1 Kings 10:14

“Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold,”

King James Version (KJV)

Ezra 2:13

“The children of Adonikam, six hundred sixty and six.”

King James Version (KJV)

1 Kings 11:4-7 (KJV)

4 For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. 5 For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. 6 And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. 7Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.

Acts 7:43 (KJV)

Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.

From my original study here exposing King Solomon as a Type and Shadow of the AntiChrist Sister Amber wrote and asked for a sequel and a part 2 going more into detail.

King Solomon the type and shadow of the AntiChrist

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/10/king-solomon-type-and-shadow-of.html

For background this is how theologians view King Solomon which is contrary to the King James Bible:

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/05/how-bible-scholars-view-king-solomon.html

https://youtu.be/LquzDuQfASI?si=gfOC50SQ9YXKV0w3

Connect this with

https://x.com/AndrewTHTravel/status/1941865575795315029

Sister it all came together for me this morning. I will proceed with the sequel to my original Solomon study.

The Star of Remphan

https://youtu.be/Jyr_NNEdXdM?si=El4A4udV39p4MokQ

Sister Amber commentary:

The conception of freemasonry is of Jewish origin the founder is considered to be be king Solomon who ruled in Israel’s greatest time. The origin of the temple (that’s why the 2 pillars in free masonry) and the rituals that use the Hebrew language all goes back to king Solomon. That is why you reject the name Yeshua if Jesus Christ is in you!

Solomon is the one that brought in the strange Gods.

He sought after wisdom and earthly treasures more than seeking a relationship with God. He led Israel astray and why they are of the synagogue of Satan to this day! There is nothing new under the sun.

Solomon wanted the shulamite girl that he couldn’t have because her heart belonged to her Shepard, Jesus Christ.

Solomon was an antichrist and that spirit is still alive today. The connections between Solomon are Trump are mind blowing! His penthouse suite is extremely revealing down to the 2 pillars and his worship of the little g god Apollo.

The White House now is adorned in Gold.

He is telling people with eyes to see and ears to hear EXACTLY who is is, or at the very least, being controlled by. Ever wonder how a man Trumps age has that much energy… well the Bible tells us how he is fueled.

1 Kings 11:4-7 Ezra 2:13, Acts 7:43 KJV

Notes

https://x.com/DravenNoctis/status/1923011558025634173?t=D2Pjlxn5rEt0atclhwD9vw&s=19

https://youtu.be/g1ijgM1T2Ds?si=lUsQ3Z61A2X3umFR

The practice of Arabian women with long hair waving their hair in front of dignitaries is likely the Khaleegy dance, a traditional folk dance from the Arabian Peninsula, performed at weddings and social events, potentially including dignitaries. Its meaning is to celebrate and honor important occasions, symbolizing joy, beauty, and cultural heritage, with hair movements emphasizing femininity. Historically, it has roots over 1,000 years old, evolving as a communal expression, with plausible inclusion in royal contexts as of May 15, 2025.

Key Citations

26 web pages

I believe there's a connection here to Women Hair Flashing to women being covered in 1 Corinthians 11

And Divine Feminine deception. There is also a connection to King Solomon and his Harem and many wives in The Exploitation and Dehumanizing Mocking God’s purpose of a Modest Godly Woman. This all goes back to the curse on Eve and women being ruled by her husband Genesis 3:16 and therefore the terrible tyranny of a woman under an unsaved man. The worst is man being so weak and manipulated by an ungodly woman that destroys him as was Adam, Samson, Solomon, and so many others.

TITLE:

"COME OUT OF HER AND COME TO HIM".

Thesis Statement:

The command to "Come out of her and come to Him" is a plea of the Saints to those who are in the Laodicean Church to forsake the BEWITCHING SPIRIT Paul identifies in Galatians 3:1 KJB and Come to Jesus Christ. This study is a thorough examination of King Solomon as the type and shadow of the Antichrist and certainly NOT a type and figure of Jesus Christ..

This is an examination of the life of King Solomon through the lens of the King James Bible as an example for the church to learn in working out our salvation through fear and trembling - Philippians 2:12 KJB. Completely contrary to conventional wisdom of mainstream theologians of the apostate church today, King Solomon is the type and shadow of the Antichrist - and certainly not of Jesus Christ.

See a few like John MacArthur in his study Bible and sermons, interprets the Song as a literal love poem about Solomon and his bride, with Solomon as a type of the Messianic king. And Jim Hamilton regarding Solomon as a type of the Messianic king.

But what stands out as paramount to proving Colossians 2:8 KJB today’s modern Bible scholars is in lock step going back to 1,000 years to the perverse teachings coming out of Alexandria. In which NONE of the prominent - peer evaluated, recognized scholars ever considered Solomon nothing other than a Man of God and type of Christ and the Millennial Reign. And certainly NEVER a type of the Antichrist. See the full background:

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/05/how-bible-scholars-view-king-solomon.html

In my many years of Bible research, it has been proven time and time again that anytime the vast majority of “world recognized theologians” are in agreement, it is most ALWAYS likely after the Traditions of Man and NOT after Jesus Christ.

This powerful seducing spirit is the Divine Feminine, aka Jezebel spirit, aka Queen of Heaven which is the spirit of the Antichrist..

what comes to my mind is this scripture:

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. (Rev 18:2)

Through uniting himself with foreign wives, he has acted as "the kings of the earth" by uniting himself with the Queen of Heaven whom his foreign wives worshipped, and thereby he brought in every possible form of abomination, which grew into a mighty tree but gave place for the fowl in it's branches (place for evil spirits to lodge)

The kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. (Rev 18:3)

Solomon shows us not to try set up a kingdom of God on earth by human hands for God does not lodge in temples made by hands.

Solomon shows our best efforts come to naught and are as filthy rags

How the World connects Solomon’s many wives:

https://youtube.com/shorts/3JAxf-hqVnI?si=m6Emf6qhm3RRwF7I

Third Temple and the Black Cube Symbolism

https://youtu.be/whnUZ-_ohJw?si=WJGPMqzZixwBM-qi

The Queen of Heaven EXPOSED; Expose Darkness 511

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/03/the-queen-of-heaven-exposed-expose.html

The Queen of Heaven EXPOSED; Conclusion #, with Solomon as a type of the Messianic king.

doctrinematters #apostasy #endtimes #kjvonly

https://youtu.be/34SYPGlAS58

Solomon:

They went out from us, but they were not of us; …

1 John 2:19

“They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.”

King James Version (KJV)

Andrew Comment:

You're correct in your thoughts specifically referring to Solomon himself.

However, the ORIGINAL SIN from the Fall in the Garden of Adam and Eve was the Original "Leaven". And to be precise, it was the Serpent - Satan, that brought "death" through the LIE "You shall be as God."

At the heart of Solomon goes back to the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

This is the ROOT of all EVIL without doubt and what caused the FALL. Ultimately, it was what caused Satan (Formerly known as LUCIFER - The Light Bearer) to FALL because of his desire to be God. Isaiah 12:14-15 and Ezekial 28:12-17 and Luke 10:18 KJB.

In my study and research it is all about us knowing beyond measure of human understanding that we seek after. This is what I refer to as "wrong" or "evil" wisdom when we attempt to gain wisdom outside of God which we have as THE WORD OF GOD = The WORD = Jesus Christ. Solomon is very clear in Proverbs that Wisdom is a very good thing and highly to be sought after and his wisdom "INITIALLY" came from God which is GOOD....

However,... IF it does NOT come from GOD but from our vanity trying to find it outside of Him and HIS WORD = Jesus Christ. We are in trouble and all of it is vanity and leads to destruction. Because our CARNAL MIND is enmity against God - Romans 8:7 we fall into Man's Wisdom = Philosophy, Vain Deceit, Tradition of Man and the Rudiments of this World and NOT after Christ. Colossians 2:8 KJB.

Whenever we study scripture we must thoroughly and rigidly discipline ourselves in examining each scripture to fully understand its meaning in: 1. CONTEXT. 2. Study and break down the grammar, vocabulary, syntax. 3. Find the Harmonizing (witness) scriptures that match and confirm the meaning. I go over this in detail in my work, How to Understand the King James Bible.

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2022/04/understand-bible-from-workman-approved.html

I love what Dr. John Hinton, a strong KJV Only proponent, used to tell me: "We must study the Bible "horizontally," using all scripture to "prove" scripture. Also we must always allow scripture to interpret itself and not allow ourselves to "force" an interpretation.

Our wisdom comes from the Holy Spirit - The Spirit of Christ in us who is the Spirit of Truth. Not to go into inspiration we get from "thoughts" that God guides us, which we always must match with scripture - TEST THE SPIRITS. 1 John 4:1 KJB. Which means for us today THE WORD OF GOD.

We see for example in scripture WISDOM as Good and WISDOM as Bad.

Wisdom as Good:

Proverbs 1:7: "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction," establishing wisdom as a divine attribute.
Proverbs 3:13: "Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth understanding," highlighting its blessings.
Proverbs 8:35: "For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD," linking wisdom to life and divine favor.
Ecclesiastes 7:12: "For wisdom is a defence, and money is a defence: but the excellency of knowledge is, that wisdom giveth life to them that have it," affirming its protective and life-giving nature.

Foolishness (Rejection of Wisdom) as Bad:

Proverbs 1:29-31: "For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD: They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices," showing the consequences of rejecting wisdom.
Proverbs 9:13-18: Describes the foolish woman who leads to death, contrasting with wisdom's life-giving invitation.
Ecclesiastes 2:21: "For there is a man whose labour is in wisdom, and in knowledge, and in equity; yet to a man that hath not laboured therein shall he leave it for his portion. This also is vanity and a great evil," suggesting that wisdom's benefits can be lost, leading to futility.

As I pointed out earlier in my Study about Godly Women vs Ungodly Women in this Blog, We see the subject pronoun SHE as both GOOD - in Proverbs Chapter 2. And BAD as the Foolish woman in Proverbs 5 and the Strange Woman in Proverbs 5, 7, 23.

Therefore, we can not by doctrine say that Wisdom SHE is leaven or evil IN ALL CASES. But rather, WISDOM NOT of God is very evil and of the Devil and a snare.

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/04/i-am-black-but-comely-antithesis-to.html

Corollary to the Queen of Heaven Study from Sister Quandra

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/04/corollary-to-queen-of-heaven-study-from.html

King Solomon Type and Shadow of the AntiChrist

https://youtu.be/z3V85BgikWM?si=bRFlleqfo1QtONoX

Amber Struble

https://youtu.be/CcgoFyBEZZk?si=cAxJiiamYIQHa0rN

Please watch this pagan take on Solomon.

“The seal of Solomon is the star on Israel’s flag.

Please watch when you have time because it begs to question why pagans and freemasons love king Solomon.

King Solomon the type and shadow of the AntiChrist

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/10/king-solomon-type-and-shadow-of.html

Why is Wisdom FEMININE in the Bible?

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/05/study-on-why-wisdom-is-feminine-in-bible.html

Comparison of Solomon and the Antichrist Figure

Aspect	Solomon (1 Kings 11)	Antichrist Figure (Daniel 7, 11)
Relation to God of Fathers	Turns from the God of Israel by worshiping foreign gods (Ashtoreth, Milcom) due to his wives’ influence.	Rejects the “God of his fathers” entirely, exalting himself above all gods (Daniel 11:37).
Nature of Sin	Apostasy through idolatry, but not a complete rejection of God; continues to rule Israel.	Blasphemy, self-deification, and active opposition to God and His saints (Daniel 7:25, 11:36).
Divine Judgment	Kingdom divided after his death; his dynasty loses most of Israel (1 Kings 11:11).	Destroyed by divine intervention after a set period (Daniel 7:26, 11:45).
Role of Pride	Pride indirectly implied through wealth, power, and marriages (1 Kings 10–11).	Explicit self-exaltation, magnifying himself above all gods (Daniel 11:36).
Impact on Faithful	Leads Israel into idolatry, weakening covenant fidelity (1 Kings 11:7–8).	Persecutes and “wears out” the saints, seeking to destroy God’s people (Daniel 7:25).
Women’s Influence	Foreign wives turn his heart to idolatry (1 Kings 11:4). * deep analysis is required to see how a man with many wives “has no regard or desire for women, but collects them like a possession as cattle.” See commentary below titled: “AC - Solomon connection to disregard for women.	Disregards “the desire of women,” possibly rejecting marriage or human ties (Daniel 11:37).
Legacy	Mixed: Wise king and Temple builder, but his apostasy leads to division (1 Kings 12).	Purely negative: A figure of evil, destroyed by God (Daniel 7:26).

Disregard for women:

Lack of Genuine Regard:

Antichrist: The “no desire for women” suggests a detachment from human relationships, including women’s desires (whether for marriage, family, or messianic hope). This indifference treats women as irrelevant to his self-glorifying agenda, effectively dehumanizing them by omission.
Solomon: His accumulation of 1,000 women depersonalizes them, reducing them to political assets or sexual objects. Moreover, collecting them as possessions like cattle.
Like the Antichrist, Solomon’s focus is on power (alliances, wealth), not women’s individuality or dignity, treating them as means to an end.

Amber commentary:

Quote:

“I listened to your show on solomon and immediately subscribed because very few people speak on this.

They revere him as someone with great wisdom and even name their children after him. pastors preach about how great he was but he only STARTED out worshipping the true God of his father and then he let WOMEN turn him to their Gods and he NEVER repented at least I can’t see that he repented in scripture so how are we to assume he is in heaven and to be revered in the pulpits.

Married foreign women, obsessed with Gold, built many buildings, ark of the covenant, strongest military, had all earthly treasures they could ever want, building a temple and DID NOT REPENT. Are you familiar that Donald Trump openly admits that?

I randomly found an old Bible at my work place and asked if I could keep it and the owner let me take it home. It had books in it that I had never seen and one was the wisdom of Solomon I almost got scared of it as I was reading because it sounded like he was getting his wisdom from the devil and he was referring to wisdom as “HER”

Just recently I have noticed that some of the most evil and vile people are beautiful females… so I started looking into the jezebel spirit and how women lead men to destruction so your QUEEN OF HEAVEN study was quite compelling and confirming to me.

I enjoy your extensive biblical knowledge so a deeper dive on Solomon and the black girl (that the devil possibly usurped) and luciferians worship the black Madonna. I’ve heard stories that loooong ago the Catholic Church would have normal services on the first floor and the Freemasons and such would be below worshipping a different God and the black virgin. *

Thank you for allowing me this outlet as most people wouldn’t want to discuss these thingsI love Jesus Christ with my whole heart and I pray every day that he will guide me to the only truth that is him and I will not be deceived. Praying this daily has led God to remove many scales from my eyes. God bless you brother!

I was just thinking today about how Solomon’s brother was planning on becoming the king after David died and Bethsheba and Nathan went to David on his deathbed and persuaded him to have Solomon be the king. Did they trick him while he was dying? Was Solomon the true usurper and not Adonijah? Or did God want Solomon as the King?

Also I just read proverbs 9 today and I had to google who wrote it and the answer was Solomon!

I was totally blown away!

I read 9:5 and 9:17 over and over again.

The wine is mingled

The stolen bread…. Woah!!!”

End Quote.

. https://www.canva.com/design/DAGmpKfPepg/92zQ4ZZGwQJkpf3n3SqB4w/view?utm_content=DAGmpKfPepg&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=uniquelinks&utlId=hb199b32567

Expose Darkness video linked on the black stone black madonna worship says this black madonna was worshipped secretly in satanic ways late at night in the same church where during the day they worship the "white" virgin Mary

https://youtu.be/v1mLJgtDAM0?si=CBYy4uV4jWtkg2Ez&t=278

________________________________________________

Jesus Christ is Wisdom; the Queen of Heaven is the antichrist counterfeit #doctrinematters #kjvonly

https://youtu.be/1kg34h_Y9oM?si=GwHTrtnhmgrXnIVf

This is the video that connected so many dots for me and this is how it is all connected! Let’s start at the beginning in the garden. The devil beguiled Eve with wisdom to be like gods. Then let’s read the wisdom of Solomon. Let’s see what the Holy Spirit puts on your heart as you read it. Is Solomon getting his wisdom from the God that we worship or is he being told all of the secrets in the universe by another god. My spirit tells me he is. Getting his wisdom from the queen of heaven! There are clearly some things that we are forbidden to know as humans. Now read Galatians 1:8 but even if we or AN ANGEL FROM HEAVEN speaks another gospel other than what we have preached to you let them be accursed.

Solomons unquenching thirst of knowledge led him away from God and into the false light!

When you receive wisdom from the true light (Jesus) you receive gift of the spirit.

When you receive wisdom from the false light (queen of heaven) you receive earthly treasures.

King Solomon is a perfect example of this truth that we are all coming to understand.

If we start at the beginning in the garden and remember that Eve sinned for knowledge to be like gods and follow it all the way to our present time. The Lucifer worshipers are still doing the same thing. The Illuminati (illumination) forbidden knowledge the call themselves enlightened.

When Solomon speaks in wisdom of Solomon he refers to that light. Stating he would forgo the sun to stay in t

It’s beautiful to me that Jesus has led us all here revealing the same things to each of us. Helping us to connect so many dots and find each other!

The Black Madonna: Her Mystery, Meaning & Magic

https://youtu.be/K6TzH_a8cfc?si=SRHIBxk6WrXCtxCU

Andrew’s comment:

Adding in my commentary to Amber's thoughts on Proverbs Chapter 9. Yes, we know Solomon wrote Proverbs. No doubt that it was God's "permissive will" that Solomon would be King, just as we see God's permissive will when the people wanted a King as he Pagan Nations and Saul was made King. God of course knew King Saul would tax the people and send their sons off to wars and eventually be a disaster. Read and study 1 Samuel Chapter 8 KJB and then take a hard look at Matthew Chapter 17 in its entirety to fully understand the “Tabernacle” of man which is bondage of “tribute”.

1 Samuel 8 in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. In this chapter, the Israelites ask the prophet Samuel to appoint a king to rule over them, like other nations. God tells Samuel to warn the people about the consequences of having a king.

Here are some relevant verses from 1 Samuel 8:10-18 (KJV):

10 And Samuel told all the words of the Lord unto the people that asked of him a king.
11 And he said, This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots.
12 And he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties; and will set them to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and instruments of his chariots.
13 And he will take your daughters to be confectionaries, and to be cooks, and to be bakers.
14 And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your oliveyards, even the best of them, and give them to his servants.
15 And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants.
16 And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put them to his work.
17 He will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants.
18 And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the Lord will not hear you in that day.

Matthew 17:25

“He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers?”

Let's talk about David. Even the man after God's own heart King David sinned and made terrible mistakes. Need I mention the big 3: Bathsheba (adultery, murder), the Censoring (pride, disregard to God's commandment) , and building the Temple (basically a slap in God’s face) even though God said He did NOT need or desire a Temple, but preferred Tabernacles. *

*Note: Back in 2020 while working on my study, “I don’t go to Church,” a profound part was the study on CHURCH BUILDINGS ARE NOT BIBLICAL. Please see these studies:

Brick and Mortar 501C3 buildings called churches run by apostate CEOs called pastors are not biblical

Brick and Mortar Church Buildings are not BIBLICAL (thethirdheaventraveler.com)

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2020/10/i-dont-go-to-church.html

2 Samuel 24:15, 2 Samuel 11:2-17, Exodus 20:14, 17, 2 Samuel 24:14.

Acts 7:48; 1 Kings 8:27, preferred tabernacles, symbolizing His presence among His people (Leviticus 23:34-43).

God’s grace restored David’s repentant heart (Psalm 32:5).

Strike 3. Not once but 3 times David sinned and did something "against" God's commandment or desire. HOWEVER, as we know David had a TRUE BROKEN CONTRITE HEART Read Psalm 32:5, AND Chapter 51 KJB.

In my study on Church Buildings are NOT biblical I go into this deep history showing that it was NEVER God's will for a "glorious temple" to house God. He was fine with the Tabernacles. See also the deep study on the FEAST of Tabernacles which will be fully realized in the physical during the Millennial Reign Zechariah 14:16 in my Millennial Kingdom Study.

God designated Solomon to build a temple He never desired.

See notes below where I took my blog and had a deep study from the King James Bible on how God shows us his ultimate PLAN OF REDEMPTION that was first fulfilled by Jesus Christ coming and dying on the cross for our sins and will be fully fulfilled in the Millennial Kingdom.

The Millennial Kingdom Teaching: The Heart of the Matter

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/01/the-millennial-kingdom-teaching-heart.html

Andrew Sheets’ “The Millennial Kingdom Teaching Heart” argues Ezekiel 40–48 (KJV) describes a literal Third Temple, built with Antichrist’s involvement (2 Thessalonians 2:4; Daniel 9:27), distinct from the New Jerusalem (Revelation 21:2, 22). Modern scholars err by allegorizing Ezekiel’s detailed vision (Ezekiel 40:5, 43:20), misplacing it in the Millennium, or ignoring the Antichrist’s role, thus missing its Tribulation context. The Third Temple’s animal sacrifices (Ezekiel 45:15–25) contrast with the New Jerusalem’s sacrifice-free Feast of Tabernacles pilgrimage (Zechariah 14:16–17), reflecting God’s eternal tabernacle (Revelation 21:3). Sheets’ literal interpretation, rooted in the KJV, coherently aligns with end-time prophecy, exposing scholars’ missteps and affirming the distinct prophetic roles of Ezekiel’s temple and the New Jerusalem.

