Another False Teacher Exposed. EnterTheStars

Enter The Stars EntertheStars Has really crssed the line on this video here. please see my remarks.
Dear Sir: You seem - perhaps on the surface to be a sincere young man with an earnest desire for truth and to share with others. In order to do so you must understand that truth is found only in the absolute truth whom is Jesus Christ himself.
It is most Alarming HOWEVER - this video proves you are seeking and sharing perverted truth - poisoned fruit - as did Eve - and you're passing this poisoned fruit on to your subscribers.  
Therefore, I am going to lovingly correct some serious doctrinal error you are teaching your subscribers. You are in this video teaching theories without knowledge (please see Job 38:2). The knowledge you are lacking is only that knowledge found in the KJV Bible.  (Please See notes below regarding Bible Translations).
At time 5:16 you say, quote:  “there are 2 morning stars mentioned in the Bible. One of them is Lucifer the other is Jesus Christ.”
This is NOT True, but rather an Outrageous Damnable Lie. You are speaking egregious Heresy and Blasphemy.  Your idea is a foundational structure of doctrines of demons. Absolutely nowhere in the uncorrupted word of God Canonized KJV Bible is Jesus Christ and Satan aka Lucifer compared or mentioned as the same in any way whatsoever. God Forbid!
Please I ask you to humble yourself before God, ask Him for discernment and carefully read and study the following correction to your error. Fall on your knees and Repent! Find Jesus Christ. The true child of God hears God's voice.  The voice of another they will not follow. John chapter 10.
Let's start here please:
Job 38:7 King James Version (KJV)
7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
God here in this verse is clearly talking about angels (who would later become fallen angels under Lucifer's authority: See Ezekiel chapter 28. Also,  Dr. Eugene Kim does a brilliant study of Job 38, Genesis 1-2 (Gap Theory) and Ezekiel 28 if you're interested). But, nonetheless, these are angels NOT JESUS CHRIST OR LUCIFER.
Commentary on Job 38:7:  Throughout the Bible Angels are referred to as stars or sons of God. There is an absolute preponderance of evidence from theologians and bible scholars that  throughout the entire bible angels (exclusively) are referred to as stars or sons of God. This is definitely NOT referring to Jesus Christ or in context directly to Lucifer himself either.
In Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
Meaning:
Stars — The angels, who may well be called morning-stars, because of their excellent lustre and glory.
Sons of God — The angels called the sons of God, because they had their whole being from him, and because they were made partakers of his Divine and glorious image.
More proof that Angels are called stars :
More on Job 38:7
Look at the context and pattern of Job 38. Context: God is describing the foundation of the world as follows in Job 38:4
Verse 4: “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? The word “ I “ is first person personal pronoun identifying God and only refers directly to God Almighty himself. Who is God? Understand the identity of God is understanding the Godhead. See notes below.
God would not be identifying his image as a star in this meaning if comparing scripture with scripture. grammar,translation and certainly not context.
Scripture with Scripture and the context of Job 38
Following the pattern of Job 38, we see a paradigm of two OF THE same as in verse 5: laid measures-stretched line upon it; verse 6: foundation fastened - cornerstone thereof,.
When we get to verse 7 we see same homogeneous group of angels doing 2 things: Singing and Shouting for Joy.
After mangling Job 38, You tell your subscribers beginning at time 5:25 that the Bible mentions 2 morning stars (again here you're implying that Jesus Christ and Lucifer are both morning stars as you clearly said at time 5:16. You say you're not going to get into that, but I want to and I'm going to.
Let's look at Isaiah 14:12:
Isaiah 14:12-14 King James Version (KJV)
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations.
Lucifer in the KJV is correctly identified as SON OF THE MORNING… NOT MORNING STAR.
Now let's look at Isaiah 14:12 in the corrupted New International Version (NIV)
Isaiah 14:12-14 New International Version (NIV)
12 How you have fallen from heaven,
   morning star, son of the dawn!
You have been cast down to the earth,
   you who once laid low the nations!
The NIV doesn't say who is mentioned here, but son of morning has been changed to MORNING STAR. In other words the NIV here along with other corrupted new translations calls Jesus Christ Lucifer otherwise known as Satan.
Now Let's see who The King James Bible correctly identifies as THE MORNING STAR.
Read Revelation 22:16:
Revelation 22:16 King James Version (KJV)
16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
Also note Job 38:7 uses morning stars (plural- angels)  Jesus Christ Himself identifies Himself as THE  (definite article= only one, no others) BRIGHT AND MORNING STAR.
Read
Revelation 2:28
Revelation 2:28 King James Version (KJV)
28 And I will give him the morning star.
Do you honestly believe Jesus Christ is telling the overcoming true believers that he will give them Lucifer? The NIV. ESV and other modern - so called easier to read -  perverted, polluted Bible translations sure do. Read for yourself.
Revelation 2:28 New International Version (NIV)
28 I will also give that one the morning star.
Wait, The NIV and the other modern versions tell us that the morning star is Lucifer. ???
Other same is found in 2 Peter 1:19,...
Note the perverted Bible translations also confuse Revelation 8:10, 9:1 with Jesus Christ when in actuality these refer to angels by both context and comparing words of scripture.
You tell a subscriber Vulgar Display of Power, “Jesus and Satan used to sing together in Heaven.” Where is that in scripture? Answer: Absolutely nowhere. You're making this up which means adding to scripture. Very dangerous. Stop and Repent.
If you fail to heed this reproof You will go deeper into false belief and end up being more and more  deceived and in turn deceiving others. There is a huge terrible penalty to this. Please read Galatians 1:9.
God will not be mocked.  Stop bringing Jesus Christ to open shame.
Notes: Additional links:
Understanding Bible Translations.  Why only the Textus Receptus Antioch source for Canon KJV 1611 and NOT the CORRUPT Vatican Alexandria ( Codex Vaticanus,  Sinaiticus - Septuagint - Souces for NIV, ESV, NASB, etc and other perverted modern translations version is true:

