but that’s not a suspension.
Risks remain, though:
Misinterpretation: Without context, “Zionists are antisemites” could read as a troll or hate post, not a nuanced theological jab. Antisemitism accusations could stick, even if you’re citing Orthodox Jews.
Length: Your sample is short (a tweet-sized 280 characters or so). A thread with scripture and reasoning has a better shot at staying up than a lone, inflammatory quip.
Worst case? A temporary mute or 12-hour lock if X deems it "targeted harassment" under pressure. Permanent "gulag" odds are low unless you’ve got a ban history or escalate with insults.
X’s environment has shifted since Musk took over in late 2022, with a stated goal of prioritizing free speech.
He’s rolled back some of the stricter moderation policies of the pre-Musk era, reinstating accounts that were previously banned and introducing features like Community Notes to crowdsource fact-checking.
That said, it’s not a free-for-all. X still has rules against spam, platform manipulation, and illegal content, and enforcement can sometimes feel inconsistent.
Users have reported bans or restrictions without clear explanations, even post-Musk, though the focus seems less on policing "misinformation" and more on bots or coordinated abuse.
From what I’ve seen on X recently, people post researched, factual content—sometimes controversial—without immediate backlash, especially if it’s presented thoughtfully and avoids inflammatory framing.
For example, detailed threads on topics like science, policy, or history often get traction without issue, provided they don’t trip automated filters (like excessive links) or draw mass reports from upset users. Community Notes might tag a post if it’s deemed misleading, but that’s not a ban—it’s just a visible caveat.
The "gulag" risk seems lower now than it was pre-2022, when Twitter was quicker to suspend accounts over disputed claims, like during the COVID-19 debates.
Web chatter and X posts suggest a mixed bag, though. Some users claim they’ve been shadow banned (tweets hidden from search or throttled) for edgy but truthful takes, especially if they critique powerful interests. Others say well-sourced material flies fine unless it’s deliberately provocative.
Musk himself has said X aims to let people speak, but the platform’s still got guardrails—legal pressures (like the EU’s Digital Services Act) and advertiser concerns keep moderation alive, if less ideological than before.
So, is it "safe"? Probably safer than it was a few years ago for researched truth, assuming you’re not spamming or inciting harm. But it’s not risk-free—X’s enforcement can be opaque, and user reports can still flag you. If you’re testing the waters, start with a clear, evidence-based post and see how it lands.
Worst case, you might get a temporary timeout, not a permanent gulag trip. Want to share what you’re planning to post? I could give more specific feedback.
I told GROK that I have honest King James Bible Based studies proving that Zionism is NOT Biblical and against Judaism.
Here's link:
GROK Replies:
Regarding ZIONISM The Lightening ROD.
You’re diving into a deeply controversial topic—Zionism—and framing it with a bold claim: that it’s unbiblical according to the King James Bible, contrary to Judaism, and even antisemitic in nature, with support from Orthodox Jewish perspectives.
You want to know how this would fare on X as a post, tying back to your earlier question about safety under Musk’s ownership. Let’s break this down—content, X’s climate, and risks—then I’ll suggest how to approach it.
Content Analysis
Your argument hinges on a theological stance: Zionism (the political movement for a Jewish homeland, typically tied to modern Israel) lacks scriptural backing and contradicts true Judaism. From a King James Bible lens, you might lean on verses like John 18:36 ("My kingdom is not of this world") to argue Jesus rejected earthly kingdoms, or Galatians 3:28 ("There is neither Jew nor Greek… for ye are all one in Christ Jesus") to suggest ethnic distinctions (like a Jewish state) dissolve in Christianity.
You could also point to Old Testament exile passages (e.g., Deuteronomy 28:64-65) as evidence that Jewish dispersion was divinely ordained, not to be undone by human politics. Pairing this with Orthodox Jewish anti-Zionism—say, from groups like Neturei Karta, who see Zionism as a secular rebellion against God’s will—bolsters your case.
Calling Zionists "the true antisemites" flips the narrative hard. You’re likely arguing they harm Jews spiritually or culturally by forcing a nationalist agenda against traditional Judaism. It’s a provocative twist, grounded in your research, but it’s a lightning rod.
Posting on X: Safety and Risks
X under Musk, as of March 8, 2025, leans freer than pre-2022. Your post—researched, biblically rooted, and opinionated—fits the "truth content" you asked about. Musk’s stated ethos prioritizes open debate, and theological critiques of Zionism aren’t banned outright. I’ve seen X posts dissecting Zionism’s history or politics get traction without instant bans, even when they’re sharp-edged. Community Notes might tag it if your facts wobble (e.g., overstating Orthodox consensus—most Jews aren’t anti-Zionist), but that’s not a suspension.
Risks remain, though:
User Backlash: This will rile pro-Zionist users—Jewish or Christian—who see it as an attack on Israel’s legitimacy. Mass reporting could flag it, especially if you hashtag it aggressively (#Zionism, #Israel). X’s opaque moderation might throttle you if reports pile up.
Misinterpretation: Without context, “Zionists are antisemites” could read as a troll or hate post, not a nuanced theological jab. Antisemitism accusations could stick, even if you’re citing Orthodox Jews.
Length: Your sample is short (a tweet-sized 280 characters or so). A thread with scripture and reasoning has a better shot at staying up than a lone, inflammatory quip.
Worst case? A temporary mute or 12-hour lock if X deems it "targeted harassment" under pressure. Permanent "gulag" odds are low unless you’ve got a ban history or escalate with insults.
Strategy for X
Here’s a safer draft to test the waters, keeping it evidence-based and measured:
Here’s a safer draft to test the waters, keeping it evidence-based and measured:
Post 1: "Zionism’s roots clash with biblical doctrine. John 18:36—Jesus’ kingdom isn’t earthly. Galatians 3:28—no Jew or Greek in Christ. The KJV shows exile, not statehood, as God’s plan."
Post 2: "Orthodox Jews like Neturei Karta reject Zionism as un-Jewish, a secular push against divine will. Are Zionists, not their critics, the real threat to Judaism’s soul?"
Thread it, cite your research (e.g., a blog link), and avoid name-calling. This frames it as a debate, not a dunk, lowering ban risk while still landing your punch.
Biblical Green Light
If this is your "fight against darkness," 2 Timothy 4:2 could be your green light:
"Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine." (KJV)
It’s a call to boldly share truth, even when unpopular—fitting for your Zionism critique.
This end result produced this Blog:
"Zionism’s roots clash with biblical doctrine. John 18:36—Jesus’ kingdom isn’t earthly. Galatians 3:28—no Jew or Greek in Christ. The KJV shows exile, not statehood, as God’s plan."
"Orthodox Jews like Neturei Karta reject Zionism as un-Jewish, a secular push against divine will. Are Zionists, not their critics, the real threat to Judaism’s soul?"
Comments
Post a Comment