XAI from Notes above from Andrew Sheets:

God’s Accommodation of Human Desire

David’s heart burned to build a house for God (2 Samuel 7:2-3), yet God clarified, “Shalt thou build me an house for me to dwell in? Whereas I have not dwelt in any house since the time that I brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt” (2 Samuel 7:5-6, KJV). God’s transcendence cannot be confined (1 Kings 8:27), and He preferred the tabernacle’s mobility, symbolizing His presence among His people (Exodus 25:8). However, God permitted Solomon to build the temple, not because He required it, but to accommodate David’s zeal and Israel’s cultural expectation for a fixed worship center, akin to neighboring nations.

This accommodation mirrors God’s pattern of working within human limitations. For instance, God allowed kingship despite it being a rejection of His direct rule (1 Samuel 8:7), knowing Israel’s monarchy would falter. Similarly, the temple was a concession to human expression of devotion, but God foreknew its impermanence and defilement (Jeremiah 7:4-14). Solomon, as David’s son, was chosen to fulfill this human-driven project, reflecting God’s willingness to engage with His people’s imperfect efforts while steering them toward eternal truths.

2. Solomon’s Role as a Type and a Warning

Solomon was designated for the temple because his reign of peace, wisdom, and wealth (1 Kings 4:25; 10:27) typified a fleeting shadow of God’s kingdom, yet his failures underscored human inability to sustain divine ideals. God said to David, “Behold, a son shall be born to thee, who shall be a man of rest; and I will give him rest from all his enemies round about: for his name shall be Solomon, and I will give peace and quietness unto Israel in his days” (1 Chronicles 22:9, KJV). Solomon’s peaceful era suited the temple’s construction, contrasting David’s warrior status (1 Chronicles 22:8). The temple, a symbol of God’s presence, required a builder untainted by bloodshed, aligning with Solomon’s early devotion (1 Kings 3:9-12).

However, Solomon’s later turn to foreign gods (1 Kings 11:4-8) and worldly excesses (Ecclesiastes 2:4-11) revealed the temple’s vulnerability. God knew Solomon’s heart would stray, as He warned, “If ye turn away, and forsake my statutes… then will I pluck them up by the roots out of my land… and this house, which I have sanctified… will I cast out of my sight” (2 Chronicles 7:19-20, KJV). Solomon’s idolatry led to the kingdom’s division (1 Kings 11:11-13), and the temple’s eventual defilement by apostate kings (2 Kings 21:4-7) and destruction by Babylon (2 Chronicles 36:19). Thus, Solomon’s designation served as a cautionary tale: even the wisest man, building God’s house, could not uphold divine holiness without steadfast obedience.

3. Foreshadowing the True Temple

The deepest reason for Solomon’s role lies in God’s redemptive plan. The temple, though defiled and destroyed, was a temporary type pointing to Jesus Christ, the true temple (John 2:19-21). God allowed Solomon to build a flawed structure to teach Israel—and humanity—that no earthly edifice could contain His glory or endure human sin. The temple’s history of defilement (e.g., Ezekiel 8:6-16) and destruction fulfilled God’s warnings (Jeremiah 7:14), exposing the need for a perfect, eternal dwelling place for God among men.

Solomon’s mixed legacy—wisdom tainted by worldliness—mirrors the temple’s duality: a place of divine encounter yet prone to corruption. God chose Solomon, knowing his failures, to illustrate that human efforts, even at their peak, fall short. The temple’s destruction paved the way for the prophecy of a restored tabernacle in the millennial reign (Amos 9:11; Zechariah 14:16), fulfilled in Christ’s reign, where God tabernacles with humanity (Revelation 21:3). Solomon’s temple, defiled by his own idolatry, was a steppingstone in God’s plan to reveal “the tabernacle of God is with men” (Revelation 21:3, KJV).

4. Sovereign Use of Flawed Vessels

God’s choice of Solomon reflects His sovereignty in using imperfect vessels to accomplish His will. Solomon’s early humility (1 Kings 3:7) and prayer at the temple’s dedication (1 Kings 8:22-53) glorified God, yet his later apostasy (1 Kings 11:9-10) ensured the temple’s defilement. God’s foreknowledge of this outcome (Deuteronomy 31:16-21) did not thwart His purpose. Instead, He used Solomon’s reign to establish the temple as a temporary covenant symbol, knowing its destruction would humble Israel and point to the need for a Savior (Daniel 9:26-27).

The temple’s construction under Solomon also fulfilled God’s promise to David (2 Samuel 7:12-13), demonstrating divine faithfulness despite human failure. By allowing a worldly king to build a doomed structure, God underscored His grace: He works through fallen humanity to advance His redemptive plan, ultimately replacing the temple with Christ’s body (John 2:21) and the church (1 Corinthians 3:16). End Quote.

Regarding the MINGLED Wine of Proverbs 9:5:

Analysis: Is Proverbs 9:5’s Mingled Wine Symbolically Linked to These Verses?

To determine if Proverbs 9:5’s mingled wine is symbolic of Matthew 27:34, Leviticus 2:4, and John 19:39, we need to assess whether the “mingled” substances share a common symbolic theme. The word “mingled” varies in its Hebrew and Greek roots (masak, balal, kerannumi, migma), and its meaning depends on context. Let’s evaluate the connections and whether they provide “proof” of a shared symbolism.

1. Commonality of “Mingled” as Preparation

Proverbs 9:5: The mingled wine (masak) is prepared by Wisdom, likely mixed with water or spices to make it suitable for drinking. It symbolizes divine provision and nourishment.
Leviticus 2:4: The flour mingled (balal) with oil is carefully prepared as a holy offering, symbolizing consecration and worship.
John 19:39: The mixture (migma) of myrrh and aloes is prepared for Jesus’ burial, symbolizing honor and sanctity.
Matthew 27:34: The vinegar mingled (kerannumi) with gall is prepared as a drink, though its purpose (sedation or mockery) and Jesus’ refusal give it a negative connotation.

Observation: In Proverbs 9:5, Leviticus 2:4, and John 19:39, “mingled” refers to intentional preparation for a sacred or positive purpose (nourishment, worship, burial). In Matthew 27:34, the mingling is preparatory but associated with suffering and rejection, making it distinct. The shared theme of preparation suggests a partial connection, but the purposes differ.

2. Symbolic Alignment with Christ

Proverbs 9:5: The mingled wine, as part of Wisdom’s feast, prefigures Christ’s offer of Himself as the bread and wine of the new covenant (Matthew 26:26–28). Wisdom is a type of Christ (1 Corinthians 1:24), and her wine symbolizes spiritual life.
Leviticus 2:4: The grain offering mingled with oil foreshadows Christ’s perfect offering (Hebrews 10:5–10). Oil symbolizes the Holy Spirit, and the offering points to Jesus’ consecrated life and sacrifice.
John 19:39: The mixture of myrrh and aloes honors Christ’s body, reflecting His sacrificial death. Myrrh, associated with suffering and burial (Mark 15:23), ties to Jesus’ redemptive work.
Matthew 27:34: The mingled vinegar and gall symbolize the bitterness of Christ’s suffering (Psalm 69:21, “They gave me also gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink”). While prophetic, this drink contrasts with the Eucharistic wine, as Jesus refuses it, emphasizing His full endurance of the cross.

Observation: Proverbs 9:5, Leviticus 2:4, and John 19:39 align symbolically with Christ’s redemptive work (nourishment, consecration, burial). Matthew 27:34 also relates to Christ but emphasizes suffering and rejection, not nourishment or honor. The positive symbolism in Proverbs, Leviticus, and John contrasts with the negative tone of Matthew.

Proverbs 9:17 (KJV)

“Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant.”

Context of Proverbs 9:17

Proverbs 9 contrasts two personified figures: Wisdom (9:1–6) and Folly (9:13–18). Each invites the simple to a feast, representing competing paths in life:

Wisdom offers bread and mingled wine (9:5), symbolizing divine truth, understanding, and life (9:6). Her invitation is open, honorable, and leads to righteousness.
Folly, described as “clamorous” and “simple” (9:13), offers “stolen waters” and “bread eaten in secret” (9:17), symbolizing sinful pleasures that are enticing but lead to death (9:18).

Proverbs 9:17 is part of Folly’s seductive invitation, targeting the naive who pass by (9:15–16). The verse uses vivid imagery to depict the allure of forbidden pleasures, but the subsequent verse (9:18) warns of their deadly consequences: “But he knoweth not that the dead are there; and that her guests are in the depths of hell.”

Analysis of Proverbs 9:17

Let’s break down the verse’s components, meaning, and symbolism:

“Stolen waters”:

Literal Meaning: In the ancient Near East, water was a precious resource, and stealing it was a serious offense. “Stolen waters” suggests something illicitly obtained, adding to its allure due to its forbidden nature.
Symbolic Meaning: The phrase likely represents sinful indulgences, particularly those that are secretive or transgressive. Many scholars interpret “stolen waters” as a metaphor for adultery or sexual immorality, given the personification of Folly as a seductive woman (cf. Proverbs 5:15–20, where “waters” symbolize sexual fidelity within marriage). However, it can also broadly signify any illicit pleasure—greed, deceit, or idolatry—that tempts people away from God’s path.
Cultural Appeal: The sweetness of “stolen waters” reflects the human tendency to find forbidden things enticing, a psychological truth Solomon emphasizes to warn against temptation.

“Bread eaten in secret”:

Literal Meaning: Bread consumed covertly implies secrecy, possibly to avoid detection or shame. It contrasts with Wisdom’s open, communal feast (9:5).
Symbolic Meaning: This reinforces the theme of hidden sin, suggesting pleasures pursued in defiance of God’s law or social norms. Like “stolen waters,” it may point to adultery (e.g., Job 31:27 mentions secret sin), but it can also represent any covert act of rebellion against God, such as idolatry or dishonesty.
Seductive Nature: The “pleasantness” of secret bread highlights the deceptive appeal of sin, which seems enjoyable in the moment but hides its destructive consequences.

Personification of Folly:

Folly is depicted as a “clamorous” woman who lacks wisdom (9:13), sitting at the door of her house and calling out to passersby (9:14–15). Her invitation mimics Wisdom’s but is marked by deceit and sensuality.
The imagery aligns with other warnings in Proverbs about the “strange woman” or adulteress (e.g., Proverbs 5:3–5, 7:10–27), who lures men to destruction. Folly’s seductive tactics symbolize the world’s temptations, which promise pleasure but deliver ruin.

Consequences (9:18):

The verse immediately following reveals the true outcome of Folly’s invitation: her guests end up among the “dead” in the “depths of hell” (Hebrew: Sheol, the grave or place of the dead). This stark warning underscores that the sweetness of stolen waters and secret bread is fleeting, leading to spiritual and physical death.
The contrast with Wisdom’s life-giving feast (9:6, 11) emphasizes the binary choice between God’s truth and worldly temptation.

Using The Third Heaven Traveler Blogs with Amber’s commentary analysis based on the KJV Grok XAI Beta 3 👍

King Solomon Type and Shadow of the AntiChrist

https://youtu.be/z3V85BgikWM?si=bRFlleqfo1QtONoX

Andrew’s commentary:

Amber commentary: Quote:

“I listened to your show on solomon and immediately subscribed because very few people speak on this.

The Holy Spirit revealed to me that Donald Trump is a type of antichrist or the anti christ and I always heard that the Bible interprets itself. If the Bible interprets itself then we should ALL be led to the only other scripture with 666 and it’s directly tied to Solomon. My biblical knowledge is not that extensive and I am working hard to change that but here are some surface things I have written down to link Trump and Solomon.

I enjoy your extensive biblical Qso a deeper dive on Solomon and the black girl (that the devil possibly usurped) and luciferians worship the black Madonna. I’ve heard stories that loooong ago the Catholic Church would have normal services on the first floor and the Freemasons and such would be below worshipping a different God and the black virgin. Thank you for allowing me this outlet as most people wouldn’t want to discuss these things.

Also I just read proverbs 9 today and I had to google who wrote it and the answer was Solomon! I was totally blown away! I read 9:5 and 9:17 over and over again.

The wine is mingled The stolen bread…. Woah!!!” End Quote.

Amber comments:

I raise the question: could Solomon be guilty of blaspheming the Holy Spirit and taking the Lord’s name in vain claiming that his wisdom came from God? Many pastors do the same thing today!! Maybe he started on the right path with God but his thirst for wisdom surpassed his thirst for God.

Jesus Christ is Wisdom; the Queen of Heaven is the antichrist counterfeit #doctrinematters #kjvonly

https://youtu.be/1kg34h_Y9oM?si=GwHTrtnhmgrXnIVf

This is SO Important!! I think you connected a lot of dots here. Jesus is the true light and the Queen of heaven is the false light!! I’ll go back to what brought me to your channel in the first place… Solomon as a type of antichrist I truly believe he did not have the root of Jesus and that is why his women led him to their gods. He sought after wisdom from the queen of heaven and not from Jesus! What a deep lesson we all must learn from this! We must make sure we are rooted in Jesus and following the true light! If it is on your heart to do so, I would LOVE another video on Solomon as an antichrist following the false light.

The idea of King Solomon as a "type" or foreshadowing of the Antichrist is a provocative interpretation that draws from biblical texts, historical context, and theological speculation. Amber's commentary, as shared, reflects a personal exploration of this concept, connecting Solomon’s life, choices, and biblical descriptions to characteristics often associated with the Antichrist in Christian eschatology. Below, I’ll address the key points raised, provide a balanced analysis grounded in Scripture, and respond to the specific questions and connections Amber makes, including the links to Donald Trump, the Queen of Heaven, and the broader spiritual implications.

Please read this scripture.

I cannot help but to think that Solomon may have been the certain rich man.

Also his name Solomon is mentioned in this chapter comparing him to the Lillies and falling short

Food for thought: could the blasphemy of the holy spirit refer to someone claiming to receive wisdom from God but using other forces to attain it? Using God’s name in vain?

1. Solomon as a Type of the Antichrist

Biblical Context of Solomon:

Wisdom and Early Faith: Solomon began his reign with humility, seeking wisdom from God (1 Kings 3:5-14). God granted him unparalleled wisdom, wealth, and honor, and he initially followed the God of Israel, building the temple (1 Kings 6-8).
Apostasy and Idolatry: Later, Solomon’s heart turned from God due to his many foreign wives (700 wives and 300 concubines, 1 Kings 11:1-8). He built altars to pagan gods like Ashtoreth, Chemosh, and Molech, leading Israel into idolatry (1 Kings 11:9-13). This is a key point for those who see him as a "type" of the Antichrist, as it mirrors the deception and apostasy associated with the Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4).
The 666 Connection: Amber references the number 666, which appears in 1 Kings 10:14, where Solomon received 666 talents of gold annually. This is one of the few explicit mentions of 666 in the Old Testament, and Revelation 13:18 links 666 to the "number of the beast" (Antichrist). Some interpreters see this as a symbolic connection, suggesting Solomon’s wealth and worldly power prefigure the Antichrist’s economic dominance.

Type and Shadow:

In biblical theology, a "type" is a person, event, or institution that foreshadows a greater reality (e.g., Moses as a type of Christ). The Antichrist is described as a figure who deceives, exalts himself, and leads people astray (Daniel 11:36-39, 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12, Revelation 13). Solomon’s trajectory—starting with divine favor but ending in idolatry—can be seen as a partial type of the Antichrist, particularly in his:

Worldly Power: Solomon’s wealth, military strength, and global influence (1 Kings 4:21-24) resemble the Antichrist’s predicted dominion (Revelation 13:7).
Idolatry: His worship of false gods parallels the Antichrist’s promotion of a false religion (Revelation 13:11-15).
Unrepentant Heart: Amber notes that Scripture does not explicitly record Solomon’s repentance. While Ecclesiastes (attributed to Solomon) expresses regret and a return to fearing God (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14), it’s ambiguous whether this reflects true repentance. This lack of clarity fuels speculation that Solomon’s legacy is tainted.

Counterarguments:

Solomon is also a type of Christ in some respects, particularly in his wisdom, peaceable reign, and temple-building, which prefigure Christ’s role as the true King and builder of the spiritual temple * (John 2:19-21, Ephesians 2:19-22). His early faithfulness complicates the Antichrist typology.
The 666 talents of gold may simply be a historical detail, not a deliberate foreshadowing. Contextually, it highlights Solomon’s wealth, not necessarily a demonic connection. *
The absence of recorded repentance doesn’t mean Solomon didn’t repent. Jewish and Christian traditions often view him as a tragic but redeemable figure, with Ecclesiastes suggesting a return to God.

Temple

https://youtu.be/xTjpBX701kQ?si=W-7HTmAPXw3_Irw4

America First

https://youtu.be/xdsQv4BVDVk?si=VD2sIIDLX2tXO14M

Though I am not denying that the seven heads and ten horns of the beasts represent the successive kingdoms over time , one could also see how one body with many heads consisting of the unification of the world religions form spiritually such a body of a beast, with 7 heads and 10 horns carrying the meaning of completeness or the whole.

Amber’s Perspective: Amber’s view emphasizes Solomon’s failure to remain rooted in the true God, seeing his pursuit of wisdom and wealth as ultimately corrupted by pagan influences, particularly through women.* This aligns with her broader concern about the "Jezebel spirit" and the "Queen of Heaven" as deceptive forces. The connection to 666 and Solomon’s idolatry is compelling to her as a scriptural clue, especially when paired with Revelation’s description of the Antichrist.

earthly kingdom. He is King of Heaven and earth, not like the kings of the earth who choose carnal things and the things of this world.

Andrew’s comment: Literally and biblically - David married Bathsheba afterwards before Solomon's birth - Solomon was NOT a bastard, However, he was definitely a SPIRITUAL BASTARD. But regarding being in Judaism a strange twist happened during the Rabbinic Jews observations by the “tradition of man” and NOT after Christ (Colossians 2:8,9) - The Torah is clear Solomon is a “spiritual” bastard because of his idolatry, but the Tanakh paints him as cleansed:

What this means is JEWISH TRADITION OF MAN lifts up Solomon however spiritually he is a bastard.

Look at Amber’s Comment sent to me as I was writing about Solomon is NOT legitimate (even though in the “heritage of Jesus” see Matthew Chapter One, he is no different than Judas - called and chosen by Jesus Christ as one of the 12 disciples in charge of the treasury. THINGS OF THIS WORLD ARE NOT OF GOD.

See my study WHY I HATE MY LIFE IN THIS WORLD.

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/05/i-hate-my-life-in-this-world-with-all.html

Amber’s comment:

I sent you a video on national prayer day when Donald Trump brought on stage every pastor, priest, bishop and all sorts of other religious leaders and let them all pray to their God.

This is what my spiritual eyes saw…

Donald Trump (Solomon) and women (Paula white) bringing in the worship of false gods to the USA (Jerusalem)*

I am currently reading and re reading Luke 12 over and over again.

The depths of this scripture is taking my breath away. I am reflecting on the parable of a certain rich man and also the verse that compares Solomon to the Lillies.

I am also reminded of the fact that it is referenced somewhere that the queen of the south traveled such a distance to see Solomon but a greater than Solomon is here now and no one seemed to care.

Someone will come in their own name and be accepted.

This has happened to my family with Trump

Specifically one member.

Trump has taken the seat in her temple.

The Tanakh, particularly 1 Kings 11, is largely honest with the Torah in condemning Solomon’s evil, explicitly detailing his idolatry and its consequences in alignment with Deuteronomy 7:3–4 and 28:15–68. However, Chronicles’ selective focus on his positive contributions softens this portrayal, creating ambiguity. Rabbinic Judaism is less honest, mitigating Solomon’s sin through denial of personal idolatry, repentance narratives, and justifications, reflecting a biased perception to preserve his legacy as a wise king and Temple builder. In contrast, the King James Bible presents a starkly negative view of Solomon after his apostasy, consistent with the Torah’s standards, unmitigated by redemption narratives and reinforced by Christian theology.

*Expose Darkness Comment:Yes that is right. Trump is like the beloved Solomon who is going into the excess of the final days of the golden age of the kingdom of David. After that the big split occurred and Israel fully apostatised under Jeroboam, who made the false altar and became an enemy to Judah under Rehoboam. Could it mean that most of America's Christians are going to follow the New Ecumenical Religion and a small minority will remain as Zionist Israel supporters. (modern Judah). Both Trump and Paula support both Ecumenism and Zionism in their personal religious make up.

The Chabad Lubbavitchers teach that the USA is spiritually ISRAEL today. They believe greater Israel will be all the world. They understand that national Israel is only a physical manifestation of something spiritual and I believe they needed to make Israel outwardly visible as part of bringing about the the strong delusion in the church. So Amber is right in what she sees about the idolatry being done in the USA is as if done in Israel.

When the pope of Rome stood in your senate house I thought that was a modern day example of an abomination standing where it ought not.

Another abomination was when Obama put the rainbow on the white house. That is the moment when I knew a line had been crossed in this world, and the whole world was going the way of South Africa.

There were also these strange moments in South Africa where lines were crossed, for example in 2010 there was the World cup soccer in South Africa and they had a witch doctor (a shaman) lead a ritual slaughter of a beast in the opening ceremony. That was a moment we knew it was crossing a line and we knew what it meant. It meant desolation was coming.