God will not be mocked.

Notes: 

Why King James Only?


Understanding Bible Translations.  Why only the Textus Receptus Antioch source for Canon KJV 1611 and NOT the CORRUPT Vatican Alexandria ( Codex Vaticanus,  Sinaiticus - Septuagint - Sources for NIV, ESV, NASB, etc and other perverted modern translations version is true:



Comments

  1. Nice try.
    "Lucifer" actually translates to "morning star" in the concordance in Isaiah 14:12.
    So, "O Lucifer, son of the morning!" is actually O 'morning star', son of the morning!
    Here is the reference.
    http://lexiconcordance.com/hebrew/1966.html
    O Lucifer, son of the morning!
    The unity in heaven, is spoken about in Job, "when all the morning stars sang together".
    Because, as you said, Jesus is the lead morning star, but before Lucifer's fall, he sang together with the other morning stars.
    Rather than divide the Body of Christ, with "gotcha" accusations like this, you'd be better off trying to work together to bring more people to Christ. Posts like this have the enemy and non-believers laughing at us.
    The entire reason why I addressed the 'two Lucifers' paradox, is because people kept accusing Jesus of being the devil. This study was in DEFENSE of Christ and helped differentiate him from the evil one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for confirming beyond all shadow of doubt how profoundly lost and misguided you truly are. Please do not delete your comment. I want others to see you unmasked. I pray both our comments and my Blog post stand as an eternal witness and testimony before God. Amen!

      Delete
    2. Yep, don't worry, I'm doing an entire show on your blog and presenting the evidence. Prepare for lots of comments here. You got your wish. You're famous, for all the wrong reasons. Like I said, dividing the body of Christ and nitpicking your brothers will be your judgement. judge not, lest thee be judged. The Isaiah concordance is CLEAR. Lucifer translates as MORNING STAR. Just because it doesn't show up in the King James, doesn't mean it's not there. There are mistakes in the KJV, although not as many as the other translations, but this is why you have to go back to the root language and the concordance. Not rely on an English translation for sensitive scriptures like this. So, Mr. Traveler, (masonic code), I wish you luck in your endeavors.

      Delete
    3. Thank you for reconfirmed confirmation. Please do not delete your comment.

