Understanding Bible Translations. Why only the Textus Receptus Antioch source for Canon KJV 1611 and NOT the CORRUPT Vatican Alexandria ( Codex Vaticanus, Sinaiticus - Septuagint - Souces for NIV, ESV, NASB, etc and other perverted modern translations version is true:
Examples of major modern bible translation errors
Examples of modern Bible errors
https://youtu.be/_DL5aYOj0F0
https://youtu.be/EpZ7chF4TT0
The True History of the King James Bible Translation
LINK
They know good bereans with the KJV see the errors of corrupt translations but say the Latin Septuagint translation (A Vatican Translation) actually agrees with modern Translation. The Septuagint changes Hebrew and original Alexandria Greek vs Antioch see link Understanding Bible Translations. Ask any Reprobate who defends the Textus Vaticanus Codex Vaticanus Sinairus Alexandrian Manuscripts Latin Septuagint why there Hundreds of major flaws example John 7:53-8:16 omitted, etc.
THE GODHEAD:
https://youtu.be/Bh3n1Y_J_ak
WHAT ABOUT THE NEW KING JAMES BIBLE READ AND HEED:
The NKJV is just as bad as the other modern verions like the ESV, NIV etc. and are in fact actually a Jesuit inspired work:
The problem with the NKJV as you can study it for yourself by a King James Bible scholar in the link and many videos, is a trick to draw in the King James Crowd. In fact, you wouldn't believe it but there's now a NEW NEW King James Version on the street.
It now is fully tells us that we are NOT SAVED but are BEING - the process of being Saved.
The word sodomite is now completely obliterated. ETC.
The Jesuits have completely infiltrated. The first NKJV was only a warm up.
The most wicked trick of the New King James Bible is it promised to be faithful to the original KJV except making the vocabulary and grammar clearer. This is an outrageous lie. Example: Ezra 8:36 KJV reads: "And they delivered the king's commissions unto the king's lieutenants." However the NKJV reads: "And they delivered the king's orders to the king's satraps..." Does "satraps" make the original meaning clearer?
The Truth is that MOST of the NKJV mirrors exactly what the other perverted Bibles do and NOT what they sold as staying close to the original.
Facts: In the first chapter of John's Gospel there are 51 verses. Of this total 45 (88%) have been altered by the NKJV that are more in line with the perverted translations than the KJV.
Examples:
John 1:3: change “All things were made BY him;” to “All things were made THROUGH Him” (NIV, NRSV, RSV)
John 4:24: changes the KJV “God is a spirit” to the impersonal, New Age pantheistic, “God is spirit” (NIV, NASV, NRSV)
The List of serious violations is extensive. Please take a moment to review:
In my own personal use where I was astounded by the profound major doctrinal errors of our Christians walk, I implore you to compare scripture like here in Romans 3:22 among thousands of others that "significantly" alter and pervert the meaning.
King James Bible:
22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
New King James
22 even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all [a]and on all who believe. For there is no difference;
The use of the preposition "Of" compared to "In" does not mean the same. OF is the literal Faith that Jesus Christ possesses. "In" means I believe in the Faith He has. I pray you can see this.
Romans 8:1 KJB reads:
8 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
The NKJV reads:
8 There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who[a] do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.
Read full chapter
2 major errors here in Romans 8:1 in NKJV: AFTER = to follow ; ACCORDING = "agreeing". . The footnotes again instill doubt by inserting doubt.
Speaking of FOLLOW vs imitate or agree
5 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children;
Walk in Love
5 Therefore be imitators of God as dear children.
Look at these scriptures please:
If 2 Timothy 3:16 tells us that ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God which the NKJV is pretty close to the KJV, then WHY does the NKJV agree, then when we use the NKJV or any modern translation, we're going to seriously compromise God's word.
Confusing Satan with Jesus Christ
Isaiah 14:12
The Fall of Lucifer
12 “How you are fallen from heaven,
O [a]Lucifer, son of the morning!
How you are cut down to the ground,
You who weakened the nations!
Read full chapterIf we go to Day Star - dictionaries show this as the
morning star which is Jesus Christ. Verify this Revelation
22:16 KJB
Comments
Post a Comment