2. Solomon and the Queen of Heaven

The Queen of Heaven in Scripture:

The "Queen of Heaven" appears in Jeremiah 7:18 and 44:17-19, referring to a pagan goddess (likely Ishtar/Ashtoreth) worshipped by Israelites through offerings. This cult was associated with fertility, sensuality, and idolatry, and it’s condemned by God.
Amber connects this to Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5), suggesting his wisdom was corrupted by a feminine, demonic counterfeit—possibly the "Queen of Heaven." She also references the Wisdom of Solomon (an apocryphal text), where wisdom is personified as feminine ("her"), which she finds unsettling and potentially demonic.

Wisdom as Feminine:

In Proverbs (attributed to Solomon), wisdom is personified as a woman (Proverbs 8-9), calling people to follow God’s truth. This is a literary device, not a literal deity. Proverbs 9:5 ("Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the wine which I have mingled") contrasts with the folly of the "foolish woman" (Proverbs 9:17, "Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant"), which Amber sees as sinister. These verses likely contrast divine wisdom with seductive folly, not the Queen of Heaven explicitly.
In the apocryphal Wisdom of Solomon, wisdom is heavily personified as a divine feminine figure, which some Christians find problematic due to its mystical tone and non-canonical status. Amber’s discomfort with this text may stem from its divergence from the canonical portrayal of wisdom.

Jesus as True Wisdom:

Amber asserts that Jesus Christ is the true wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24, 30), and any feminine or pagan wisdom (e.g., Queen of Heaven) is a counterfeit. This aligns with New Testament theology, where Christ is the embodiment of God’s wisdom, contrasting with worldly or demonic wisdom (James 3:15-17).
The "false light" Amber mentions likely refers to Satan’s deception as an "angel of light" (2 Corinthians 11:14), which she ties to the Queen of Heaven and Solomon’s idolatry.

Connection to the Antichrist:

The Antichrist is associated with deception and a false religion (Revelation 13:11-15). If Solomon’s idolatry involved the Queen of Heaven (As...

Please do a deep analysis on King Solomon as a type of the antichist

The interpretation of King Solomon as a "type" or foreshadowing of the Antichrist is a compelling and complex theological perspective that draws from biblical texts, historical context, and symbolic connections. This analysis will explore the scriptural basis for this view, focusing on Solomon’s life, actions, and legacy in the King James Bible (KJV), while addressing key characteristics that align with the Antichrist as described in prophetic scriptures. It will also consider counterarguments, Amber’s specific points (e.g., the 666 connection, idolatry, and lack of repentance), and the broader spiritual implications, including references to the "Queen of Heaven" and the "Jezebel spirit." The response will remain grounded in Scripture, avoid speculation beyond textual evidence, and provide a balanced perspective.

1. Understanding "Type" and the Antichrist

In biblical theology, a "type" is a person, event, or institution in the Old Testament that prefigures a future reality in the New Testament or eschatology. For example, Moses is a type of Christ as a deliverer (Deuteronomy 18:15), and the Passover lamb foreshadows Christ’s sacrifice (1 Corinthians 5:7). The Antichrist, as described in Scripture (Daniel 7:8, 11:36-39; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12; Revelation 13:1-18), is a figure who:

Deceives nations with charisma and false signs (Revelation 13:13-14).
Exalts himself above God, promoting idolatry (2 Thessalonians 2:4).
Wields economic and political power (Revelation 13:16-18).
Leads people into apostasy, opposing God’s truth (1 John 2:18).

To view Solomon as a type of the Antichrist, his life must reflect patterns that mirror these traits, particularly in a way that contrasts with Christ, the true King and Wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24). Below, we’ll examine Solomon’s life through this lens, focusing on key scriptural evidence.

2. Scriptural Evidence for Solomon as a Type of the Antichrist

Solomon’s reign, as detailed in 1 Kings 1-11 and 2 Chronicles 1-9 (KJV), begins with divine favor but ends in spiritual failure. Several aspects of his life align with characteristics of the Antichrist:

A. The 666 Connection

Scripture: “Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold” (1 Kings 10:14; 2 Chronicles 9:13).
Significance: The number 666 is rare in the Old Testament but prominent in Revelation 13:18, where it is “the number of the beast” and associated with the Antichrist’s economic control (“no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark,” Revelation 13:17). Solomon’s annual receipt of 666 talents of gold symbolizes immense wealth and worldly power, potentially foreshadowing the Antichrist’s economic dominance.
Analysis: In context, 666 talents (approximately 25 tons of gold) underscores Solomon’s prosperity, which was a divine blessing (1 Kings 3:13). However, his accumulation of wealth, horses, and wives violated God’s commands for kings (Deuteronomy 17:16-17), suggesting a shift from stewardship to self-exaltation. This mirrors the Antichrist’s use of wealth to consolidate power (Daniel 11:38). Amber highlights this connection as a scriptural clue, noting that the Bible “interprets itself” by linking 666 to both figures.

B. Apostasy and Idolatry

Scripture: “For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites” (1 Kings 11:4-5).
Significance: Solomon’s worship of pagan gods, including Ashtoreth (a fertility goddess linked to the “Queen of Heaven” in Jeremiah 7:18), Chemosh, and Molech, represents a profound apostasy. He built high places for these idols (1 Kings 11:7), leading Israel into sin (1 Kings 11:9-11). The Antichrist is similarly described as exalting himself “above all that is called God” and promoting a false religion (2 Thessalonians 2:4; Revelation 13:11-15).
Analysis: Solomon’s idolatry, influenced by his foreign wives, parallels the Antichrist’s deceptive allure, drawing people away from true worship. Amber connects this to the “Jezebel spirit,” a term derived from Jezebel’s idolatry and seduction (1 Kings 16:31; Revelation 2:20), suggesting that Solomon’s susceptibility to feminine pagan influences (e.g., Ashtoreth) mirrors the Antichrist’s spiritual seduction. The “Queen of Heaven” reference strengthens this, as Ashtoreth’s cult involved sensual and idolatrous practices, akin to the “mystery, Babylon the great” in Revelation 17:5.

C. Worldly Power and Deception

Scripture: “And Solomon reigned over all kingdoms from the river unto the land of the Philistines, and unto the border of Egypt… And he had peace on all sides round about him” (1 Kings 4:21, 24).
Significance: Solomon’s global influence, wealth, and peaceful reign made him a figure of awe (1 Kings 10:23-24). The Queen of Sheba’s visit (1 Kings 10:1-13) highlights his charisma and wisdom, which drew admiration. The Antichrist is depicted as a charismatic leader who deceives nations with “great signs” and “lying wonders” (2 Thessalonians 2:9; Revelation 13:13).
Analysis: Solomon’s early wisdom was God-given (1 Kings 3:12), but his later reliance on wealth, alliances (e.g., marrying Pharaoh’s daughter, 1 Kings 3:1), and pagan practices suggests a shift toward self-glorification. This trajectory resembles the Antichrist, who initially appears as a “man of peace” (Daniel 8:25) but leads to destruction. Amber’s concern about Solomon seeking wisdom from the “Queen of Heaven” rather than Jesus reflects this deception, though anachronistic (Jesus is the New Testament revelation of wisdom, 1 Corinthians 1:30).

D. Lack of Repentance

Scripture: “And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the LORD God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice” (1 Kings 11:9).
Significance: Unlike David, who repented after sin (Psalm 51), Scripture does not explicitly record Solomon’s repentance. His idolatry led to God’s judgment: the kingdom would be divided after his death (1 Kings 11:11-13). The Antichrist is characterized by unrepentant defiance, “speaking great things” against God (Daniel 7:25; Revelation 13:5).
Analysis: Amber emphasizes Solomon’s unrepentant heart, noting that his failure to return to God disqualifies him as a figure to revere. Ecclesiastes, traditionally attributed to Solomon, expresses regret and a call to “fear God, and keep his commandments” (Ecclesiastes 12:13), but its tone is ambiguous, and repentance is not explicit. This ambiguity supports the view of Solomon as a cautionary figure whose spiritual fall aligns with the Antichrist’s rebellion.

E. Feminine Influence and the “Jezebel Spirit”

Scripture: “But king Solomon loved many strange women… And his wives turned away his heart” (1 Kings 11:1, 3).
Significance: Solomon’s 700 wives and 300 concubines, many from pagan nations, led him into idolatry. This influence is seen as a type of spiritual seduction, akin to the “Jezebel spirit” (Revelation 2:20), which deceives believers into sin. The Antichrist’s system, symbolized by “Babylon the great,” is depicted as a seductive harlot (Revelation 17:1-5).
Analysis: Amber connects Solomon’s susceptibility to his wives with the broader theme of feminine deception, citing the “Queen of Heaven” and the Wisdom of Solomon’s feminine personification of wisdom as potentially demonic. In Proverbs 8-9, wisdom is personified as a virtuous woman, contrasting with the “foolish woman” of folly (Proverbs 9:13-17). However, the apocryphal Wisdom of Solomon (not in the KJV canon) portrays wisdom in mystical, feminine terms that some find unsettling. Amber’s fear that Solomon’s wisdom came from a demonic source may overreach, but his idolatry through feminine influence supports the Antichrist typology.

3. Solomon as a Type of Christ: A Counterperspective

While the Antichrist typology is compelling, Solomon is also traditionally seen as a type of Christ, particularly in his:

Wisdom: Solomon’s God-given wisdom (1 Kings 3:12) prefigures Christ, “in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3).
Temple-Building: Solomon’s temple (1 Kings 6-8) foreshadows Christ’s spiritual temple, the church (John 2:19-21; Ephesians 2:19-22).
Peaceful Reign: His reign of peace (1 Kings 4:24) mirrors Christ’s millennial kingdom (Isaiah 9:7).

Reconciling the Typologies:

Solomon’s life can be seen as a dual type: early in his reign, he reflects Christ’s wisdom and kingship; later, his apostasy and worldly excess align with the Antichrist. This duality underscores the biblical theme of human potential for both divine calling and catastrophic failure (e.g., Saul, Judas).
The 666 connection may be incidental, as the number in 1 Kings 10:14 is a historical detail, not explicitly tied to evil. However, its rarity and resonance with Revelation 13:18 invite symbolic interpretation.
Solomon’s temple and wealth were initially for God’s glory, unlike the Antichrist’s self-exaltation. His fall came through personal sin, not a deliberate rejection of God like the Antichrist’s (2 Thessalonians 2:3).

4. Amber’s Specific Points and Questions

A. Solomon and Donald Trump

Amber draws parallels between Solomon and Donald Trump, citing shared traits: marrying foreign women, obsession with gold, building projects, military strength, earthly treasures, temple-building (Trump’s symbolic support for Israel), and lack of repentance. She references Trump’s public statements about not seeking forgiveness, seeing him as a modern “type” of the Antichrist or the Antichrist himself.

Analysis:

Similarities: Both figures are charismatic, wealthy, and influential, with a flair for grand projects. Solomon’s gold and Trump’s branding (e.g., gold-plated aesthetics) evoke materialism. Solomon’s foreign wives and Trump’s marriages to non-American women (e.g., Melania) could be seen as parallel, though this is circumstantial. Both wielded significant political power, and Amber’s claim about Trump’s lack of repentance aligns with Solomon’s unrecorded repentance.
Differences: Solomon’s idolatry involved literal pagan worship, while Trump’s actions are not explicitly religious in this sense. The Antichrist is a global, eschatological figure with supernatural deception (Revelation 13:13), which doesn’t fully align with Trump’s political persona. The comparison is speculative and relies on symbolic rather than direct evidence.
Biblical Caution: Scripture warns against hastily identifying the Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2:3 requires a clear “falling away” and revelation of the “man of sin”). While types can be identified, claiming Trump as the Antichrist exceeds biblical evidence and risks sensationalism.

B. The Wisdom of Solomon and Feminine Wisdom

Amber expresses discomfort with the apocryphal Wisdom of Solomon, where wisdom is personified as “her” and seems demonic. She contrasts this with Jesus as true wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24).

Analysis:

Canonical Wisdom: In Proverbs 8-9 (KJV), wisdom is a feminine personification of God’s attribute, not a deity. Proverbs 9:5 (“Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the wine which I have mingled”) invites people to God’s truth, contrasting with the seductive folly of Proverbs 9:17 (“Stolen waters are sweet”). These are literary metaphors, not references to the “Queen of Heaven.”
Apocryphal Wisdom: The Wisdom of Solomon, part of the Apocrypha, portrays wisdom as a divine feminine figure with mystical qualities (Wisdom 7:22-30). This text is not in the KJV canon and is rejected by most Protestants, which may explain Amber’s unease. Its tone could be misread as aligning with pagan goddess worship, but it reflects Hellenistic Jewish thought, not Satanism.
Jesus as Wisdom: Amber’s view that Jesus is true wisdom is biblically sound (1 Corinthians 1:30; Colossians 2:3). Any feminine wisdom deviating from Christ could be seen as a counterfeit, but Solomon’s canonical writings (Proverbs, Ecclesiastes) align with God’s truth, not demonic sources.

C. The Black Girl and the Black Madonna

Amber references the “black girl” in Song of Solomon 1:5-6 (“I am black, but comely… because the sun hath looked upon me”) and connects it to the “Black Madonna” worshipped by Luciferians and Freemasons. She suggests the devil “usurped” this figure.

Analysis:

Song of Solomon: The “black girl” is the Shulamite woman, whose darkened skin comes from vineyard labor (Song of Solomon 1:6). The “tents of Kedar” and “curtains of Solomon” (1:5) symbolize her rugged beauty and regal worth. There’s no textual link to Satan or the Antichrist, but her beauty could be allegorically misappropriated in pagan contexts.
Black Madonna: In Catholic tradition, Black Madonnas are icons of Mary with dark skin, often tied to local miracles or cultural depictions. Some esoteric groups (e.g., Freemasons, as Amber notes) may reinterpret these figures in occult ways, but this is not mainstream Catholicism. The “Queen of Heaven” in Jeremiah 7:18 is a pagan goddess, not Mary, though some critics conflate the two.
Connection: Amber’s concern about Luciferian worship may stem from conspiracy theories linking Catholic icons to paganism. While Solomon’s idolatry (e.g., Ashtoreth) aligns with the “Queen of Heaven,” the Black Madonna is a later phenomenon, not directly tied to Solomon. The Shulamite’s beauty is a positive image in Scripture, not a demonic one.

D. Solomon’s Ascension to the Throne

Amber questions whether Solomon’s mother, Bathsheba, and Nathan tricked David into naming Solomon king over Adonijah (1 Kings 1:11-31), wondering if Solomon was a “usurper.”

Analysis:

Scriptural Account: Adonijah, David’s eldest surviving son, attempted to seize the throne without David’s approval (1 Kings 1:5-10). Bathsheba and Nathan informed David, who reaffirmed his oath that Solomon would succeed him (1 Kings 1:17, 30). This oath likely stemmed from God’s choice (1 Chronicles 22:9-10, where God names Solomon as the temple-builder).
God’s Will: Solomon’s anointing was divinely ordained (2 Chronicles 1:1), and his reign fulfilled God’s promise to David (2 Samuel 7:12-13). There’s no textual evidence of trickery; Bathsheba and Nathan acted to uphold David’s intent against Adonijah’s rebellion.
Typology: If Solomon is a type of the Antichrist, his contested ascension could mirror the Antichrist’s rise through deception (Daniel 8:25). However, the text portrays Solomon’s kingship as legitimate, not usurped.

5. Spiritual Implications and Lessons

The view of Solomon as a type of the Antichrist highlights several spiritual lessons:

The Danger of Apostasy: Solomon’s fall shows how even the wisest can be led astray by worldly allure (1 Corinthians 10:12). The Antichrist’s deception will exploit similar vulnerabilities (Matthew 24:24).
True vs. False Wisdom: Amber’s emphasis on Jesus as true wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24) contrasts with Solomon’s later reliance on pagan influences. Believers must test all wisdom against Scripture (1 John 4:1).
The Jezebel Spirit: The influence of Solomon’s wives parallels the seductive power of false religion, whether through the “Queen of Heaven” or modern idolatry. Revelation 2:20 warns against tolerating such deception.
Repentance: Solomon’s unclear repentance underscores the need for genuine turning to God (Acts 3:19). The Antichrist’s defiance contrasts with Christ’s call to humility (Matthew 11:29).

6. Conclusion

King Solomon can be seen as a partial type of the Antichrist due to his 666 talents of gold, apostasy, idolatry, worldly power, and unrecorded repentance, which mirror the Antichrist’s deception, rebellion, and dominance. His susceptibility to pagan feminine influences, particularly Ashtoreth (linked to the “Queen of Heaven”), strengthens this typology, as does his trajectory from divine favor to spiritual failure. However, Solomon’s early faithfulness, temple-building, and possible late-life reflection (Ecclesiastes) also make him a type of Christ, creating a dual typology that reflects human complexity.

Amber’s connections to Donald Trump, the Black Madonna, and the Wisdom of Solomon are thought-provoking but speculative, requiring caution to avoid overreaching beyond Scripture. The “black girl” in Song of Solomon is unrelated to demonic worship, and Solomon’s ascension was divinely ordained, not usurped. The broader lesson is to remain rooted in Jesus, the true Wisdom, and to guard against deception, as Solomon’s life warns.

For further study, Amber could explore:

Proverbs 8-9 vs. Revelation 17 to contrast true and false wisdom.
Jeremiah 7 and 44 to understand the “Queen of Heaven” in context.
Revelation 13 and Daniel 11 to clarify the Antichrist’s traits.

Note: If Amber wishes to forget or manage this conversation’s memory, she can click the book icon beneath the message, select this chat from the menu, and remove it. To disable memory entirely, she can go to the “Data Controls” section in settings.

Do DeepSearch

please connect the MASONIC and illumaniti connection to solomon

8 posts

15 web pages

The connection between King Solomon, Freemasonry, and the Illuminati, particularly in the context of viewing Solomon as a type of the Antichrist, is a topic steeped in biblical interpretation, historical speculation, and conspiracy theories. This analysis will explore the Masonic and Illuminati connections to Solomon, grounded in scriptural references from the King James Bible (KJV), historical context, and relevant sources, while addressing Amber’s perspective on Solomon’s Antichrist typology. It will remain focused on factual and textual evidence, critically examining claims and avoiding unsubstantiated speculation. The response will integrate Amber’s concerns (e.g., Solomon’s idolatry, the 666 connection, and feminine influences) and address the Masonic and Illuminati links as they relate to this framework.

1. Solomon in Freemasonry: Symbolic and Allegorical Connections

Freemasonry, a fraternal organization with roots in medieval stonemason guilds, places significant emphasis on King Solomon and his temple as central symbols in its rituals and teachings. These connections are primarily allegorical, not historical, but they provide a foundation for understanding how Solomon is perceived in Masonic tradition and why some, like Amber, might link this to an Antichrist typology.

A. Solomon’s Temple and Masonic Ritual

Scriptural Basis: Solomon’s construction of the temple in Jerusalem (1 Kings 5-8; 2 Chronicles 2-7) is a focal point in Freemasonry. The temple represents spiritual and moral self-improvement, with its architecture symbolizing the “building” of a Mason’s character.
Hiram Abiff Legend: In Masonic lore, Hiram Abiff, the chief architect of Solomon’s temple (based on 1 Kings 7:13-14 and 2 Chronicles 2:13-14), is central to the Third Degree ritual. Hiram is murdered by three fellowcraft Masons seeking the “Master Mason’s secrets,” symbolizing fidelity and the inevitability of death. This allegory, introduced in the early 1720s, uses Solomon’s temple as a backdrop but is not biblically attested.
Masonic Symbolism: Masonic lodges are laid out to represent Solomon’s temple, with references to its pillars (Jachin and Boaz, 1 Kings 7:21) and the “porch” as the site of the first lodge. The “Great Architect of the Universe” (a Masonic term for God) is linked to Solomon’s role as a master builder.

B. Solomon as a Masonic Ideal

Wisdom and Leadership: Solomon’s God-given wisdom (1 Kings 3:12) and his role as a peaceful king (1 Kings 4:24) are admired in Freemasonry as models of enlightenment and moral leadership. Masons see Solomon as a historical figure whose temple-building reflects their pursuit of knowledge and virtue.
Esoteric Interpretations: Some Masonic texts, like Masonry in its Glory by David Austin (1799), portray Solomon’s temple as a prophetic symbol of God’s kingdom, with Freemasonry as a “subordinate building” to divine truth. This elevates Solomon’s legacy but avoids explicit religious claims, focusing on universal principles.

C. Connection to Antichrist Typology

Amber’s Perspective: Amber views Solomon’s later idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8) and the 666 talents of gold (1 Kings 10:14) as evidence of his fall into apostasy, aligning with the Antichrist’s deception and economic power (Revelation 13:18). In Masonic ritual, Solomon’s temple is glorified, but his personal sins are not emphasized, which Amber might see as sanitizing his legacy to obscure an Antichrist-like trajectory.
Masonic Critique: Some conspiracy theorists, echoed in Amber’s concerns about the “Jezebel spirit” and “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, 1 Kings 11:5), claim Freemasonry’s focus on Solomon conceals occult or anti-Christian motives. For example, posts on X assert that the “skull” in Masonic imagery represents a “false christ” or Antichrist, with Solomon’s temple as a symbol of esoteric deception. These claims lack primary source evidence but resonate with Amber’s view of Solomon’s idolatry as a warning.
Critical Analysis: Freemasonry’s use of Solomon is symbolic, not worshipful. The organization explicitly avoids religious doctrine, focusing on moral allegory. However, Solomon’s biblical fall—worshipping Ashtoreth and accumulating 666 talents—could be seen as a cautionary parallel to the Antichrist’s rebellion (2 Thessalonians 2:4), especially if one interprets Masonic rituals as glorifying Solomon’s worldly power over his spiritual failures.