      Delete
    4. This guy is lost!! How can he (enter the stars), read your blog on this rebuttal and still not see it.

      He obviously cares more about being right then he does the truth.

      This is sad. He will deceive many with this false teaching of his!

      Delete
    5. Traveler you are lost. Review your compass. I'll pray for you.

      Delete
    6. Image Sourcery: Image: Representation of the external form of a person. Oxford English Dictionary page 1376. Source: underlying support, underprop; to rise or spring; assault/attack. a Bird of Prey. Oxford English Dictionary page 2931. Suffix "ery" denotes occupation, capabilities. Word play with the word: Sorcery: One who practices witchcraft. Purpose of word play of this nature: - Occult - to hide by taking a Word and presenting a "double meaning" is to use wit, Oxford English Dictionary page: 3804 (one who uses signs, tokens (words) to reveal the hidden. In this case: A person who openly displays sorcery as its underlying support in order to prey upon God's children. A person who hides the word sorcery by a play on words and uses: sourcery...

      You and your kind have no concept of the truth because the truth is not in you. John 8:42-27.

      Again I see more confirmation of "who" enterthestars truly is and "what" he's truly all about.

      I want no part of you, your kind and certainly NOT your useless prayers.

      Delete
  2. Agree with Traveler Andrew and foundation scripture!! The Bible says don't add or take away what has been written in the Bible!! Enter the stars and other's are trying to add and take away... This deep digging that some of these people do is Ridiculous and Blasphemous!! I was blessed to be brought up in Adrian Roger's church... he always said be careful of ear ticklers and people trying to interpret the Bible and twist the Bible around to suit them..I'm glad you "called ets out" Everyone at this time needs to be Careful of what we listen to..Me, I believe what's in the Bible!!No adding to it or taking away from it!! Shame on these people that do!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amen claudia. May God be true and His enemies be liars and be scattered. Amen!

      Delete
  3. Good Morning,
    I read your blog and was hoping you could elaborate your view.
    If Lucifer is not an Angel or Fallen Angel, what is he?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown,

      If you did in fact carefully read the blog, there is no need to elaborate. If you did in fact read the blog carefully, then there's no way to reveal the meaning of my words because you cannot see - will not see - shall not see - the truth here. In giving you the benefit of the doubt you're not a troll or an enterthestars sycophant - Perhaps you might try to synthesize this: Wake Up Call! For those who have eyes to see. The Modern Bibles and their perverse Modern Lexicons, like their creators, have an intrinsic hatred for Jesus Christ. They have removed the name Lucifer from Isaiah 14:12 and given Lucifer the title bestowed on Jesus Christ as proven in Revelation 22:16 KJB. The King James Bible clearly writes: LUCIFER and tells us that Lucifer is the "son of the morning". NOT THE MORNING STAR who is Jesus Christ Revelation 22:16 KJB. EnterTheStars and his kind capitalizes on this in his perverse teaching since he relies entirely on perverted Bible translations and their associated Lexicons. I pray this young man is doing this in ignorance and not willful intent. However as his comments and the comments of his fellows flow in it seems this is chronic and endemic in the sense of deep rooted, permanent. But perverse Bible translations is what gives false teachers ample room to go into perverse strange doctrines of demons. Professing themselves to be wise they have become fools. The deeper they go the darker and more perverse their minds-hearts become. After a time God turns them over to a Reprobate Mind. Read Romans 1:18-20 carefully.

      Now moving on to your question... Sadly it now seems sure - certain in fact that you really DID NOT read the Blog did you? Let's go back and read your question carefully. I will give you a minute to carefully read and think about your question...Think about what your asking in regards to what my Blog stated. Come back to my comment now... What you're doing is building a strawman - false narrative implying that in my Blog I stated that Satan is not an angel or fallen angel but in reality I never discussed who Satan is, did I? No I did not. Let's rewrite your question like this, ok? Quote: "After reading your Blog, I was wondering if you might share with me who Lucifer is "now" according to Scripture? I will respond as follows: According the the King James Bible, in accordance with Ezekiel 28:14,15, Isaiah 14:12, Luke 10, Revelation 12and the Oxford English Dictionary page 1674 Lucifer (Light Bearing/Bearer.) *