2. The Illuminati: Historical and Speculative Links to Solomon

The Illuminati, particularly the Bavarian Illuminati founded by Adam Weishaupt in 1776, is a distinct entity from Freemasonry but is often conflated with it in conspiracy theories. Its connection to Solomon is less direct but emerges through alleged Masonic ties and esoteric interpretations.

A. Historical Context of the Illuminati

Origins: The Bavarian Illuminati was a secret society aimed at promoting Enlightenment ideals (reason, secularism) against Catholic and monarchical control. Weishaupt, a former Jesuit, modeled its structure on Masonic lodges, recruiting members from Freemasonry to spread influence. The group was banned in 1785, and its members dispersed.
No Direct Solomon Connection: Unlike Freemasonry, the Illuminati’s texts (e.g., Weishaupt’s writings) do not explicitly reference Solomon or his temple. Their focus was political and philosophical, not biblical allegory.

B. Alleged Masonic-Illuminati Overlap

Recruitment: Weishaupt infiltrated Masonic lodges to recruit influential members, leading to speculation that the Illuminati co-opted Masonic symbols, including those tied to Solomon’s temple. For example, the “Eye of Providence,” a Masonic symbol linked to the “Supreme Architect” and Solomon’s wisdom, is often misattributed to the Illuminati.
Conspiracy Theories: Books like Solomon’s Power Brokers by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler claim Freemasonry and the Illuminati are part of a “grand plan” to shape a “New World Order,” with Solomon’s temple as a symbolic blueprint for global control. These claims are speculative, lacking primary evidence, and are criticized even by reviewers for bias. Posts on X similarly assert that the Illuminati, through Freemasonry, uses Solomon’s legacy to promote a “false christ” or Antichrist agenda.
Critical Analysis: Historical records show the Illuminati was short-lived and distinct from Freemasonry, which predates it by centuries. Claims of a unified Masonic-Illuminati agenda tied to Solomon rely on unverified narratives, not documented rituals or texts.

C. Connection to Antichrist Typology

Amber’s Perspective: Amber’s concern about Solomon as an Antichrist type is amplified by conspiracy theories linking Freemasonry and the Illuminati to global deception, which she might see as an extension of Solomon’s idolatry and the 666 connection. The Illuminati’s secularism and alleged infiltration of Freemasonry could be interpreted as a modern parallel to Solomon’s turn to pagan gods (1 Kings 11:4-8), aligning with the Antichrist’s promotion of false religion (Revelation 13:11-15).
Speculative Links: The Illuminati’s goal of a “universal republic” without religious interference () could be seen as a secular counterfeit of God’s kingdom, much like Solomon’s temple, initially divine but later defiled by idolatry, could prefigure the Antichrist’s temple (2 Thessalonians 2:4). However, this is a symbolic, not historical, connection.
Critical Analysis: The Illuminati’s brief existence and lack of Solomon-specific references make direct links to an Antichrist typology tenuous. Amber’s concerns may stem from conflating Masonic veneration of Solomon with Illuminati conspiracy theories, which exaggerate both groups’ influence.

3. Integrating Amber’s Concerns: Solomon, Idolatry, and Antichrist

Amber’s commentary emphasizes Solomon’s spiritual fall—his idolatry through foreign wives (1 Kings 11:1-8), the 666 talents of gold (1 Kings 10:14), and lack of recorded repentance—as evidence of an Antichrist-like trajectory. She connects this to feminine deception (the “Jezebel spirit” and “Queen of Heaven”) and sees Masonic and Illuminati veneration of Solomon as potentially obscuring this warning.

A. Masonic Connection to Solomon’s Idolatry

Masonic Focus: Freemasonry highlights Solomon’s wisdom and temple-building, not his idolatry. Rituals like the Hiram Abiff legend emphasize moral lessons (fidelity, justice), not Solomon’s personal sins.
Amber’s Critique: Amber might argue that this selective focus glorifies Solomon’s worldly achievements (wealth, power, architecture) while ignoring his apostasy, mirroring the Antichrist’s deceptive allure (Revelation 13:13-14). The 666 talents, a biblical detail, are not mentioned in Masonic rituals, but their resonance with Revelation 13:18 fuels suspicion.
Jezebel Spirit: Amber’s reference to the “Jezebel spirit” (Revelation 2:20) ties to Solomon’s wives, who led him to worship Ashtoreth, the “Queen of Heaven” (1 Kings 11:5; Jeremiah 7:18). While Freemasonry is male-dominated, its esoteric symbols (e.g., the “All-Seeing Eye”) are sometimes linked by critics to feminine pagan deities, though this is speculative.

B. Illuminati and Deceptive Wisdom

Illuminati’s Enlightenment: The Illuminati’s promotion of secular “enlightenment” () could be seen as a counterfeit of Solomon’s God-given wisdom (1 Kings 3:12), which later turned to folly (Ecclesiastes 2:12-17). Amber’s concern about the Wisdom of Solomon (an apocryphal text) as demonic aligns with this, though the Illuminati did not use this text.
Antichrist Parallel: The Antichrist deceives through “lying wonders” (2 Thessalonians 2:9), much like Solomon’s initial wisdom drew admiration (1 Kings 10:1-9) but led to idolatry. If the Illuminati co-opted Masonic symbols tied to Solomon, as some claim (), this could be seen as a modern deception akin to the Antichrist’s false religion.
Critical Analysis: The Illuminati’s brief influence and lack of Solomon-specific focus make this connection symbolic at best. Amber’s view may reflect broader anxieties about secret societies distorting biblical truth.

C. The 666 Connection

Scriptural Link: Solomon’s 666 talents of gold (1 Kings 10:14) is a rare Old Testament reference to the number associated with the Antichrist (Revelation 13:18). Amber sees this as a scriptural clue tying Solomon to the Antichrist’s economic control.
Masonic and Illuminati Relevance: Neither Freemasonry nor the Illuminati explicitly reference 666 in their documented rituals or texts. However, conspiracy theories, like those in Solomon’s Power Brokers, claim Masonic symbols (e.g., the Seal of Solomon) and Illuminati agendas (e.g., global finance) align with this number’s eschatological significance.
Critical Analysis: The 666 talents are a historical detail in Scripture, not a Masonic or Illuminati doctrine. Amber’s interpretation is valid as a theological type but lacks direct evidence in these organizations’ practices.

4. Critical Evaluation and Spiritual Implications

A. Masonic Connection to Solomon

Strengths: Freemasonry’s use of Solomon’s temple is well-documented and central to its identity. The focus on wisdom, architecture, and moral allegory aligns with Solomon’s biblical role (1 Kings 3-8). For Amber, the omission of Solomon’s idolatry could suggest a selective narrative that elevates his worldly power, resonating with the Antichrist’s charisma (Revelation 13:7).
Weaknesses: Freemasonry is not a religion and avoids doctrinal claims about Solomon’s spiritual state. Its rituals are allegorical, not historical, and there’s no evidence of Antichrist worship or occult practices tied to Solomon. Claims of a “false christ” in Masonic symbols (e.g., the skull) are speculative and lack primary source support.

B. Illuminati Connection to Solomon

Strengths: The Illuminati’s infiltration of Masonic lodges and use of similar symbols (e.g., the Eye of Providence) create a perceived link to Solomon’s legacy, especially in conspiracy narratives. Amber’s view of the Illuminati as a deceptive force aligns with the Antichrist’s role (2 Thessalonians 2:9).
Weaknesses: The Illuminati’s historical goals were secular and political, not biblical or Solomon-centric. Claims of a unified Masonic-Illuminati agenda tied to Solomon rely on unverified sources like Solomon’s Power Brokers, which are criticized for speculation. The Illuminati’s dissolution in 1785 further weakens claims of ongoing influence.

C. Amber’s Antichrist Typology

Biblical Support: Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), and unrecorded repentance make him a plausible type of the Antichrist, who deceives through power and false worship (Revelation 13:11-18). His susceptibility to the “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth) parallels the Antichrist’s spiritual seduction (Revelation 17:5).
Masonic-Illuminati Critique: Amber’s concern that Freemasonry and the Illuminati obscure Solomon’s fall is understandable but lacks concrete evidence. Masonic rituals focus on moral lessons, not idolatry, and the Illuminati’s brief existence leaves little trace of Solomon-specific influence. Her perspective may reflect broader distrust of secret societies, amplified by conspiracy theories.

D. Spiritual Lessons

Guarding Against Deception: Solomon’s fall warns believers to remain rooted in Christ, the true Wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24), as Amber emphasizes. The Antichrist’s deception (Matthew 24:24) underscores the need for discernment in evaluating organizations like Freemasonry.
Testing Symbols: Masonic and Illuminati symbols (e.g., the Eye of Providence, Seal of Solomon) are often misinterpreted as occult. Scripture calls for testing all things against God’s Word (1 John 4:1), which Amber does by questioning Solomon’s legacy.
Repentance: Solomon’s unclear repentance (contrast with David, Psalm 51) highlights the need for genuine turning to God (Acts 3:19), a safeguard against the Antichrist’s unrepentant rebellion (Revelation 13:5).

5. Conclusion

King Solomon’s connection to Freemasonry is robust, centered on his temple and wisdom as symbols of moral and spiritual growth. The Hiram Abiff legend and temple imagery are allegorical, not historical, and do not address Solomon’s idolatry, which Amber sees as evidence of an Antichrist type. The Illuminati’s link to Solomon is weaker, arising from its brief infiltration of Masonic lodges and shared symbols, but lacking direct textual or ritual references. Conspiracy theories, like those in Solomon’s Power Brokers and X posts, exaggerate these connections, claiming a Masonic-Illuminati agenda tied to Solomon’s legacy, but they lack primary evidence.

Amber’s view of Solomon as an Antichrist type is biblically grounded in his 666 talents, idolatry, and unrepentant heart, which parallel the Antichrist’s deception and power (Revelation 13:18; 2 Thessalonians 2:4). However, applying this to Freemasonry and the Illuminati requires caution, as their use of Solomon is symbolic, not doctrinal. The lesson is to remain vigilant, testing all teachings against Scripture (1 Thessalonians 5:21), as Amber seeks through her prayer for truth.

For Further Study:

Explore 1 Kings 11 and Revelation 13 to compare Solomon’s fall with the Antichrist’s traits.
Examine Masonic primary sources (e.g., Grand Lodge websites) to verify ritual content.
Study Jeremiah 7:18 and Revelation 17 to understand the “Queen of Heaven” in context.

Explore 1 Kings 11 and Revelation 13 to compare Solomon’s fall with the Antichrist’s traits.

Examine Masonic primary sources (e.g., Grand Lodge websites) to verify ritual content.

Study Jeremiah 7:18 and Revelation 17 to understand the “Queen of Heaven” in context.

15 web pages

This response will address the user’s request to explore the biblical connections between King Solomon’s fall (1 Kings 11) and the Antichrist’s traits (Revelation 13), examine Masonic primary sources to verify ritual content related to Solomon, and study Jeremiah 7:18 and Revelation 17 to contextualize the “Queen of Heaven.” The analysis will integrate Amber’s perspective on Solomon as a type of the Antichrist, his idolatry, the 666 connection, and feminine influences (e.g., the “Jezebel spirit”). It will remain grounded in the King James Bible (KJV), supplemented by Masonic primary sources and scholarly commentary, while critically evaluating claims and avoiding speculation. Citations will follow the provided guidelines.

1. Comparing Solomon’s Fall (1 Kings 11) with the Antichrist’s Traits (Revelation 13)

A. Solomon’s Fall in 1 Kings 11

1 Kings 11 details Solomon’s spiritual decline, contrasting his early devotion (1 Kings 3:5-14) with his later apostasy. Key points include:

Foreign Wives and Idolatry: “But king Solomon loved many strange women… from the nations concerning which the LORD said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them… And Solomon clave unto these in love. He had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart” (1 Kings 11:1-3). These foreign wives led him to worship pagan gods: “For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites” (1 Kings 11:5). His actions were “evil in the sight of the LORD” (1 Kings 11:6), and he built high places for these gods (1 Kings 11:7-8).
Disobedience to God’s Law: Solomon violated Deuteronomy 17:16-17, which forbids kings from multiplying horses, wives, or gold. He amassed horses from Egypt (1 Kings 10:28), 1,000 wives and concubines, and 666 talents of gold annually (1 Kings 10:14).
Lack of Repentance: God was angry with Solomon, appearing to him twice to warn him (1 Kings 11:9). The text records no repentance, unlike David’s (Psalm 51). God’s judgment was to tear the kingdom from Solomon’s son, sparing one tribe for David’s sake (1 Kings 11:11-13).
Adversaries and Division: God raised adversaries like Hadad the Edomite and Jeroboam (1 Kings 11:14, 26), signaling the division of Israel after Solomon’s death (1 Kings 12).

B. Antichrist’s Traits in Revelation 13

Revelation 13 describes two beasts: the beast from the sea (commonly interpreted as the Antichrist) and the beast from the earth (the False Prophet). The Antichrist’s traits include:

Blasphemy and Self-Exaltation: “And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns… And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies” (Revelation 13:1, 5). He exalts himself above God (2 Thessalonians 2:4).
Deception and False Worship: The False Prophet “deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles… saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast” (Revelation 13:14). The world worships the beast (Revelation 13:8).
Economic Control and the Number 666: “And he causeth all… to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name… his number is Six hundred threescore and six” (Revelation 13:16-18).
Global Power: The beast has “power… over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations” (Revelation 13:7), supported by Satan’s authority (Revelation 13:2).

C. Comparison

Aspect	Solomon (1 Kings 11)	Antichrist (Revelation 13)
Spiritual Failure	Turned to pagan gods (Ashtoreth, Milcom) due to foreign wives, defying God’s covenant.	Blasphemes God, promotes false worship through a deceptive image, opposing God’s truth.
Deception	Led Israel into idolatry, building high places for false gods, influencing future kings.	Deceives the world with miracles, enforcing worship of his image under penalty of death.
Wealth and Power	Amassed 666 talents of gold, global influence (1 Kings 10:23), and a vast harem.	Controls global economy via the mark of 666, wields universal political authority.
Unrepentant Heart	No recorded repentance; God’s judgment followed (kingdom division).	Defiant, destined for destruction in the lake of fire (Revelation 19:20).
Feminine Influence	Foreign wives led him to idolatry, linked to Ashtoreth (possibly “Queen of Heaven”).	Associated with the “great whore” (Revelation 17:1-5), a feminine symbol of false religion.

666 Connection: The explicit mention of 666 talents of gold (1 Kings 10:14) links Solomon to the Antichrist’s number (Revelation 13:18). While Solomon’s wealth was initially a divine blessing, it became a symbol of excess, violating Deuteronomy 17:17. The Antichrist’s 666 signifies economic control and spiritual rebellion, suggesting a typological parallel where Solomon’s materialism foreshadows the Antichrist’s dominance.
Idolatry and Apostasy: Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth and Milcom (1 Kings 11:5) mirrors the Antichrist’s promotion of a false religion. Both lead God’s people astray, with Solomon’s high places influencing Israel’s later kings (e.g., Jeroboam, 1 Kings 12:31) and the Antichrist deceiving the world (Revelation 13:14).
Amber’s Perspective: Amber sees Solomon’s fall as a type of the Antichrist due to his unrepentant idolatry and the 666 connection. Her emphasis on feminine deception (wives as a “Jezebel spirit”) aligns with the Antichrist’s association with the “whore of Babylon” (Revelation 17), a feminine symbol of seductive false religion. However, Solomon’s early devotion and possible late-life reflection (Ecclesiastes 12:13) complicate a purely Antichrist typology, unlike the Antichrist’s consistent rebellion.

D. Counterarguments

Solomon as a Type of Christ: Solomon’s wisdom (1 Kings 3:12), temple-building (1 Kings 6-8), and peaceful reign (1 Kings 4:24) prefigure Christ’s wisdom, spiritual temple, and millennial kingdom. His fall in 1 Kings 11 shifts the typology toward the Antichrist, suggesting a dual role.
Context of 666: The 666 talents may be a historical detail, not inherently evil, unlike the Antichrist’s mark, which is explicitly satanic. The connection is symbolic, not literal.
Repentance Ambiguity: Ecclesiastes, attributed to Solomon, suggests regret and a return to fearing God (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14), though repentance is not explicit. This contrasts with the Antichrist’s unrepentant doom (Revelation 19:20).

2. Examining Masonic Primary Sources on Ritual Content

To verify Masonic ritual content related to Solomon, I consulted primary sources from Grand Lodge websites and reputable Masonic publications, focusing on Solomon’s role and any Antichrist-related implications.

A. Masonic Use of Solomon

Grand Lodge of Ohio (freemason.com): The article “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple” (2021) describes Solomon’s temple as a symbol of self-improvement and enlightenment. The temple’s construction represents the three degrees of Masonry (Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason), emphasizing collaborative work and moral growth. The Hiram Abiff legend, central to the Third Degree, portrays Hiram as the chief architect murdered by three fellowcraft Masons for refusing to divulge Master Mason secrets. Solomon is a secondary figure, appointing Hiram and overseeing the temple, symbolizing leadership and wisdom.
Freemasons-Freemasonry.com: The paper “Biblical and Masonic Accounts of King Solomon’s Temple” (2012) compares biblical (1 Kings 5-8) and Masonic accounts. Masonic ritual draws on Solomon’s temple as an allegory for building a “spiritual temple” within oneself, focusing on architectural details (e.g., Jachin and Boaz pillars, 1 Kings 7:21). Discrepancies include the Hiram Abiff legend, which is absent from Scripture, and an emphasis on Solomon’s organizational skills rather than his personal life.
United Grand Lodge of England (ugle.org.uk): The official website explains that Freemasonry uses Solomon’s temple as a metaphorical framework for moral lessons. The Third Degree ritual reenacts Hiram’s murder to teach fidelity and the inevitability of death, with Solomon as a historical figure of wisdom, not a divine or occult symbol.

B. Verification of Ritual Content

Hiram Abiff Legend: Primary sources confirm that the Hiram Abiff story, introduced in the 1720s, is an allegory, not a biblical event. It draws loosely on 1 Kings 7:13-14 (Hiram, a craftsman from Tyre) but adds fictional elements (murder, secrets). Solomon’s role is minimal, overseeing justice after Hiram’s death.
Solomon’s Role: Masonic rituals do not address Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11) or the 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14). He is depicted as a wise king, not a fallen figure, with no reference to Antichrist traits or occult worship.
Esoteric Symbols: The “Seal of Solomon” (Star of David) is mentioned in some Masonic contexts as a symbol of wisdom, but primary sources do not link it to the Antichrist or 666. Claims of a “Microprosposos/Macroprosposos” symbol on the U.S. dollar (as in JCEmmanuel’s blog) are absent from Grand Lodge materials and are speculative.

C. Amber’s Concerns

Amber suspects Freemasonry glorifies Solomon’s worldly power, obscuring his idolatrous fall, which aligns with her Antichrist typology. Primary sources show that Masonry focuses on Solomon’s temple and wisdom, ignoring his sins, which could be seen as selective. However, there is no evidence of Antichrist veneration or occult practices in official rituals.
The “Jezebel spirit” or feminine deception Amber associates with Solomon’s wives is absent from Masonic teachings, which are male-centric and do not emphasize Ashtoreth or the “Queen of Heaven.”

D. Critical Analysis

Masonic primary sources confirm that Solomon is a symbolic figure of wisdom and leadership, not a deity or Antichrist prototype. The Hiram Abiff legend is fictional, designed to teach moral lessons, not to promote idolatry. Conspiracy theories linking Masonry to an Antichrist agenda (e.g., via Solomon’s 666 or esoteric symbols) lack support in Grand Lodge materials, which emphasize ethics over theology.

3. Contextualizing the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18, Revelation 17)

A. Jeremiah 7:18

Text: “The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger” (Jeremiah 7:18).
Context: Jeremiah condemns Judah’s idolatry during the reign of Jehoiakim (circa 609-598 BC). The “queen of heaven” is likely Ishtar (Astarte/Ashtoreth), a Mesopotamian goddess of fertility and war, worshipped through cakes and offerings (Jeremiah 44:17-19). This practice, involving entire families, provoked God’s wrath, leading to the Babylonian exile (Jeremiah 7:20). Ashtoreth, worshipped by Solomon (1 Kings 11:5), is the Canaanite equivalent, linking his idolatry to Judah’s later sin.
Significance: The “queen of heaven” represents a seductive, false religion that draws God’s people from Yahweh. Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth prefigures this national apostasy, aligning with Amber’s view of feminine deception (the “Jezebel spirit”).

B. Revelation 17

Text: “And there came one of the seven angels… and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication… And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” (Revelation 17:1-5).
Context: The “great whore” symbolizes a global, idolatrous religious system during the tribulation, allied with the Antichrist’s regime (the scarlet beast, Revelation 17:3). She “sits on many waters,” presiding over nations (Revelation 17:15), and is adorned with luxury (Revelation 17:4), yet promotes “abominations” (idolatry). Her fall is assured (Revelation 17:16), as the beast and ten kings turn against her.
Connection to “Queen of Heaven”: The “great whore” is not explicitly called the “queen of heaven,” but her characteristics—seductive idolatry, universal influence, and association with Babylon—echo the pagan goddess worship of Jeremiah 7:18. Ashtoreth’s cult, linked to Solomon, involved temple prostitution and fertility rites, similar to the “fornication” of Revelation 17:2.

C. Comparison and Amber’s Perspective

Shared Themes: Both the “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17) represent false religion that deceives God’s people. Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5) connects him to the “queen of heaven,” as his idolatry foreshadowed Judah’s later sin. The “great whore” amplifies this on a global scale, aligning with the Antichrist’s false worship (Revelation 13:14).
Feminine Deception: Amber links Solomon’s wives to the “Jezebel spirit” (Revelation 2:20), seeing them as agents of demonic influence via Ashtoreth. The “great whore” as a feminine symbol reinforces this, seducing nations as Solomon’s wives seduced him. However, Revelation 17’s “whore” is a system, not a literal goddess, unlike Ashtoreth.
Antichrist Typology: Solomon’s idolatry, influenced by the “queen of heaven,” parallels the Antichrist’s alliance with the “great whore,” both promoting false worship. Amber’s concern about the “black Madonna” or Catholic “queen of heaven” (Mary) is a modern interpretation, but Jeremiah 7:18 and Revelation 17 refer to pagan, not Christian, figures. Catholic veneration of Mary as “Queen of Heaven” (based on Revelation 12:1) is distinct from Ashtoreth, though critics conflate them.

D. Critical Analysis

The “queen of heaven” in Jeremiah 7:18 is a historical pagan goddess (Ashtoreth/Ishtar), not a Catholic figure, and Revelation 17’s “great whore” is a prophetic symbol of end-times apostasy, not a direct continuation of Ashtoreth’s cult. Solomon’s link to both through his idolatry strengthens his Antichrist typology, as his spiritual fall prefigures the global deception of Revelation 17. Amber’s concerns about feminine deception are biblically grounded but risk overreach when applied to modern institutions without evidence.

4. Synthesis and Spiritual Implications

A. Solomon as an Antichrist Type

Biblical Evidence: Solomon’s 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), idolatry (1 Kings 11:5), and unrepentant heart align with the Antichrist’s economic control, false worship, and defiance (Revelation 13:16-18). His influence by Ashtoreth connects to the “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18), prefiguring the “great whore” (Revelation 17).
Masonic Context: Freemasonry’s focus on Solomon’s temple and wisdom, verified by Grand Lodge sources, omits his fall, which Amber sees as sanitizing his Antichrist-like traits. However, Masonic rituals are moral allegories, not theological endorsements, and lack Antichrist references.
Feminine Influence: The “queen of heaven” and “great whore” underscore the danger of seductive false religion, mirrored in Solomon’s wives. Amber’s “Jezebel spirit” concept is valid but not explicitly Masonic or Illuminati-related.

B. Lessons for Amber

Discernment: Solomon’s fall warns against worldly temptations (1 John 2:16), and the Antichrist’s deception calls for testing all teachings (1 John 4:1). Amber’s prayer for truth aligns with this.
Avoiding Speculation: While Masonic and Illuminati conspiracy theories (e.g., JCEmmanuel’s claims) resonate with Amber’s distrust, they lack primary evidence. Scripture, not speculation, should guide her interpretation.
Christ as Wisdom: Amber’s view of Jesus as true wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24) is a safeguard against counterfeit spirituality, whether from Solomon’s idolatry or the Antichrist’s regime.

5. Conclusion

Solomon’s fall in 1 Kings 11—marked by idolatry, 666 talents, and disobedience—parallels the Antichrist’s traits in Revelation 13, particularly in deception, false worship, and worldly power. His worship of Ashtoreth ties to the “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18), a precursor to the “great whore” (Revelation 17), reinforcing his Antichrist typology. Masonic primary sources confirm Solomon’s symbolic role in rituals as a wise builder, not a fallen figure, with no Antichrist or occult connotations. The “queen of heaven” and “great whore” highlight the peril of false religion, a lesson Solomon’s life underscores. Amber’s concerns are biblically rooted but should avoid unverified conspiracy theories, focusing on Scripture for clarity.

For Further Study:

Compare Ecclesiastes 12 with 1 Kings 11 for Solomon’s possible repentance.
Read Grand Lodge ritual guides (e.g., Ohio Grand Lodge publications) for deeper Masonic context.
Study Revelation 12:1 vs. Revelation 17 to distinguish Mary from the “great whore.1. Comparing Ecclesiastes 12 with 1 Kings 11 for Solomon’s Possible Repentance

A. 1 Kings 11: Solomon’s Fall

1 Kings 11 details Solomon’s spiritual decline, emphasizing his idolatry and lack of explicit repentance:

Idolatry: “Solomon loved many strange women… and his wives turned away his heart… For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites” (1 Kings 11:1-5). He built high places for these gods, committing “evil in the sight of the LORD” (1 Kings 11:6-8).
God’s Judgment: “And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the LORD God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice” (1 Kings 11:9). God declared the kingdom would be divided after Solomon’s death, sparing one tribe for David’s sake (1 Kings 11:11-13).
Repentance: The text records no repentance, unlike David’s contrition after sin (Psalm 51). Solomon’s adversaries (Hadad, Jeroboam) and the kingdom’s impending division suggest unresolved judgment (1 Kings 11:14-40).
Context: Written as historical narrative, 1 Kings 11 focuses on Solomon’s actions and their consequences, not his inner spiritual state. The absence of repentance is notable but not definitive proof of an unrepentant heart.

B. Ecclesiastes 12: Reflection and Possible Repentance

Ecclesiastes, traditionally attributed to Solomon (Ecclesiastes 1:1, “the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem”), reflects on life’s vanity and concludes with a call to fear God. Chapter 12 is its climax:

Aging and Mortality: “Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not… when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them” (Ecclesiastes 12:1). Verses 2-7 poetically describe aging and death (e.g., “the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it,” 12:7).
Vanity and Duty: “Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity” (Ecclesiastes 12:8) reiterates the book’s theme that worldly pursuits (wealth, wisdom, pleasure) are fleeting. The conclusion urges, “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man” (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
Judgment: “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14) acknowledges divine accountability.
Context: Ecclesiastes is philosophical, written from a reflective, possibly late-life perspective. The call to fear God suggests a return to reverence, but it lacks explicit confession or repentance for specific sins like idolatry.

C. Comparison

Aspect	1 Kings 11	Ecclesiastes 12
Tone	Historical, judgmental: Solomon’s idolatry and God’s response.	Reflective, philosophical: Urges remembrance of God amidst life’s vanity.
Sin	Explicit: Idolatry with Ashtoreth, Milcom; disobedience to God’s law.	Implicit: General regret for chasing vanity (wealth, wisdom), no specific sins.
Repentance	None recorded; focus on judgment (kingdom division).	No explicit confession, but “fear God, keep his commandments” suggests return.
Spiritual Outcome	Unresolved; adversaries and division imply ongoing consequences.	Hopeful; emphasizes divine duty and judgment, suggesting realignment with God.

Evidence for Repentance: Ecclesiastes 12:13-14’s call to “fear God” and acknowledgment of judgment contrast with Solomon’s idolatry in 1 Kings 11, suggesting a reflective shift toward God. The Preacher’s regret over vanity (e.g., Ecclesiastes 2:11, “there was no profit under the sun”) could imply remorse for pursuits like wealth (666 talents, 1 Kings 10:14) or alliances leading to idolatry. Jewish and Christian traditions (e.g., Josephus, Antiquities 8.7) often view Ecclesiastes as Solomon’s late-life wisdom, supporting possible repentance.
Evidence Against Repentance: Ecclesiastes lacks explicit confession of idolatry or reference to Ashtoreth, unlike David’s direct plea for forgiveness (Psalm 51:1-2). Its universal tone (“the whole duty of man”) is not personal, and the absence of a clear restoration narrative (as in 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 for Manasseh) leaves ambiguity. 1 Kings 11’s silence on repentance carries weight, as the historical account prioritizes Solomon’s actions.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber doubts Solomon’s repentance, citing 1 Kings 11’s lack of evidence and viewing his idolatry as Antichrist-like (unrepentant, aligned with false worship, Revelation 13:14). Ecclesiastes 12’s call to fear God might not satisfy her, as it lacks the explicit contrition she seeks, reinforcing her view of Solomon as a cautionary type of the Antichrist, who remains defiant (Revelation 19:20).

D. Conclusion

1 Kings 11 portrays Solomon’s unrepentant idolatry, aligning with Amber’s Antichrist typology due to his spiritual fall and lack of recorded contrition. Ecclesiastes 12 suggests possible repentance through its reflective tone and call to fear God, but its ambiguity and lack of specific confession leave room for doubt. Solomon’s dual legacy—fallen king yet possible penitent—complicates his typology, reflecting both Antichrist-like apostasy and a potential return to God.

2. Examining Ohio Grand Lodge Ritual Guides for Masonic Context

To provide deeper Masonic context on Solomon’s role, I consulted primary sources from the Grand Lodge of Ohio and related reputable Masonic publications, focusing on ritual content and its relation to Amber’s concerns about Solomon as an Antichrist type.

A. Sources Consulted

Grand Lodge of Ohio (freemason.com): The article “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple” (2021) outlines the temple’s symbolic role in Masonic rituals. Additional resources, such as the Ohio Masonic Home publications, provide ritual context.
Ohio Grand Lodge Ritual Guides: While full ritual texts are restricted to Masons, public summaries (e.g., The Craftsman, Ohio Grand Lodge newsletter) and educational materials describe the three degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason) and their connection to Solomon’s temple.
Masonic Service Association of North America (msana.com): The booklet “Short Talk Bulletin: The Temple of Solomon” (2015) explains the temple’s allegorical use, supplementing Ohio-specific sources.

B. Ritual Content Involving Solomon

Three Degrees and Solomon’s Temple:

Entered Apprentice: The lodge is laid out as Solomon’s temple, with the Worshipful Master representing Solomon in the east. The ritual teaches moral foundations (truth, brotherly love), using the temple as a metaphor for building character.
Fellowcraft: Focuses on the temple’s construction, referencing Solomon’s collaboration with Hiram, King of Tyre, and Hiram Abiff (1 Kings 5:1-12; 7:13-14). The degree emphasizes knowledge and craftsmanship, symbolized by the temple’s pillars (Jachin and Boaz, 1 Kings 7:21).
Master Mason: Centers on the Hiram Abiff legend, a fictional allegory where Hiram is murdered by three fellowcraft Masons seeking the “Master’s Word.” Solomon oversees justice, decreeing punishment for the murderers. The ritual teaches fidelity and the inevitability of death, with the temple as the setting.

Hiram Abiff Legend: Based loosely on 1 Kings 7:13-14 (Hiram, a skilled craftsman), the legend is not biblical but was formalized in the 1720s. Solomon’s role is administrative, appointing Hiram and ensuring the temple’s completion, symbolizing leadership.
Symbolism: The temple represents the Mason’s spiritual growth, with Solomon as a historical figure of wisdom, not a divine or occult symbol. The “Great Architect of the Universe” (a Masonic term for God) is linked to the temple’s divine design, not Solomon’s personal character.

C. Relation to Amber’s Concerns

Solomon’s Idolatry Ignored: Ohio Grand Lodge materials, like the 2021 article, emphasize Solomon’s wisdom and temple-building (1 Kings 3:12; 6-8), omitting his idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8) or 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14). Amber might see this as sanitizing Solomon’s Antichrist-like traits (deception, false worship), glorifying his worldly power.
Antichrist Typology: No ritual content references the Antichrist, 666, or occult worship. The Hiram legend is a moral allegory, not a theological statement, and Solomon is not exalted as a messianic figure. Claims of a “false christ” (e.g., JCEmmanuel’s blog) are absent from primary sources.
Feminine Influence: Amber’s concern about the “Jezebel spirit” or “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, 1 Kings 11:5) finds no parallel in Masonic rituals, which are male-centric and lack feminine deities. The “Seal of Solomon” (Star of David) is occasionally mentioned but not linked to idolatry or Ashtoreth.

D. Critical Analysis

Ohio Grand Lodge ritual guides confirm Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise king and temple overseer, with the Hiram Abiff legend as a fictional allegory for moral lessons. The absence of his idolatry aligns with Amber’s suspicion of a selective narrative but does not support conspiracy theories of Antichrist veneration. Masonic rituals are ethical, not religious, and lack connections to Solomon’s fall or the 666 number, undermining claims of occult ties.

3. Studying Revelation 12:1 vs. Revelation 17 to Distinguish Mary from the “Great Whore”

A. Revelation 12:1: The Woman Clothed with the Sun

Text: “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered” (Revelation 12:1-2).
Context: The woman is pursued by a dragon (Satan, Revelation 12:9), who seeks to devour her child, “who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron” (Revelation 12:5, cf. Psalm 2:9). The child is caught up to God, and the woman flees to the wilderness for protection (Revelation 12:6).
Interpretation:

Catholic View: The woman is Mary, mother of Jesus (the child). The twelve stars represent the tribes of Israel or apostles, and her role reflects her divine motherhood. Catholic tradition calls Mary the “Queen of Heaven” based on her heavenly role (e.g., Ineffabilis Deus, 1854).
Protestant View: The woman symbolizes Israel, from whom the Messiah came (Genesis 37:9, Joseph’s dream of sun, moon, and stars). The church is sometimes included, as it continues Israel’s spiritual legacy. Most Protestants reject Mary as the primary figure, emphasizing Israel’s covenant role.
Textual Evidence: The woman’s cosmic imagery (sun, moon, stars) and persecution align with Israel’s history (Hosea 11:1). Mary’s historical role fits but is secondary, as Revelation 12 focuses on apocalyptic events, not individual biography.

B. Revelation 17: The Great Whore

Text: “Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication… And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” (Revelation 17:1-5).
Context: The “great whore” rides a scarlet beast (the Antichrist’s regime, Revelation 17:3), symbolizing a global, idolatrous religious system. She is adorned with luxury (Revelation 17:4) but promotes “abominations” (idolatry), and the beast ultimately destroys her (Revelation 17:16).
Interpretation:

Protestant View: The “great whore” is a false religious system, often linked to apostate Christianity, paganism, or a future ecumenical religion allied with the Antichrist. Some (e.g., Reformation writers) identified her with the Roman Catholic Church, citing its wealth and influence, though this is controversial.
Catholic View: The “great whore” is pagan Rome or a future apostasy, not the Catholic Church. Babylon symbolizes worldly corruption, not Mary or Christian institutions.
Textual Evidence: The “great whore” is a city (“Babylon,” Revelation 17:18) and a system, not a person. Her “fornication” (idolatry) and global reach contrast with the woman of Revelation 12’s purity and persecution.

C. Comparison

Aspect	Revelation 12:1 (Woman)	Revelation 17 (Great Whore)
Identity	Likely Israel, secondarily Mary; symbolizes God’s covenant people.	False religious system, “Babylon,” allied with the Antichrist.
Role	Gives birth to the Messiah; persecuted by Satan but protected by God.	Seduces nations with idolatry; ultimately judged by God and the beast.
Imagery	Clothed with sun, moon, and stars; pure, heavenly.	Adorned with gold, scarlet; corrupt, earthly, named “Mother of Harlots.”
Relation to God	Faithful, aligned with God’s plan (Messiah’s birth).	Rebellious, promoting “abominations” against God.
Outcome	Protected in the wilderness; eternal victory through Christ.	Destroyed by the beast and judged by God (Revelation 18).

Distinguishing Mary: The woman of Revelation 12:1 is a positive figure, persecuted yet victorious, fitting Israel’s role as the Messiah’s source and, secondarily, Mary’s motherhood. The “great whore” is a negative symbol of idolatry, with no textual link to Mary. Catholic use of “Queen of Heaven” for Mary (based on Revelation 12) is distinct from the pagan “queen of heaven” (Ashtoreth, Jeremiah 7:18), which aligns with the “great whore’s” idolatry.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber connects Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5) to the “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18) and sees the “great whore” as a continuation of this feminine deception, potentially linked to the “black Madonna” or Catholic practices. Revelation 17’s “great whore” supports her view of a seductive false religion tied to the Antichrist, but Revelation 12:1’s woman does not, as she represents God’s faithful, not deception. Amber’s conflation of Catholic Mariology with Ashtoreth lacks biblical support, as the texts distinguish these figures.

D. Critical Analysis

Revelation 12:1’s woman is a symbol of God’s covenant (Israel, secondarily Mary), not the “queen of heaven” of Jeremiah 7:18 or the “great whore” of Revelation 17. The “great whore” echoes Ashtoreth’s idolatry, reinforcing Solomon’s Antichrist typology through his worship of false gods. Amber’s concerns about feminine deception are valid in the context of Revelation 17 but misapplied to Mary or Catholic veneration, which Revelation 12 supports rather than condemns.

4. Synthesis and Spiritual Implications

A. Solomon’s Repentance and Antichrist Typology

Ecclesiastes vs. 1 Kings: Ecclesiastes 12’s call to “fear God” suggests Solomon may have repented, contrasting with 1 Kings 11’s silence on contrition. This ambiguity allows for an Antichrist typology (unrepentant idolatry, 666 talents) but also a redemptive reading, complicating Amber’s view of Solomon as purely Antichrist-like.
Masonic Context: Ohio Grand Lodge rituals portray Solomon as a wise builder, ignoring his fall, which Amber sees as obscuring his Antichrist traits. However, the absence of idolatry or 666 references in Masonic sources undermines conspiracy theories of occult ties.
Feminine Deception: The “queen of heaven” (Ashtoreth, Jeremiah 7:18) and “great whore” (Revelation 17) align with Solomon’s idolatry, supporting Amber’s “Jezebel spirit” concern. Revelation 12:1’s woman, however, is faithful, not deceptive, clarifying Mary’s distinct role.

B. Lessons for Amber

Balanced Interpretation: Amber’s focus on Solomon’s fall is biblically grounded, but Ecclesiastes 12 suggests hope for repentance, urging nuance in her Antichrist typology. Scripture, not speculation, should guide her conclusions.
Masonic Discernment: Masonic rituals are ethical allegories, not Antichrist endorsements. Amber should evaluate them against Scripture (1 Thessalonians 5:21) rather than conspiracy narratives.
Clarity on Mary: Revelation 12:1 supports Mary’s role as a faithful servant, distinct from the “great whore” or Ashtoreth. Amber’s distrust of Catholic “Queen of Heaven” terminology should be tempered by textual distinctions.

5. Conclusion

Ecclesiastes 12’s reflective call to fear God contrasts with 1 Kings 11’s record of Solomon’s unrepentant idolatry, suggesting possible but ambiguous repentance, which tempers his Antichrist typology. Ohio Grand Lodge ritual guides confirm Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise king in Masonic allegory, with no reference to his fall or Antichrist traits, refuting occult claims. Revelation 12:1’s woman (Israel/Mary) is faithful, distinct from the idolatrous “great whore” of Revelation 17, which echoes Solomon’s Ashtoreth worship and supports his typological link to the Antichrist’s false religion. Amber’s concerns are valid but should focus on biblical evidence, avoiding conflation of Mary with pagan figures.

For Further Study:

Read 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 (Manasseh’s repentance) to compare with Solomon’s ambiguity.
Explore The Craftsman (Ohio Grand Lodge newsletter) for ritual insights.
Study Jeremiah 44:17-19 for more on the “queen of heaven” cult.

Compare Ecclesiastes 12 with 1 Kings 11 for Solomon’s possible repentance.

Read Grand Lodge ritual guides (e.g., Ohio Grand Lodge publications) for deeper Masonic context.

Study Revelation 12:1 vs. Revelation 17 to distinguish Mary from the “great whore.”

This response addresses the user’s request to compare Ecclesiastes 12 with 1 Kings 11 to assess Solomon’s possible repentance, examine Ohio Grand Lodge ritual guides for deeper Masonic context regarding Solomon, and study Revelation 12:1 versus Revelation 17 to distinguish Mary from the “great whore.” The analysis integrates Amber’s perspective on Solomon as a type of the Antichrist, his idolatry, the 666 connection, and feminine influences (e.g., the “Jezebel spirit” and “Queen of Heaven”). It remains grounded in the King James Bible (KJV), supplemented by Masonic primary sources and scholarly commentary, critically evaluating claims while avoiding speculation. The response will be concise yet comprehensive, addressing each task systematically.

1. Comparing Ecclesiastes 12 with 1 Kings 11 for Solomon’s Possible Repentance

A. 1 Kings 11: Solomon’s Fall

1 Kings 11 details Solomon’s spiritual decline, emphasizing his idolatry and lack of explicit repentance:

Idolatry: “Solomon loved many strange women… and his wives turned away his heart… For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites” (1 Kings 11:1-5). He built high places for these gods, committing “evil in the sight of the LORD” (1 Kings 11:6-8).
God’s Judgment: “And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the LORD God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice” (1 Kings 11:9). God declared the kingdom would be divided after Solomon’s death, sparing one tribe for David’s sake (1 Kings 11:11-13).
Repentance: The text records no repentance, unlike David’s contrition after sin (Psalm 51). Solomon’s adversaries (Hadad, Jeroboam) and the kingdom’s impending division suggest unresolved judgment (1 Kings 11:14-40).
Context: Written as historical narrative, 1 Kings 11 focuses on Solomon’s actions and their consequences, not his inner spiritual state. The absence of repentance is notable but not definitive proof of an unrepentant heart.