      Continuing, the proper name of "The" (the definite article here denotes Lucifer was in the highest and only appointed above the others) anointed (much could be written regarding anointed in the context of Lucifer's appointment) Cherub, that covereth" (the "eth" suffix in old English means a superlative in the function of cover and much could be written in the context of Lucifer's position of authority and purpose)... and "perfect" from the day he was "created" (The highest, most perfect being in the form of a Cherub that God created) We know from the name: Lucifer was the name given to the anointed Cherub of God until Lucifer was literally cast out of heaven (the 3rd heaven) with his followers who became fallen angels. After Lucifer was cast out, He became known as: Satan, the Devil, The Dragon, The Serpent and exists as an angelic being who is a created BEING.

      Proposal: Let’s do some homework together. Using only a King James Bible, A Dictionary, Concordance, (NO perverted Lexicons like BDB, Thayer and even Strong’s) but use Dictionary. Please check everything I’ve stated and confirm it for me. Also, if you wouldn’t mind, why does Satan have other names like Devil.. Is this significant? Good question perhaps.

      Thank you.


      Delete
    2. * Ethmology: *leuk- Proto-Indo-European root meaning "light, brightness." Lucence is from late 15c. mid-15c., "shining, bright, luminous," from Latin lucentem (nominative lucens), present participle of lucere "to shine, glow, be bright," from PIE root *leuk- "light,) Note: The Oxford Dictionary notes that the origin of the compound noun was given to the term morning star in the 10th Century and the term "day star" was added by the Revised Version (the corrupted manuscripts of the 1880 work of Wescott and Hort). So we see clearly that the name Lucifer means BRIGHTNESS OF LIGHT and the suffix "fer" denotes that which carries = that which carries light. The Oxford Dictionary does not lie and neither does the King James Bible. The meaning of Lucifer is LIGHT BEARER. The term day star and morning star was tagged on the true meaning of LUCIFER as an added meaning and NOT the original meaning.The same thing happened by the translation of the Modern Bibles,.

      Delete
  4. You said use oxford dictionary then why does it say below the definition:
    Lucifer noun

    /ˈluːsɪfə(r)/

    /ˈluːsɪfər/
    [singular]

    ​the Devil synonym Satan

    Word OriginOld English, from Latin, ‘light-bringing, morning star’, from lux, luc- ‘light’ + -fer ‘bearing’. This sense is by association with the ‘son of the morning’ mentioned in the Bible (Isa. 14:12), believed by Christian interpreters to be a reference to Satan.
    https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/lucifer?q=lucifer

    Of note: from Latin, ‘light-bringing, morning star’, from lux, luc- ‘light’ + -fer ‘bearing’

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why does the Oxford Dictionary say this? The answer is because it says what it says and means what it says = LIGHT BEARER = Lucifer by definition. This term LUCIFER is BY ASSOCIATION WITH SON OF MORNING (exactly what KJB says). Amen!

      However, when your Oxford reference continues with quote: " is referenced to Satan."

      This is an updated commentary. Satan is the name given to Lucifer AFTER the fall. We know this from all associated scripture.

      I believed you pulled this down from the internet Oxford. I'm checking now. The Hard Copy Compact Dictionary 1971 says on page 1674, which I speak of above in my previous comment, defines Lucifer as you list in your Oxford version. However, the commentary does not say "believed by Christian interpreters to be referenced to Satan." Read it for yourself. You may have to go to a library. I told you what the Hard Copy says. I actually like the online definition you found but they should have written: "which would LATER be referred to as Satan, the Devil, The Dragon, etc."

      So, what is your point here? If you're a troll I will close this out here. If you can provide me with substance and have a heart to learn, I will respond. If not.... Bye!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Featured Blogs

Who are you Amir Tsarfati? - My Brother in Christ or A Ravenous Wolf in 'Sheep's Clothing

Rebuking Dr. Eugene Kim BBC INTERNATIONAL

Understanding Our Seven-Fold Blessing