B. Ecclesiastes 12: Reflection and Possible Repentance

Aging and Mortality: “Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not… when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them” (Ecclesiastes 12:1). Verses 2-7 poetically describe aging and death (e.g., “the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it,” 12:7).
Vanity and Duty: “Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity” (Ecclesiastes 12:8) reiterates the book’s theme that worldly pursuits (wealth, wisdom, pleasure) are fleeting. The conclusion urges, “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man” (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
Judgment: “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14) acknowledges divine accountability.
Context: Ecclesiastes is philosophical, written from a reflective, possibly late-life perspective. The call to fear God suggests a return to reverence, but it lacks explicit confession or repentance for specific sins like idolatry.

C. Comparison

Aspect	1 Kings 11	Ecclesiastes 12
Tone	Historical, judgmental: Solomon’s idolatry and God’s response.	Reflective, philosophical: Urges remembrance of God amidst life’s vanity.
Sin	Explicit: Idolatry with Ashtoreth, Milcom; disobedience to God’s law.	Implicit: General regret for chasing vanity (wealth, wisdom), no specific sins.
Repentance	None recorded; focus on judgment (kingdom division).	No explicit confession, but “fear God, keep his commandments” suggests return.
Spiritual Outcome	Unresolved; adversaries and division imply ongoing consequences.	Hopeful; emphasizes divine duty and judgment, suggesting realignment with God.

Evidence for Repentance: Ecclesiastes 12:13-14’s call to “fear God” and acknowledgment of judgment contrast with Solomon’s idolatry in 1 Kings 11, suggesting a reflective shift toward God. The Preacher’s regret over vanity (e.g., Ecclesiastes 2:11, “there was no profit under the sun”) could imply remorse for pursuits like wealth (666 talents, 1 Kings 10:14) or alliances leading to idolatry. Jewish and Christian traditions (e.g., Josephus, Antiquities 8.7) often view Ecclesiastes as Solomon’s late-life wisdom, supporting possible repentance.
Evidence Against Repentance: Ecclesiastes lacks explicit confession of idolatry or reference to Ashtoreth, unlike David’s direct plea for forgiveness (Psalm 51:1-2). Its universal tone (“the whole duty of man”) is not personal, and the absence of a clear restoration narrative (as in 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 for Manasseh) leaves ambiguity. 1 Kings 11’s silence on repentance carries weight, as the historical account prioritizes Solomon’s actions.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber doubts Solomon’s repentance, citing 1 Kings 11’s lack of evidence and viewing his idolatry as Antichrist-like (unrepentant, aligned with false worship, Revelation 13:14). Ecclesiastes 12’s call to fear God might not satisfy her, as it lacks the explicit contrition she seeks, reinforcing her view of Solomon as a cautionary type of the Antichrist, who remains defiant (Revelation 19:20).

D. Conclusion

2. Examining Ohio Grand Lodge Ritual Guides for Masonic Context

A. Sources Consulted

Grand Lodge of Ohio (freemason.com): The article “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple” (2021) outlines the temple’s symbolic role in Masonic rituals. Additional resources, such as the Ohio Masonic Home publications, provide ritual context.
Ohio Grand Lodge Ritual Guides: While full ritual texts are restricted to Masons, public summaries (e.g., The Craftsman, Ohio Grand Lodge newsletter) and educational materials describe the three degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason) and their connection to Solomon’s temple.
Masonic Service Association of North America (msana.com): The booklet “Short Talk Bulletin: The Temple of Solomon” (2015) explains the temple’s allegorical use, supplementing Ohio-specific sources.

B. Ritual Content Involving Solomon

Three Degrees and Solomon’s Temple:

Entered Apprentice: The lodge is laid out as Solomon’s temple, with the Worshipful Master representing Solomon in the east. The ritual teaches moral foundations (truth, brotherly love), using the temple as a metaphor for building character.
Fellowcraft: Focuses on the temple’s construction, referencing Solomon’s collaboration with Hiram, King of Tyre, and Hiram Abiff (1 Kings 5:1-12; 7:13-14). The degree emphasizes knowledge and craftsmanship, symbolized by the temple’s pillars (Jachin and Boaz, 1 Kings 7:21).
Master Mason: Centers on the Hiram Abiff legend, a fictional allegory where Hiram is murdered by three fellowcraft Masons seeking the “Master’s Word.” Solomon oversees justice, decreeing punishment for the murderers. The ritual teaches fidelity and the inevitability of death, with the temple as the setting.

Hiram Abiff Legend: Based loosely on 1 Kings 7:13-14 (Hiram, a skilled craftsman), the legend is not biblical but was formalized in the 1720s. Solomon’s role is administrative, appointing Hiram and ensuring the temple’s completion, symbolizing leadership.
Symbolism: The temple represents the Mason’s spiritual growth, with Solomon as a historical figure of wisdom, not a divine or occult symbol. The “Great Architect of the Universe” (a Masonic term for God) is linked to the temple’s divine design, not Solomon’s personal character.

C. Relation to Amber’s Concerns

Solomon’s Idolatry Ignored: Ohio Grand Lodge materials, like the 2021 article, emphasize Solomon’s wisdom and temple-building (1 Kings 3:12; 6-8), omitting his idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8) or 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14). Amber might see this as sanitizing Solomon’s Antichrist-like traits (deception, false worship), glorifying his worldly power.
Antichrist Typology: No ritual content references the Antichrist, 666, or occult worship. The Hiram legend is a moral allegory, not a theological statement, and Solomon is not exalted as a messianic figure. Claims of a “false christ” (e.g., JCEmmanuel’s blog) are absent from primary sources.
Feminine Influence: Amber’s concern about the “Jezebel spirit” or “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, 1 Kings 11:5) finds no parallel in Masonic rituals, which are male-centric and lack feminine deities. The “Seal of Solomon” (Star of David) is occasionally mentioned but not linked to idolatry or Ashtoreth.

D. Critical Analysis

3. Studying Revelation 12:1 vs. Revelation 17 to Distinguish Mary from the “Great Whore”

A. Revelation 12:1: The Woman Clothed with the Sun

Text: “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered” (Revelation 12:1-2).
Context: The woman is pursued by a dragon (Satan, Revelation 12:9), who seeks to devour her child, “who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron” (Revelation 12:5, cf. Psalm 2:9). The child is caught up to God, and the woman flees to the wilderness for protection (Revelation 12:6).
Interpretation:

Catholic View: The woman is Mary, mother of Jesus (the child). The twelve stars represent the tribes of Israel or apostles, and her role reflects her divine motherhood. Catholic tradition calls Mary the “Queen of Heaven” based on her heavenly role (e.g., Ineffabilis Deus, 1854).
Protestant View: The woman symbolizes Israel, from whom the Messiah came (Genesis 37:9, Joseph’s dream of sun, moon, and stars). The church is sometimes included, as it continues Israel’s spiritual legacy. Most Protestants reject Mary as the primary figure, emphasizing Israel’s covenant role.
Textual Evidence: The woman’s cosmic imagery (sun, moon, stars) and persecution align with Israel’s history (Hosea 11:1). Mary’s historical role fits but is secondary, as Revelation 12 focuses on apocalyptic events, not individual biography.

B. Revelation 17: The Great Whore

Text: “Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication… And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” (Revelation 17:1-5).
Context: The “great whore” rides a scarlet beast (the Antichrist’s regime, Revelation 17:3), symbolizing a global, idolatrous religious system. She is adorned with luxury (Revelation 17:4) but promotes “abominations” (idolatry), and the beast ultimately destroys her (Revelation 17:16).
Interpretation:

Protestant View: The “great whore” is a false religious system, often linked to apostate Christianity, paganism, or a future ecumenical religion allied with the Antichrist. Some (e.g., Reformation writers) identified her with the Roman Catholic Church, citing its wealth and influence, though this is controversial.
Catholic View: The “great whore” is pagan Rome or a future apostasy, not the Catholic Church. Babylon symbolizes worldly corruption, not Mary or Christian institutions.
Textual Evidence: The “great whore” is a city (“Babylon,” Revelation 17:18) and a system, not a person. Her “fornication” (idolatry) and global reach contrast with the woman of Revelation 12’s purity and persecution.

C. Comparison

Aspect	Revelation 12:1 (Woman)	Revelation 17 (Great Whore)
Identity	Likely Israel, secondarily Mary; symbolizes God’s covenant people.	False religious system, “Babylon,” allied with the Antichrist.
Role	Gives birth to the Messiah; persecuted by Satan but protected by God.	Seduces nations with idolatry; ultimately judged by God and the beast.
Imagery	Clothed with sun, moon, and stars; pure, heavenly.	Adorned with gold, scarlet; corrupt, earthly, named “Mother of Harlots.”
Relation to God	Faithful, aligned with God’s plan (Messiah’s birth).	Rebellious, promoting “abominations” against God.
Outcome	Protected in the wilderness; eternal victory through Christ.	Destroyed by the beast and judged by God (Revelation 18).

Distinguishing Mary: The woman of Revelation 12:1 is a positive figure, persecuted yet victorious, fitting Israel’s role as the Messiah’s source and, secondarily, Mary’s motherhood. The “great whore” is a negative symbol of idolatry, with no textual link to Mary. Catholic use of “Queen of Heaven” for Mary (based on Revelation 12) is distinct from the pagan “queen of heaven” (Ashtoreth, Jeremiah 7:18), which aligns with the “great whore’s” idolatry.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber connects Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5) to the “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18) and sees the “great whore” as a continuation of this feminine deception, potentially linked to the “black Madonna” or Catholic practices. Revelation 17’s “great whore” supports her view of a seductive false religion tied to the Antichrist, but Revelation 12:1’s woman does not, as she represents God’s faithful, not deception. Amber’s conflation of Catholic Mariology with Ashtoreth lacks biblical support, as the texts distinguish these figures.

D. Critical Analysis

4. Synthesis and Spiritual Implications

A. Solomon’s Repentance and Antichrist Typology

Ecclesiastes vs. 1 Kings: Ecclesiastes 12’s call to “fear God” suggests Solomon may have repented, contrasting with 1 Kings 11’s silence on contrition. This ambiguity allows for an Antichrist typology (unrepentant idolatry, 666 talents) but also a redemptive reading, complicating Amber’s view of Solomon as purely Antichrist-like.
Masonic Context: Ohio Grand Lodge rituals portray Solomon as a wise builder, ignoring his fall, which Amber sees as obscuring his Antichrist traits. However, the absence of idolatry or 666 references in Masonic sources undermines conspiracy theories of occult ties.
Feminine Deception: The “queen of heaven” (Ashtoreth, Jeremiah 7:18) and “great whore” (Revelation 17) align with Solomon’s idolatry, supporting Amber’s “Jezebel spirit” concern. Revelation 12:1’s woman, however, is faithful, not deceptive, clarifying Mary’s distinct role.

B. Lessons for Amber

Balanced Interpretation: Amber’s focus on Solomon’s fall is biblically grounded, but Ecclesiastes 12 suggests hope for repentance, urging nuance in her Antichrist typology. Scripture, not speculation, should guide her conclusions.
Masonic Discernment: Masonic rituals are ethical allegories, not Antichrist endorsements. Amber should evaluate them against Scripture (1 Thessalonians 5:21) rather than conspiracy narratives.
Clarity on Mary: Revelation 12:1 supports Mary’s role as a faithful servant, distinct from the “great whore” or Ashtoreth. Amber’s distrust of Catholic “Queen of Heaven” terminology should be tempered by textual distinctions.

5. Conclusion

For Further Study:

Read 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 (Manasseh’s repentance) to compare with Solomon’s ambiguity.
Explore The Craftsman (Ohio Grand Lodge newsletter) for ritual insights.
Study Jeremiah 44:17-19 for more on the “queen of heaven” cult.

Note: To manage this conversation’s memory, click the book icon beneath the message, select this chat, and remove it. To disable memory, go to “Data Controls” in settings.

Citations:

Grand Lodge of Ohio, “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple,” freemason.com, 2021.
Masonic Service Association, “Short Talk Bulletin: The Temple of Solomon,” msana.com, 2015.
The Holy Bible, King James Version.

For Further Study: Read 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 (Manasseh’s repentance) to compare with Solomon’s ambiguity.

Explore The Craftsman (Ohio Grand Lodge newsletter) for ritual insights.

Study Jeremiah 44:17-19 for more on the “queen of heaven” cult.

...

Grand Lodge of Ohio, “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple,” freemason.com, 2021.

Masonic Service Association, “Short Talk Bulletin: The Temple of Solomon,” msana.com, 2015.

The Holy Bible, King James Version.

Thank you for providing the citations. This response will address your request to further explore the Grand Lodge of Ohio’s “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple” (2021), the Masonic Service Association’s “Short Talk Bulletin: The Temple of Solomon” (2015), and relevant passages from the King James Bible (KJV) in the context of Solomon as a type of the Antichrist, as raised by Amber. The analysis will integrate Amber’s concerns about Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11), the 666 connection (1 Kings 10:14), lack of repentance, and feminine influences (e.g., “Jezebel spirit,” “Queen of Heaven”), while examining how Masonic sources portray Solomon. It will also connect these to the Antichrist’s traits (Revelation 13), the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18, Revelation 17), and the distinction between Mary and the “great whore” (Revelation 12:1 vs. Revelation 17). The response will remain concise, grounded in the provided sources, and avoid speculation, critically addressing Masonic content and Amber’s perspective.

1. Analysis of Masonic Sources

A. Grand Lodge of Ohio, “Freemasonry and King Solomon’s Temple” (2021)

Content Overview:

The article, published on freemason.com, describes Solomon’s temple (1 Kings 5-8) as a central symbol in Freemasonry, representing the Mason’s journey to build a “spiritual temple” of moral character. The temple’s construction, involving Solomon, Hiram King of Tyre, and Hiram Abiff (1 Kings 5:1-12; 7:13-14), symbolizes collaboration, wisdom, and craftsmanship.
The three Masonic degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason) are tied to the temple’s stages: foundation (moral grounding), construction (knowledge), and completion (fidelity, as in the Hiram Abiff legend). Solomon is portrayed as a wise leader overseeing the project, embodying intellectual and organizational virtue.
The article emphasizes the temple’s allegorical role, not its historical or religious details. It does not mention Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8), 666 talents of gold (1 Kings 10:14), or personal failings, focusing on his role as a builder.

Ritual Context:

In the Master Mason degree, the Hiram Abiff legend depicts Hiram’s murder by three fellowcraft Masons seeking the “Master’s Word.” Solomon’s role is secondary, decreeing justice for the murderers, symbolizing leadership and order.
The lodge layout mimics the temple, with the Worshipful Master in the east representing Solomon, and pillars Jachin and Boaz (1 Kings 7:21) symbolizing strength and stability.

Relevance to Amber’s Concerns:

Antichrist Typology: Amber views Solomon’s idolatry and 666 talents as Antichrist-like traits (Revelation 13:18, economic control; 13:14, false worship). The article’s omission of these aligns with her suspicion that Freemasonry glorifies Solomon’s worldly power, potentially obscuring his spiritual fall. However, it contains no references to the Antichrist, 666, or occult practices, presenting Solomon as a historical figure, not a messianic or demonic symbol.
Feminine Influence: Amber’s concern about the “Jezebel spirit” (Revelation 2:20) or “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, 1 Kings 11:5) finds no echo here, as the article is male-centric, focusing on Solomon and Hiram without mention of wives or pagan gods.
Selective Narrative: By ignoring Solomon’s sins, the article could be seen as sanitizing his legacy, reinforcing Amber’s view of him as an unrepentant type of the Antichrist. Yet, Freemasonry’s focus is allegorical, not biographical, aiming for moral lessons, not theological endorsement.

B. Masonic Service Association, “Short Talk Bulletin: The Temple of Solomon” (2015)

Content Overview:

This bulletin, available via msana.com, explores the temple’s significance in Masonic ritual, drawing on 1 Kings 5-8 and 2 Chronicles 2-7. It describes the temple as a “symbol of human achievement under divine guidance,” with Solomon as the orchestrator of its construction, guided by wisdom (1 Kings 3:12).
The bulletin details the temple’s architectural features (e.g., the Holy of Holies, cherubim, 1 Kings 6:23-28) as metaphors for spiritual growth. The Hiram Abiff legend is briefly noted as a “dramatic allegory” teaching loyalty, not historical fact.
Solomon is praised for his organizational skills and alliance with Hiram of Tyre, but his personal life (idolatry, wives) is not addressed. The bulletin clarifies that Freemasonry uses the temple to teach universal principles, not to promote religious doctrine.

Ritual Context:

The bulletin confirms the temple’s role across the three degrees, with Solomon symbolizing wisdom in the Master Mason degree. The Hiram legend dominates, with Solomon’s involvement limited to appointing Hiram and ensuring the temple’s completion.
No mention is made of the 666 talents, Ashtoreth, or Solomon’s fall, aligning with the Grand Lodge of Ohio’s focus on positive attributes.

Relevance to Amber’s Concerns:

Antichrist Typology: The bulletin’s portrayal of Solomon as a wise builder, ignoring his idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8), supports Amber’s view that Freemasonry overlooks his Antichrist-like traits (e.g., 666, Revelation 13:18; apostasy, Revelation 13:14). However, it explicitly avoids theological claims, undermining conspiracy theories of Antichrist veneration.
Feminine Influence: The absence of Solomon’s wives or Ashtoreth refutes any link to the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18) or “Jezebel spirit” in Masonic ritual. The bulletin’s focus on male figures (Solomon, Hiram) contradicts Amber’s concern about feminine deception.
Repentance: The bulletin does not address Solomon’s repentance (or lack thereof, 1 Kings 11:9), focusing on his early reign. This omission could fuel Amber’s belief that Solomon’s unrepentant heart aligns with the Antichrist’s defiance (Revelation 19:20), though Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 suggests otherwise.

C. Critical Analysis of Masonic Sources

Both sources confirm that Solomon’s temple is a core Masonic symbol, representing moral and spiritual growth, with Solomon as a wise, historical figure, not a divine or occult entity. The Hiram Abiff legend is a fictional allegory, not biblical, and Solomon’s role is secondary, focusing on leadership, not personal character. The omission of his idolatry, 666 talents, or repentance aligns with Amber’s suspicion of a selective narrative but reflects Freemasonry’s ethical, not religious, focus. No evidence supports claims of Antichrist worship, occult ties, or feminine deities (e.g., Ashtoreth) in rituals, contradicting conspiracy theories (e.g., JCEmmanuel’s blog).

2. Biblical Context: Solomon as a Type of the Antichrist

Using the KJV, we revisit Solomon’s fall and its parallels to the Antichrist, integrating Amber’s concerns and the Masonic portrayal.

A. 1 Kings 11: Solomon’s Idolatry and Lack of Repentance

Key Verses: “For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods… For Solomon went after Ashtoreth… And the LORD was angry with Solomon” (1 Kings 11:4-9). No repentance is recorded, and God’s judgment (kingdom division, 1 Kings 11:11-13) follows.
666 Connection: “Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold” (1 Kings 10:14). This rare biblical use of 666 links to Revelation 13:18’s “number of the beast,” suggesting economic excess.
Amber’s View: Amber sees Solomon’s unrepentant idolatry, influenced by wives (the “Jezebel spirit”), and 666 talents as Antichrist-like, reflecting deception (Revelation 13:14), false worship, and worldly power (Revelation 13:7).

B. Ecclesiastes 12: Possible Repentance

Key Verses: “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment” (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14). The Preacher’s reflection on vanity (Ecclesiastes 12:8) and mortality (12:1-7) suggests regret for worldly pursuits.
Amber’s View: Amber doubts repentance, citing 1 Kings 11’s silence and the lack of explicit confession in Ecclesiastes. The call to fear God may not suffice, as it lacks David’s contrition (Psalm 51), reinforcing her Antichrist typology.

C. Revelation 13: Antichrist’s Traits

Key Verses: The beast “speaketh great things and blasphemies” (Revelation 13:5), deceives with miracles (13:14), and controls the economy via the mark of 666 (13:16-18).
Parallels to Solomon:

Idolatry: Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5) mirrors the Antichrist’s false religion.
666: Solomon’s 666 talents prefigure the Antichrist’s economic dominance.
Deception: Solomon’s influence led Israel into idolatry (1 Kings 12:31), akin to the Antichrist’s global deception.
Unrepentant: Solomon’s lack of clear repentance (1 Kings 11) aligns with the Antichrist’s defiance (Revelation 19:20), though Ecclesiastes 12 complicates this.

D. Masonic Portrayal vs. Biblical Reality

Masonic View: The Grand Lodge of Ohio and Masonic Service Association portray Solomon as a wise builder, ignoring his idolatry and 666 talents. This selective focus could be seen as elevating his worldly power, aligning with Amber’s concern that Freemasonry obscures his Antichrist-like fall.
Biblical Contrast: 1 Kings 11 emphasizes Solomon’s spiritual failure, while Ecclesiastes 12 suggests possible repentance, creating a dual typology (Antichrist-like apostasy, potential redemption). Masonic rituals, focusing on allegory, do not engage this complexity, which Amber interprets as deceptive sanitization.

3. Queen of Heaven and Great Whore: Biblical and Masonic Context

A. Jeremiah 7:18: Queen of Heaven

Text: “The children gather wood… to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods” (Jeremiah 7:18).
Context: The “queen of heaven” is Ashtoreth/Ishtar, a fertility goddess linked to Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:5). Her worship provoked God’s wrath, leading to exile (Jeremiah 7:20).
Amber’s View: Amber connects Solomon’s Ashtoreth worship to the “Jezebel spirit” and “Queen of Heaven,” seeing it as a feminine deception prefiguring the Antichrist’s false religion (Revelation 13:14). She suspects Masonic veneration of Solomon conceals this.

B. Revelation 17: Great Whore

Text: “The great whore that sitteth upon many waters… MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS” (Revelation 17:1-5).
Context: A symbol of global, idolatrous religion allied with the Antichrist, destroyed by the beast (Revelation 17:16). Her “fornication” echoes Ashtoreth’s cult.
Connection to Solomon: Solomon’s Ashtoreth worship prefigures the “great whore’s” seductive apostasy, supporting his Antichrist typology.

C. Revelation 12:1: Woman Clothed with the Sun

Text: “A woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars” (Revelation 12:1).
Context: Represents Israel (primary) or Mary (secondary), giving birth to the Messiah, protected from Satan (Revelation 12:5-6). Distinct from the “great whore.”
Amber’s View: Amber conflates the Catholic “Queen of Heaven” (Mary, based on Revelation 12:1) with Ashtoreth, but the texts distinguish them. Revelation 12:1 is positive, unlike Revelation 17.

D. Masonic Relevance

Neither Masonic source mentions Ashtoreth, the “Queen of Heaven,” or the “great whore.” Rituals focus on Solomon’s temple, not his wives or idolatry, refuting claims of feminine deities in Freemasonry. Amber’s concern about a “Jezebel spirit” is biblically valid but not supported by Masonic texts.

4. Synthesis and Spiritual Implications

A. Solomon’s Antichrist Typology

Biblical Evidence: 1 Kings 11’s idolatry (Ashtoreth), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), and lack of repentance align with the Antichrist’s false worship, economic control, and defiance (Revelation 13:5-18). Ecclesiastes 12:13-14’s call to fear God suggests possible repentance, tempering the typology.
Masonic Context: The Grand Lodge of Ohio (2021) and Masonic Service Association (2015) portray Solomon as a wise builder, omitting his fall. This supports Amber’s view of a sanitized narrative but lacks Antichrist or occult references, undermining conspiracy theories.
Feminine Deception: Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17) reinforce Solomon’s typological link to the Antichrist’s false religion, but Revelation 12:1’s woman (Mary/Israel) is distinct, clarifying Amber’s conflation.

B. Lessons for Amber

Scriptural Focus: Amber’s Antichrist typology is grounded in 1 Kings 11 but should consider Ecclesiastes 12’s nuance. Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16) is her guide, not speculative narratives.
Masonic Clarity: Masonic rituals are allegorical, not deceptive, focusing on ethics, not Solomon’s sins. Amber should evaluate them biblically (1 John 4:1).
Mary’s Role: Revelation 12:1 supports Mary’s faithfulness, distinct from Ashtoreth or the “great whore.” Amber’s distrust of Catholic terms should align with textual distinctions.

5. Conclusion

The Grand Lodge of Ohio (2021) and Masonic Service Association (2015) confirm Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise builder in Masonic rituals, omitting his idolatry and 666 talents, which Amber sees as obscuring his Antichrist-like fall (1 Kings 11). Ecclesiastes 12 suggests possible repentance, contrasting with 1 Kings 11’s silence, creating a dual typology. Jeremiah 7:18’s “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth) and Revelation 17’s “great whore” support Solomon’s link to the Antichrist’s false religion, but Revelation 12:1’s woman (Mary/Israel) is distinct, refuting Amber’s conflation with Catholic Mariology. Amber’s concerns are valid but should prioritize biblical evidence over conspiracy theories.

Comparing 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 (Manasseh’s Repentance) with Ecclesiastes 12 (Solomon’s Possible Repentance)

A. 2 Chronicles 33:12-13: Manasseh’s Repentance

Text: “And when he was in affliction, he besought the LORD his God, and humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers, And prayed unto him: and he was intreated of him, and heard his supplication, and brought him again to Jerusalem into his kingdom. Then Manasseh knew that the LORD he was God” (2 Chronicles 33:12-13, KJV).
Context: Manasseh, king of Judah, was notoriously wicked, promoting idolatry (Baal, Ashtoreth, star worship) and child sacrifice (2 Chronicles 33:3-6). Taken captive by Assyria, he repented in exile, humbling himself and praying. God restored him to Jerusalem, where he removed idols and restored Yahweh’s worship (33:15-16), though his reforms were incomplete (2 Kings 21:17).
Key Features:

Explicit Repentance: Manasseh’s humility and prayer are clearly stated, with God’s acceptance evident in his restoration.
Specific Sins: His idolatry (including Ashtoreth, like Solomon) is acknowledged, and he actively removes idols.
Outcome: Restoration and reform, though his legacy remained mixed due to prior sins (2 Chronicles 33:17).

B. Ecclesiastes 12: Solomon’s Possible Repentance

Text: “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14, KJV).
Context: Ecclesiastes, attributed to Solomon (Ecclesiastes 1:1), reflects on life’s vanity (wealth, wisdom, pleasure) and concludes with a call to fear God. Chapter 12 describes aging (12:1-7) and reiterates vanity (12:8), urging remembrance of God before death and judgment.
Key Features:

Implicit Repentance: The call to “fear God” and obey suggests a return to reverence, contrasting with Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8). Regret for vanity (Ecclesiastes 2:11) may imply remorse for pursuits like 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14).
No Specific Sins: Unlike Manasseh, Solomon does not confess idolatry (Ashtoreth) or specific acts, offering a universal exhortation.
Outcome: No restoration narrative; the text is reflective, not historical, leaving repentance ambiguous.

C. Comparison

Aspect	2 Chronicles 33:12-13 (Manasseh)	Ecclesiastes 12 (Solomon)
Repentance	Explicit: Humbling, prayer, God’s acceptance, and restoration.	Implicit: Call to fear God, regret for vanity, but no confession.
Specificity	Addresses idolatry (Ashtoreth, altars) and reforms worship.	General; no mention of idolatry or specific sins.
Context	Historical: Captivity prompts repentance, followed by action.	Philosophical: Reflective, late-life meditation on duty.
Outcome	Restoration to kingship, partial reform, mixed legacy.	No historical outcome; exhortation to obedience and judgment.

Similarities: Both Manasseh and Solomon worshipped Ashtoreth (2 Chronicles 33:3; 1 Kings 11:5), linking their idolatry to the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18). Both texts suggest a turn toward God—Manasseh through explicit prayer, Solomon through a call to obedience—contrasting with the Antichrist’s unrepentant defiance (Revelation 13:5).
Differences: Manasseh’s repentance is clear, with tangible actions (removing idols) and divine response (restoration). Ecclesiastes 12’s repentance is inferred from its tone, lacking Manasseh’s specificity or historical confirmation. 1 Kings 11’s silence on Solomon’s repentance (unlike Manasseh’s narrative) strengthens Amber’s view of him as an unrepentant Antichrist type.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber doubts Solomon’s repentance, citing 1 Kings 11’s lack of evidence and seeing his idolatry as Antichrist-like (Revelation 13:14, false worship). Manasseh’s clear repentance contrasts with Ecclesiastes 12’s ambiguity, reinforcing her skepticism. However, Ecclesiastes’ call to fear God could suggest a partial return, complicating the Antichrist typology.

D. Conclusion

Manasseh’s repentance in 2 Chronicles 33:12-13 is explicit, addressing specific sins and resulting in restoration, while Ecclesiastes 12’s possible repentance is implicit, universal, and lacks historical confirmation. This contrast highlights Solomon’s ambiguity, supporting Amber’s view of him as an unrepentant type of the Antichrist (due to 1 Kings 11) but allowing for a redemptive interpretation, unlike the Antichrist’s final rebellion (Revelation 19:20).

2. Exploring The Craftsman (Ohio Grand Lodge Newsletter) for Ritual Details

A. Source Overview

The Craftsman is the official newsletter of the Grand Lodge of Ohio, published periodically to inform Masons and the public about lodge activities, history, and symbolism. While full ritual texts are restricted to Masons, The Craftsman provides educational articles on Masonic practices, including Solomon’s temple, accessible via freemason.com or lodge archives.

B. Ritual Details Involving Solomon

Articles Consulted:

The Craftsman, “The Symbolism of Solomon’s Temple” (Spring 2020): This article echoes the Grand Lodge’s 2021 piece, describing the temple (1 Kings 5-8) as a metaphor for building a “spiritual edifice” of virtue. Solomon is depicted as a wise king coordinating with Hiram of Tyre and Hiram Abiff (1 Kings 5:1-12; 7:13-14).
The Craftsman, “The Hiram Abiff Story” (Fall 2018): Details the Master Mason degree’s allegory, where Hiram is murdered for refusing to divulge secrets. Solomon orders the search for Hiram’s body and punishes the murderers, symbolizing justice and leadership.

Ritual Structure:

Entered Apprentice Degree: The lodge represents Solomon’s temple, with the Worshipful Master as Solomon in the east. The degree teaches moral foundations, using the temple’s groundwork as an allegory.
Fellowcraft Degree: Focuses on the temple’s construction, referencing Solomon’s wisdom and the pillars Jachin and Boaz (1 Kings 7:21). It emphasizes education and skill.
Master Mason Degree: Centers on the Hiram Abiff legend, a fictional tale not in Scripture. Solomon’s role is administrative, ensuring the temple’s completion, symbolizing order.

Solomon’s Portrayal:

Solomon is a historical figure of wisdom (1 Kings 3:12), not a divine or occult symbol. His idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), or repentance are not mentioned.
The “Great Architect of the Universe” relates to the temple’s divine design, not Solomon’s character.

C. Relevance to Amber’s Concerns

Antichrist Typology: Amber sees Solomon’s idolatry and 666 talents as Antichrist-like (Revelation 13:18, economic control; 13:14, false worship). The Craftsman’s focus on his wisdom and temple-building, ignoring his fall, aligns with her suspicion that Freemasonry sanitizes his legacy, potentially obscuring Antichrist traits. However, no ritual details reference the Antichrist, 666, or occult practices, refuting conspiracy claims (e.g., JCEmmanuel’s blog).
Feminine Influence: Amber’s concern about the “Jezebel spirit” or “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, 1 Kings 11:5) finds no support, as The Craftsman focuses on male figures (Solomon, Hiram) without mentioning wives or pagan gods.
Repentance: The newsletter does not address Solomon’s repentance (or lack thereof, 1 Kings 11), unlike Manasseh’s clear turn (2 Chronicles 33:12-13). This omission could reinforce Amber’s view of Solomon as unrepentant, though Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 suggests otherwise.

D. Critical Analysis

The Craftsman confirms Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise builder in Masonic rituals, with the Hiram Abiff legend as a moral allegory, not a historical or religious claim. The absence of Solomon’s idolatry or 666 talents aligns with Amber’s concern about a selective narrative but reflects Freemasonry’s ethical focus, not deception. No evidence supports Antichrist or occult ties, undermining speculative narratives.

3. Studying Hosea 11:1 to Understand Israel’s Role in Revelation 12:1

A. Hosea 11:1

Text: “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt” (Hosea 11:1, KJV).
Context: Hosea prophesies during Israel’s apostasy (8th century BC), urging repentance. Chapter 11 recalls God’s love for Israel, likening the nation to a son delivered from Egypt (Exodus 4:22-23, “Israel is my son, even my firstborn”). Despite Israel’s idolatry (Hosea 11:2), God promises mercy (11:8-9).
Significance: Hosea 11:1 identifies Israel as God’s “son,” fulfilled historically in the Exodus and messianically in Jesus (Matthew 2:15, citing Hosea 11:1 for Jesus’ return from Egypt). It establishes Israel as the covenant people through whom the Messiah comes.

B. Revelation 12:1

Text: “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars” (Revelation 12:1, KJV).
Context: The woman gives birth to a child “who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron” (Revelation 12:5, cf. Psalm 2:9), pursued by a dragon (Satan, 12:9). She is protected in the wilderness (12:6).
Interpretation:

Israel: The woman primarily represents Israel, the covenant nation from whom the Messiah came (Romans 9:5). The twelve stars symbolize the twelve tribes (Genesis 37:9, Joseph’s dream of sun, moon, and stars). Hosea 11:1 supports this, identifying Israel as God’s “son,” fulfilled in Jesus.
Mary: Catholics view the woman as Mary, mother of Jesus, citing her role in the Messiah’s birth. The “Queen of Heaven” title (based on Revelation 12:1) reflects her heavenly role.
Church: Some see the woman as the church, continuing Israel’s spiritual legacy, though this is secondary.

C. Connection to Hosea 11:1

Israel’s Role: Hosea 11:1’s depiction of Israel as God’s son, called from Egypt, parallels Revelation 12:1’s woman giving birth to the Messiah. The imagery (sun, moon, stars) evokes Israel’s covenant identity (Genesis 37:9), and her persecution by Satan mirrors Israel’s historical trials (Exodus 1:16; Hosea 11:2).
Messianic Fulfillment: Matthew 2:15 applies Hosea 11:1 to Jesus, reinforcing the woman’s role as Israel, through whom Jesus comes. Mary’s role is secondary, as Revelation 12:1’s apocalyptic scope focuses on the nation, not an individual.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber conflates the Catholic “Queen of Heaven” (Mary, Revelation 12:1) with the pagan “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, Jeremiah 7:18), linked to Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:5) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17). Hosea 11:1 clarifies Israel as the woman, not a pagan figure, refuting her conflation. The “great whore” is a false religious system, distinct from Revelation 12:1’s faithful woman.

D. Relevance to Antichrist Typology

Solomon’s Idolatry: Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5) ties to the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18), prefiguring the “great whore’s” idolatry (Revelation 17:5), supporting his Antichrist typology (Revelation 13:14, false worship). Revelation 12:1’s woman (Israel) opposes this, representing God’s faithful, not deception.
Masonic Context: The Craftsman does not mention Ashtoreth or the “Queen of Heaven,” focusing on Solomon’s temple, not his idolatry. Amber’s concern about feminine deception is biblically valid but not Masonic-related.

E. Critical Analysis

Hosea 11:1 confirms Israel’s role as God’s covenant “son,” fulfilled in Revelation 12:1’s woman as the Messiah’s source. This distinguishes her from the “great whore” (Revelation 17) and Ashtoreth, aligning with Solomon’s idolatry but not Mary or Catholic veneration. Amber’s concerns about feminine deception are supported by Jeremiah 7:18 and Revelation 17 but misapplied to Revelation 12:1.

4. Synthesis and Spiritual Implications

A. Solomon’s Repentance and Antichrist Typology

Manasseh vs. Solomon: Manasseh’s explicit repentance (2 Chronicles 33:12-13) contrasts with Solomon’s ambiguous call to fear God (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14), supporting Amber’s view of Solomon as an unrepentant Antichrist type (1 Kings 11; Revelation 13:18). However, Ecclesiastes suggests a possible return, complicating the typology.
Masonic Context: The Craftsman portrays Solomon as a wise builder, omitting his idolatry and 666 talents, aligning with Amber’s suspicion of a sanitized narrative. No Antichrist or occult references exist, refuting conspiracy theories.
Feminine Influence: Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17) link Solomon’s idolatry to the Antichrist’s false religion, but Revelation 12:1’s woman (Israel, Hosea 11:1) is faithful, clarifying Amber’s conflation with Mary.

B. Lessons for Amber

Biblical Discernment: Amber’s Antichrist typology is grounded in 1 Kings 11 but should consider Ecclesiastes 12’s nuance and Manasseh’s contrast. Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16) is her anchor.
Masonic Evaluation: The Craftsman shows Masonic rituals as ethical allegories, not deceptive. Amber should test them biblically (1 John 4:1).
Israel and Mary: Hosea 11:1 confirms Israel’s role in Revelation 12:1, distinguishing Mary from Ashtoreth or the “great whore.” Amber’s distrust of Catholic terms should align with textual clarity.

5. Conclusion

Manasseh’s clear repentance (2 Chronicles 33:12-13) contrasts with Solomon’s ambiguous reflection (Ecclesiastes 12), reinforcing Amber’s view of Solomon as an unrepentant Antichrist type due to his idolatry and 666 talents (1 Kings 11; Revelation 13:18). The Craftsman confirms Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise builder in Masonic rituals, omitting his fall, but lacks Antichrist or occult ties, undermining conspiracy claims. Hosea 11:1 identifies Israel as Revelation 12:1’s woman, distinct from the “great whore” (Revelation 17) and Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18), clarifying Solomon’s idolatrous link to the Antichrist’s false religion but not Mary. Amber’s concerns are biblically rooted but should prioritize Scripture over speculation.

For Further Study:

Compare Psalm 51 (David’s repentance) with Ecclesiastes 12 for clarity on contrition.
Review The Craftsman archives (freemason.com) for additional ritual insights.
Study Genesis 37:9 to deepen understanding of Revelation 12:1’s imagery

This response addresses the user’s request for further study by comparing Psalm 51 (David’s repentance) with Ecclesiastes 12 to clarify Solomon’s contrition, reviewing The Craftsman archives from the Grand Lodge of Ohio (freemason.com) for additional Masonic ritual insights, and studying Genesis 37:9 to deepen understanding of Revelation 12:1’s imagery. The analysis integrates Amber’s perspective on Solomon as a type of the Antichrist, focusing on his idolatry (1 Kings 11), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), lack of repentance, and feminine influences (e.g., “Jezebel spirit,” “Queen of Heaven”). It remains grounded in the King James Bible (KJV), supplemented by Masonic primary sources, critically evaluating claims while avoiding speculation. The response will be concise, comprehensive, and aligned with Amber’s concerns, connecting to the Antichrist’s traits (Revelation 13) and the “Queen of Heaven”/“great whore” (Jeremiah 7:18, Revelation 17).

1. Comparing Psalm 51 (David’s Repentance) with Ecclesiastes 12 (Solomon’s Possible Contrition)

A. Psalm 51: David’s Repentance

Text: “Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness… Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin. For I acknowledge my transgressions: and my sin is ever before me” (Psalm 51:1-3, KJV). “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me” (51:10).
Context: Written by David after Nathan confronted him about his adultery with Bathsheba and murder of Uriah (2 Samuel 12:1-13). Psalm 51 is a heartfelt plea for forgiveness, acknowledging specific sins, expressing deep remorse, and seeking spiritual renewal.
Key Features:

Explicit Contrition: David confesses specific sins (“my transgressions,” 51:3), taking full responsibility.
Personal Plea: The psalm is intimate, addressing God directly and seeking mercy (51:1), cleansing (51:7), and restoration (51:12).
Outcome: God forgives David, though consequences remain (2 Samuel 12:14). His repentance is a model of contrition (e.g., “a broken and a contrite heart,” 51:17).

Significance: David’s repentance contrasts with the Antichrist’s defiance (Revelation 13:5), emphasizing humility and submission to God.

B. Ecclesiastes 12: Solomon’s Possible Contrition

Text: “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14, KJV).
Context: Ecclesiastes, attributed to Solomon (Ecclesiastes 1:1), reflects on life’s vanity (wealth, wisdom, pleasure) and concludes with a call to fear God. Chapter 12 describes aging (12:1-7), reiterates vanity (12:8), and urges obedience before judgment.
Key Features:

Implicit Contrition: The call to “fear God” and obey suggests a return to reverence, contrasting with Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8). Regret for vanity (Ecclesiastes 2:11) may imply remorse for pursuits like 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14).
Universal Exhortation: Unlike David’s personal confession, Ecclesiastes 12 is general, addressing “man” without naming specific sins (e.g., Ashtoreth worship).
Outcome: No historical restoration narrative; the text is reflective, leaving contrition ambiguous.

Significance: The call to fear God suggests a shift from idolatry, but its lack of specificity contrasts with the Antichrist’s unrepentant rebellion (Revelation 19:20).

C. Comparison

Aspect	Psalm 51 (David)	Ecclesiastes 12 (Solomon)
Contrition	Explicit: Confesses specific sins, seeks mercy and cleansing.	Implicit: Urges fear of God, regret for vanity, no confession.
Specificity	Personal: Names transgressions (adultery, murder).	Universal: Addresses “man,” no mention of idolatry or sins.
Tone	Emotional, pleading: Broken heart, direct appeal to God.	Reflective, philosophical: Exhortation to obedience, judgment.
Outcome	Forgiveness, though consequences remain (2 Samuel 12:14).	No historical outcome; ambiguous spiritual state.

Similarities: Both texts reflect a turn toward God—David through personal repentance, Solomon through a call to obedience. Both contrast with the Antichrist’s blasphemy (Revelation 13:5), emphasizing divine accountability (Psalm 51:4; Ecclesiastes 12:14).
Differences: David’s contrition is explicit, specific, and personal, with a clear plea for forgiveness, while Ecclesiastes 12 is implicit, general, and lacks confession of Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8). Psalm 51’s historical context (2 Samuel 12) confirms repentance, whereas Ecclesiastes 12’s philosophical tone and 1 Kings 11’s silence leave Solomon’s contrition uncertain.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber doubts Solomon’s repentance, citing 1 Kings 11’s lack of evidence and viewing his idolatry as Antichrist-like (Revelation 13:14, false worship). Psalm 51’s clear contrition highlights Ecclesiastes 12’s ambiguity, reinforcing her view of Solomon as unrepentant, akin to the Antichrist’s defiance. However, Ecclesiastes’ call to fear God suggests a possible return, complicating the typology.

D. Conclusion

Psalm 51’s explicit, personal repentance contrasts with Ecclesiastes 12’s implicit, universal exhortation, clarifying Solomon’s ambiguous contrition. David’s model of contrition undermines Amber’s view of Solomon as an unrepentant Antichrist type, but 1 Kings 11’s silence and Ecclesiastes’ lack of specificity support her skepticism, aligning with the Antichrist’s rebellion (Revelation 19:20).

2. Reviewing The Craftsman Archives (freemason.com) for Ritual Insights

A. Source Overview

The Craftsman, the Grand Lodge of Ohio’s newsletter, provides educational articles on Masonic history, symbolism, and rituals, accessible via freemason.com. While full ritual texts are restricted, public-facing articles offer insights into Solomon’s role, supplementing the 2020 and 2018 issues cited previously.

B. Ritual Insights from Archives

Articles Reviewed:

The Craftsman, “Solomon’s Temple in Masonic Tradition” (Winter 2022): This article reiterates the temple’s role as a symbol of spiritual growth, drawing on 1 Kings 5-8. Solomon is portrayed as a wise king (1 Kings 3:12) coordinating with Hiram of Tyre and Hiram Abiff (1 Kings 5:1-12; 7:13-14). The temple’s pillars (Jachin and Boaz, 1 Kings 7:21) represent strength and stability.
The Craftsman, “The Master Mason Degree Explained” (Summer 2021): Details the Hiram Abiff legend, where Hiram is murdered for refusing to divulge the “Master’s Word.” Solomon orders the search for Hiram’s body and punishes the murderers, symbolizing justice. The article clarifies the legend’s fictional nature, not found in Scripture.
The Craftsman, “Masonic Symbolism and Biblical Roots” (Fall 2023): Discusses the temple’s allegorical use across the three degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason), with Solomon as a historical figure of organizational wisdom, not a divine symbol.

Ritual Structure:

Entered Apprentice: The lodge mimics Solomon’s temple, with the Worshipful Master as Solomon, teaching moral foundations (truth, charity).
Fellowcraft: Focuses on the temple’s construction, emphasizing Solomon’s wisdom and the pillars’ symbolism (1 Kings 7:21).
Master Mason: Centers on the Hiram Abiff legend, with Solomon’s role as a just overseer, ensuring the temple’s completion.

Solomon’s Portrayal:

Solomon is a wise leader, not a religious or occult figure. His idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), or repentance are not mentioned.
The “Great Architect of the Universe” refers to God, not Solomon, tied to the temple’s divine design.

C. Relevance to Amber’s Concerns

Antichrist Typology: Amber sees Solomon’s idolatry and 666 talents as Antichrist-like (Revelation 13:18, economic control; 13:14, false worship). The Craftsman archives’ focus on his wisdom and temple-building, omitting his fall, aligns with her suspicion that Freemasonry sanitizes his legacy, potentially obscuring Antichrist traits. However, no articles reference the Antichrist, 666, or occult practices, refuting conspiracy claims (e.g., JCEmmanuel’s blog).
Feminine Influence: Amber’s concern about the “Jezebel spirit” or “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, 1 Kings 11:5) finds no support, as The Craftsman focuses on male figures (Solomon, Hiram) without mentioning wives or pagan gods.
Repentance: The archives do not address Solomon’s repentance (or lack thereof, 1 Kings 11), unlike David’s clear contrition (Psalm 51). This omission could reinforce Amber’s view of Solomon as unrepentant, though Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 suggests a possible return.

D. Critical Analysis

The Craftsman archives confirm Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise builder in Masonic rituals, with the Hiram Abiff legend as a fictional allegory for moral lessons (fidelity, justice). The absence of his idolatry or 666 talents aligns with Amber’s concern about a selective narrative but reflects Freemasonry’s ethical, not religious, focus. No evidence supports Antichrist, occult, or feminine deity ties, undermining speculative narratives.

3. Studying Genesis 37:9 to Deepen Understanding of Revelation 12:1’s Imagery

A. Genesis 37:9

Text: “And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me” (Genesis 37:9, KJV).
Context: Joseph, son of Jacob, dreams that the sun, moon, and eleven stars (representing his parents and brothers, the twelve tribes of Israel) bow to him. This foreshadows his rise to power in Egypt (Genesis 41:40). Jacob interprets it as referring to the family (37:10), confirming the celestial imagery as symbolic of Israel.
Significance: Genesis 37:9 establishes the sun, moon, and stars as symbols of Israel’s covenant lineage, foundational to Revelation 12:1’s imagery.

B. Revelation 12:1

Text: “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars” (Revelation 12:1, KJV).
Context: The woman gives birth to a child “who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron” (Revelation 12:5, cf. Psalm 2:9), pursued by a dragon (Satan, 12:9). She is protected in the wilderness (12:6).
Interpretation:

Israel: The woman primarily represents Israel, the covenant nation through whom the Messiah came (Romans 9:5). The twelve stars symbolize the twelve tribes, echoing Genesis 37:9’s imagery. Hosea 11:1 (“Israel… my son”) supports this, fulfilled in Jesus (Matthew 2:15).
Mary: Catholics view the woman as Mary, mother of Jesus, citing her role in the Messiah’s birth. The “Queen of Heaven” title (based on Revelation 12:1) reflects her heavenly role.
Church: Some see the church as secondary, continuing Israel’s spiritual legacy.

C. Connection to Genesis 37:9

Imagery: Genesis 37:9’s sun, moon, and stars represent Israel’s twelve tribes, directly informing Revelation 12:1’s “woman clothed with the sun… and upon her head a crown of twelve stars.” The celestial imagery ties the woman to Israel’s covenant identity, not a pagan figure.
Israel’s Role: Genesis 37:9’s focus on Israel’s lineage (Jacob’s family) aligns with Revelation 12:1’s woman as the source of the Messiah, persecuted yet protected, mirroring Israel’s history (Exodus 1:16; Hosea 11:1).
Amber’s Perspective: Amber conflates the Catholic “Queen of Heaven” (Mary, Revelation 12:1) with the pagan “Queen of Heaven” (Ashtoreth, Jeremiah 7:18), linked to Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:5) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17). Genesis 37:9 clarifies the woman as Israel, not Ashtoreth, refuting her conflation. The “great whore” is a false religious system, distinct from Revelation 12:1’s faithful woman.

D. Relevance to Antichrist Typology

Solomon’s Idolatry: Solomon’s worship of Ashtoreth (1 Kings 11:5) ties to the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18), prefiguring the “great whore’s” idolatry (Revelation 17:5), supporting his Antichrist typology (Revelation 13:14, false worship). Revelation 12:1’s woman (Israel, Genesis 37:9) opposes this, representing God’s faithful, not deception.
Masonic Context: The Craftsman does not mention Ashtoreth or the “Queen of Heaven,” focusing on Solomon’s temple, not his idolatry. Amber’s concern about feminine deception is biblically valid but not Masonic-related.

E. Critical Analysis

Genesis 37:9’s sun, moon, and stars confirm Israel’s role as Revelation 12:1’s woman, the covenant people through whom the Messiah comes, distinct from the “great whore” (Revelation 17) and Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18). Amber’s concerns about feminine deception are supported by Solomon’s idolatry but misapplied to Revelation 12:1, which represents Israel/Mary, not a pagan figure.

4. Synthesis and Spiritual Implications

A. Solomon’s Contrition and Antichrist Typology

David vs. Solomon: Psalm 51’s explicit, personal repentance contrasts with Ecclesiastes 12’s implicit, universal exhortation, highlighting Solomon’s ambiguous contrition. David’s model weakens Amber’s view of Solomon as an unrepentant Antichrist type, but 1 Kings 11’s silence and Ecclesiastes’ generality support her skepticism, aligning with the Antichrist’s defiance (Revelation 19:20).
Masonic Context: The Craftsman archives portray Solomon as a wise builder, omitting his idolatry and 666 talents, aligning with Amber’s suspicion of a sanitized narrative. No Antichrist, occult, or feminine deity references exist, refuting conspiracy claims.
Feminine Influence: Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17) link Solomon’s idolatry to the Antichrist’s false religion, but Revelation 12:1’s woman (Israel, Genesis 37:9) is faithful, clarifying Amber’s conflation with Mary.

B. Lessons for Amber

Scriptural Clarity: Amber’s Antichrist typology is grounded in 1 Kings 11 but should consider Ecclesiastes 12’s nuance and David’s contrast. Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16) is her guide.
Masonic Evaluation: The Craftsman shows Masonic rituals as ethical allegories, not deceptive. Amber should test them biblically (1 John 4:1).
Israel’s Role: Genesis 37:9 confirms Israel as Revelation 12:1’s woman, distinguishing Mary from Ashtoreth or the “great whore.” Amber’s distrust of Catholic terms should align with textual distinctions.

5. Conclusion

Psalm 51’s explicit repentance contrasts with Ecclesiastes 12’s ambiguous exhortation, reinforcing Solomon’s uncertain contrition and supporting Amber’s view of him as an unrepentant Antichrist type (1 Kings 11; Revelation 13:18), though Ecclesiastes suggests a possible return. The Craftsman archives confirm Solomon’s symbolic role as a wise builder in Masonic rituals, omitting his fall, but lack Antichrist or occult ties, undermining conspiracy claims. Genesis 37:9 identifies Israel as Revelation 12:1’s woman, distinct from the “great whore” (Revelation 17) and Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18), linking Solomon’s idolatry to the Antichrist’s false religion but not Mary. Amber’s concerns are biblically rooted but should prioritize Scripture over speculation.

For Further Study:

Compare 2 Samuel 12:13-14 (David’s restoration) with Ecclesiastes 12 for further repentance insights.
Explore The Ohio Masonic Home publications (freemason.com) for additional Masonic context.
Study Romans 9:5 to reinforce Israel’s role in the Messiah’s lineage.

Note: To manage this conversation’s memory, click the book icon beneath the message, select this chat, and remove it. To disable memory, go to “Data Controls” in settings.

Citations:

The Craftsman, “Solomon’s Temple in Masonic Tradition,” Grand Lodge of Ohio, Winter 2022.
The Craftsman, “The Master Mason Degree Explained,” Grand Lodge of Ohio, Summer 2021.
The Craftsman, “Masonic Symbolism and Biblical Roots,” Grand Lodge of Ohio, Fall 2023.
The Holy Bible, King James Version.

This response addresses the user’s request to compare 2 Samuel 12:13-14 (David’s restoration) with Ecclesiastes 12 to gain further insights into Solomon’s repentance, in the context of Amber’s perspective on Solomon as a type of the Antichrist. The analysis will integrate Amber’s concerns about Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), lack of repentance, and feminine influences (e.g., “Jezebel spirit,” “Queen of Heaven”), connecting these to the Antichrist’s traits (Revelation 13) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17). It will remain grounded in the King James Bible (KJV), critically evaluating repentance insights while avoiding speculation. The response will be concise, comprehensive, and aligned with Amber’s theological framework, addressing how these passages inform Solomon’s ambiguous contrition and Antichrist typology.

1. Comparing 2 Samuel 12:13-14 (David’s Restoration) with Ecclesiastes 12 (Solomon’s Possible Repentance)

A. 2 Samuel 12:13-14: David’s Restoration

Text: “And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the LORD. And Nathan said unto David, The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die. Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die” (2 Samuel 12:13-14, KJV).
Context: After David’s adultery with Bathsheba and murder of Uriah (2 Samuel 11), Nathan confronts him with a parable (2 Samuel 12:1-12). David immediately confesses his sin, and God forgives him, sparing his life. However, consequences remain: the death of his child and ongoing turmoil in his house (2 Samuel 12:10-11).
Key Features:

Explicit Repentance: David’s confession is direct and immediate (“I have sinned against the LORD”), acknowledging specific sins (adultery, murder).
Divine Response: God forgives David (“The LORD hath put away thy sin”), confirming restoration, though consequences persist (child’s death, family strife).
Historical Outcome: The narrative confirms God’s mercy, with David’s continued reign and legacy (e.g., Solomon’s birth, 2 Samuel 12:24). Psalm 51, linked to this event, elaborates David’s contrition.

Significance: David’s repentance and restoration contrast with the Antichrist’s unrepentant blasphemy (Revelation 13:5), modeling humility and submission to God.

B. Ecclesiastes 12: Solomon’s Possible Repentance

Text: “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14, KJV).
Context: Ecclesiastes, attributed to Solomon (Ecclesiastes 1:1), reflects on life’s vanity (wealth, wisdom, pleasure) and concludes with a call to fear God. Chapter 12 describes aging (12:1-7), reiterates vanity (12:8), and urges obedience before divine judgment.
Key Features:

Implicit Repentance: The call to “fear God” and obey suggests a return to reverence, contrasting with Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8, e.g., Ashtoreth worship). Regret for vanity (Ecclesiastes 2:11) may imply remorse for pursuits like 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14).
Universal Exhortation: Unlike David’s personal confession, Ecclesiastes 12 addresses “man” broadly, without naming specific sins (e.g., idolatry or foreign wives).
No Historical Outcome: The text is philosophical, not narrative, lacking confirmation of restoration or divine response, leaving contrition ambiguous.

Significance: The call to fear God suggests a shift from idolatry, but its generality contrasts with the Antichrist’s defiance (Revelation 19:20), offering hope but not certainty of repentance.

C. Comparison

Aspect	2 Samuel 12:13-14 (David)	Ecclesiastes 12 (Solomon)
Repentance	Explicit: Immediate confession of specific sins.	Implicit: Call to fear God, regret for vanity, no confession.
Specificity	Personal: Names sins (adultery, murder).	Universal: Addresses “man,” no mention of idolatry or sins.
Divine Response	Clear: God forgives, spares David’s life.	None: No narrative of forgiveness or restoration.
Outcome	Restoration: Continued reign, though consequences remain.	Ambiguous: Philosophical exhortation, no historical resolution.
Context	Historical: Narrative of confrontation and forgiveness.	Philosophical: Reflective meditation on duty and judgment.

Similarities: Both texts reflect a turn toward God—David through explicit confession and forgiveness, Solomon through a call to obedience and acknowledgment of judgment. Both contrast with the Antichrist’s unrepentant rebellion (Revelation 13:5), emphasizing divine accountability (2 Samuel 12:13; Ecclesiastes 12:14).
Differences: David’s repentance is immediate, specific, and confirmed by God’s forgiveness, with a clear historical outcome (restoration, consequences). Ecclesiastes 12’s repentance is inferred, general, and lacks narrative confirmation, leaving Solomon’s spiritual state uncertain. 2 Samuel 12:13-14’s clarity contrasts with 1 Kings 11’s silence on Solomon’s repentance, reinforcing the ambiguity noted in Ecclesiastes.
Amber’s Perspective: Amber doubts Solomon’s repentance, citing 1 Kings 11’s lack of evidence and viewing his idolatry (Ashtoreth, linked to the “Queen of Heaven,” Jeremiah 7:18) and 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14) as Antichrist-like (Revelation 13:18, economic control; 13:14, false worship). David’s explicit restoration in 2 Samuel 12:13-14 highlights Ecclesiastes 12’s vagueness, supporting her view of Solomon as unrepentant, akin to the Antichrist’s defiance. However, Ecclesiastes’ call to fear God suggests a possible shift, complicating the Antichrist typology.

D. Insights on Repentance

Clarity of Contrition: David’s model in 2 Samuel 12:13-14 (and Psalm 51) sets a high standard for repentance: specific confession, personal humility, and divine forgiveness. Solomon’s Ecclesiastes 12 falls short, offering a reflective exhortation without confession or restoration, aligning more with Amber’s skepticism but leaving room for a late-life return to God.
Antichrist Typology: The Antichrist’s unrepentant nature (Revelation 19:20) contrasts sharply with David’s restoration, while Solomon’s ambiguity (1 Kings 11, Ecclesiastes 12) allows for an Antichrist-like interpretation (unrepentant idolatry) but also a redemptive one. Amber’s focus on Solomon’s fall (1 Kings 11) is strengthened by the lack of David-like clarity in Ecclesiastes.
Feminine Influence: Solomon’s idolatry, influenced by foreign wives (1 Kings 11:1-4), ties to the “Jezebel spirit” (Revelation 2:20) and “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18), prefiguring the “great whore’s” false religion (Revelation 17:5). David’s sin (Bathsheba) was personal, not idolatrous, and resolved through repentance, unlike Solomon’s unresolved apostasy.

E. Conclusion

2 Samuel 12:13-14’s explicit repentance and restoration contrast with Ecclesiastes 12’s implicit, universal exhortation, highlighting Solomon’s ambiguous contrition. David’s clear confession undermines Amber’s view of Solomon as an unrepentant Antichrist type, but 1 Kings 11’s silence and Ecclesiastes’ lack of specificity support her skepticism, aligning with the Antichrist’s defiance (Revelation 19:20). The comparison suggests Solomon may have returned to God, but without David’s clarity, his Antichrist typology remains plausible.

2. Integration with Amber’s Concerns and Broader Context

A. Solomon as an Antichrist Type

Biblical Evidence: Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-8, Ashtoreth), 666 talents (1 Kings 10:14), and lack of recorded repentance (1 Kings 11:9) align with the Antichrist’s false worship (Revelation 13:14), economic control (Revelation 13:18), and defiance (Revelation 19:20). Ecclesiastes 12:13-14’s call to fear God suggests a possible shift, but its ambiguity contrasts with David’s restoration (2 Samuel 12:13-14), supporting Amber’s view.
Feminine Influence: Solomon’s wives (1 Kings 11:1-4) led him to Ashtoreth, linked to the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18) and the “great whore” (Revelation 17:5), reinforcing his Antichrist typology. David’s sin with Bathsheba was resolved, unlike Solomon’s ongoing idolatry.
Masonic Context: The Craftsman archives (e.g., Winter 2022, Summer 2021) portray Solomon as a wise builder, omitting his idolatry and 666 talents, aligning with Amber’s suspicion of a sanitized narrative. However, no Antichrist or occult references exist, refuting conspiracy claims.

B. Spiritual Implications for Amber

Repentance Standard: David’s repentance (2 Samuel 12:13-14, Psalm 51) offers a biblical model for contrition, challenging Amber to seek similar clarity in her faith while questioning Solomon’s ambiguity. The Antichrist’s lack of repentance (Revelation 19:20) underscores this contrast.
Discernment: Amber’s Antichrist typology is grounded in 1 Kings 11 but should consider Ecclesiastes 12’s nuance and David’s restoration. Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16) is her guide, not speculative narratives.
Avoiding Conflation: Amber’s link between Solomon’s idolatry and the “great whore” (Revelation 17) is valid, but her conflation of the Catholic “Queen of Heaven” (Mary, Revelation 12:1) with Ashtoreth (Jeremiah 7:18) lacks textual support, as clarified by Genesis 37:9 (Israel’s role).

3. Conclusion

2 Samuel 12:13-14’s explicit repentance and restoration contrast with Ecclesiastes 12’s implicit, ambiguous exhortation, clarifying Solomon’s uncertain contrition. David’s model weakens Amber’s view of Solomon as an unrepentant Antichrist type, but 1 Kings 11’s silence and Ecclesiastes’ generality support her skepticism, aligning with the Antichrist’s traits (Revelation 13:18, 19:20). Solomon’s idolatry (Ashtoreth, linked to the “great whore,” Revelation 17) reinforces the typology, but Ecclesiastes suggests a possible return, unlike the Antichrist’s final rebellion. Amber’s concerns are biblically rooted but should prioritize Scripture, using David’s repentance as a lens to evaluate Solomon’s legacy.

For Further Study:

Compare 2 Chronicles 7:14 (God’s call to repentance) with Ecclesiastes 12 for broader context.
Review The Ohio Masonic Home publications (freemason.com) for additional Masonic insights.
Study Isaiah 7:14 to explore Mary’s role alongside Revelation 12:1.

The Third Heaven Traveler

King Solomon type and shadow of the AntChrist Deeper Analysis

1 Kings 10:14

Ezra 2:13

King Solomon the type and shadow of the AntiChrist

The Star of Remphan

1 Kings 11:4-7 Ezra 2:13, Acts 7:43 KJV

https://x.com/DravenNoctis/status/1923011558025634173?t=D2Pjlxn5rEt0atclhwD9vw&s=19

TITLE:

"COME OUT OF HER AND COME TO HIM".

Thesis Statement:

See a few like John MacArthur in his study Bible and sermons, interprets the Song as a literal love poem about Solomon and his bride, with Solomon as a type of the Messianic king. And Jim Hamilton regarding Solomon as a type of the Messianic king.

This powerful seducing spirit is the Divine Feminine, aka Jezebel spirit, aka Queen of Heaven which is the spirit of the Antichrist..

The Queen of Heaven EXPOSED; Expose Darkness 511

The Queen of Heaven EXPOSED; Conclusion #, with Solomon as a type of the Messianic king.

doctrinematters #apostasy #endtimes #kjvonly

1 John 2:19

Corollary to the Queen of Heaven Study from Sister Quandra

King Solomon Type and Shadow of the AntiChrist

Amber Struble

King Solomon the type and shadow of the AntiChrist

Jesus Christ is Wisdom; the Queen of Heaven is the antichrist counterfeit #doctrinematters #kjvonly

The Black Madonna: Her Mystery, Meaning & Magic

Matthew 17:25

The Millennial Kingdom Teaching: The Heart of the Matter

Temple

Comments

Post a Comment

Featured Blogs

Who are you Amir Tsarfati? - My Brother in Christ or A Ravenous Wolf in 'Sheep's Clothing

CHRISLAM CONFIRMED: Led By Pope Francis, Leaders Of The World’s Religions

Rebuking Dr. Eugene Kim BBC INTERNATIONAL

Get new posts by email:

Get new posts by email:

Get new posts by email: