Another Paul hater; SIR Escano REPENT! The Lord Rebuke you in the name of Jesus
The content provided on this website is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Any copyrighted material included herein is used under the doctrine of fair use, as outlined in Title 17 U.S. Code § 107. This includes use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. The use of such material is not intended to infringe upon the copyright holder's rights and is limited to the extent necessary for these purposes.
1 Timothy 4:1
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;”
King James Version (KJV)
https://x.com/EscanorReloaded/status/1959182848851624011
SIR Escano REPENT! The Lord Rebuke you in the name of Jesus... I am praying for you.
You are standing before Galatians 1:8,9 KJV for preaching another GOSPEL. You defy Peter in 2 Peter 3:16 KJV in that you prove yourself UNLEARNED and UNSTABLE wrestle with Paul's Epistles to your own destruction.
See my full detailed study on the MYSTERY
You are saying heretical and most blasphemous things. To summarize:
You SIR, are using Philosophy and Vain deceit and not after Christ (Colossians 2:8 KJV). You speak in your carnal mind which is enmity against God (Romans 8:7 KJV) to understand the things of God. Your carnal mind can not comprehend the things of the Spirit and you are not comparing spiritual with spiritual. ( 1 Corinthians 2:14 KJV) Why? You are deceived by the god of this world who has blinded your mind. 2 Corinthians 4:4 kjv. Please REPENT! Please read James 3:1 KJV. It is a very serious matter when you go around teaching using the word of God.
There is nothing new under the sun. SIR Escano you have been bitten by the same serpent that bit Eve in the garden.
You need the Antivenom as in Exodus with the Bronze Serpent- YOU NEED JESUS CHRIST.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/08/jesus-christ-antivenom-christian.html
Next you need DOCTRINE:
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/01/let-us-examine-ourselves-gospel-kjv.html
The Serpent said to Eve “
3 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Please see this powerful study by Brother Cameron Moshfegh on this.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/07/the-study-of-scripture-for-doctrine-and_31.html
Please read my study on IF YOU DENY PAUL you are denying Jesus Christ. The reason you teach these blasphemous things against Paul is because he was given the MYSTERY which gives us:
What most do not understand is that the MYSTERY revealed to Paul by Jesus Christ is 3 parts: 1. The Gospel of Grace which most do not understand, 2. The Church is Israel - who also include the Old Testament Saints, The Jewish Remnant and Tribulation Saints saved during the Tribulation. 3. The PreTribulation Rapture.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/02/the-church-of-laodicea-does-not-know.html
The "mystery" of Paul's gospel, revealed progressively after Israel's rejection of the Messiah (Acts 7; Romans 11:25). It's a "dispensation of the grace of God" (Ephesians 3:2) for the Church age, hidden until Paul but now the basis for salvation today. The "etc." in your question likely includes related truths like the indwelling Christ (Colossians 1:26-27) and the Church's heavenly destiny (Ephesians 1:3). To rightly divide the word (2 Timothy 2:15), Paul's epistles (Romans-Philemon) provide the doctrine for believers today, distinct from Israel's kingdom program.
Note about HYPER DISPENSATIONALISTS
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/01/let-us-examine-ourselves-gospel-kjv.html
If you're exploring from a dispensational lens, this holds; other views (e.g., amillennial) see less distinction and no pretrib rapture. For deeper study, start with Ephesians 3 and Romans 11 in context.
Your Paul teaching is the same as your Red Heifer Video.
I went through your 1 hr 5 min Red Heifer video which I have prepared a detailed rebuttal and rebuke.
https://x.com/EscanorReloaded/status/1959182848851624011
You misquote from your corrupted bible manuscript LXX and your severe misunderstanding in use of your Paul study claiming Paul "inverted the prophets, exalted celibacy, told you to bow to tyrants, branded the gospel as his." Whereby you've laid it all out verse by verse on Substack.
I've gone through your Substack in detail and respond below:
To summarize:
There is nothing new under the sun. SIR Escano you have been bitten by the same serpent that bit Eve in the garden.
You need the Antivenom as in Exodus with the Bronze Serpent- YOU NEED JESUS CHRIST.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/08/jesus-christ-antivenom-christian.html
The Serpent said to Eve “
3 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Please see this powerful study by Brother Cameron Moshfegh on this.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/07/the-study-of-scripture-for-doctrine-and_31.html
Please read my study on IF YOU DENY PAUL you are denying Jesus Christ. The reason you teach these blasphemous things against Paul is because he was given the MYSTERY which gives us:
What most do not understand is that the MYSTERY revealed to Paul by Jesus Christ is 3 parts: 1. The Gospel of Grace which most do not understand, 2. The Church is Israel - who also include the Old Testament Saints, The Jewish Remnant and Tribulation Saints saved during the Tribulation. 3. The PreTribulation Rapture.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/09/to-deny-pauls-gospel-is-to-deny-jesus.html
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2024/02/the-church-of-laodicea-does-not-know.html
Sir Escano is an extremely evil reprobate proclaiming BLASPHEMY. He is also extremely ignorant and running around in his bible study tools is like a small child playing with a loaded AK47.
I listened to his entire 1 hour 5 minute painful insanity. About half of what he spouted is what I heard him blabber on a SPACE I was in when he came in out of nowhere and started a stream of F Bombs and attacked me and the KING JAMES BIBLE and the Red Heifer. I listened to him rant for over 20 minutes straight about how he understood scripture because of the GREEK. He read excerpts from this video you shared with me.
The literal RED HEIFER triggers ESCANO like wildfire.
Here is the Blog I did on your RED HEIFER SPACE and why I was so involved in that space with you.
Why the RED HEIFER matters:
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/08/red-heifer-update-and-why-it-matters-to.html
When it was my turn to speak he left. I blasted him out of the water the same way I did by God’s Grace that Jan who proclaims to know the MYSTERY but leaves out the 3rd pillar of the MYSTERY. Side note I have that study if you’re interested which I explain further in the RAPTURE of the Church is serious business.
I could go through every minute and refute ESCANO in over 20 major points.
The thing that upset me the most was his INSANE BLASPHEMOUS attack on the ANOINTED. THIS IS TELLS ME HE IS POSSESSED LITERALLY HE HATES JESUS CHRIST BUT WILL NEVER EVER SAY THIS. I explain his warped demonic anointed teaching later in these notes below.
To ESCANO’s credit he definitely understands the EVIL of the Kabbalah and the Jewish Mystics and of course the HEBREW ROOTS MOVEMENT. But after this the wheels fall off his insanity. See note below of an entire Grox review of his post. For example I fully agree with him in that
Escano claims the red heifer ritual (based on Numbers 19) and the Third Temple movement are not biblical but part of a Jewish conspiracy to usher in the Antichrist and a one-world religion. He asserts that Christians supporting this are deceived, as Jesus’ sacrifice fulfilled and replaced Old Testament rituals (Hebrews 10:10-12).
Hidden however is that the entire attack of Escano is against the King James Bible and the Hebrew Manuscripts, the Masoretic Manuscripts of course and bases his entire teaching on the superiority of the Greek Language and the Septuagint LXX. It’s strange that he seems to be confused by the 70 Hebrew scribes who wrote the Septuagint LXX = 70. I have to listen to that again. But there’s no number of scribes that wrote the Masoretic manuscripts.
Ultimately Escano is a closet JUDAIZER himself and hates Jesus Christ. This is most clear in his most perverse teaching and mistranslation of anointed. I want to make this very clear, the manner he describes his use of bible study tools like a lexicon is a very disturbing shell game. Example he goes through a word for anointed and takes another meaning using Greek and has the listener actually believing that anointed means to place drugs in the eye.
Worst is he is accursed because as recently seen in his ANTI PAUL X post and Substack
Escano denies Paul and Paul warns that anyone who denies his gospel is accursed Galatians 1:8,9 KJV and Peter warns in 2 Peter 3:16 KJV that to deny Paul’s Epistles are to their own destruction.
As I clearly state in my MYSTERY STUDY The Laodicean Church does not understand the MYSTERY - The Mystery is 3 parts:
Paul's gospel, revealed progressively after Israel's rejection of the Messiah (Acts 7; Romans 11:25). It's a "dispensation of the grace of God" (Ephesians 3:2) for the Church age, hidden until Paul but now the basis for salvation today. The "etc." in your question likely includes related truths like the indwelling Christ (Colossians 1:26-27) and the Church's heavenly destiny (Ephesians 1:3). To rightly divide the word (2 Timothy 2:15), Paul's epistles (Romans-Philemon) provide the doctrine for believers today, distinct from Israel's kingdom program. If you're exploring from a dispensational lens, this holds; other views (e.g., amillennial) see less distinction and no pretrib rapture. For deeper study, start with Ephesians 3 and Romans 11 in context.
This reveals ESCANO as a crafty JUDAIZER who hates the MYSTERY and must put up the WALL between the JEWS - ISRAEL and the CHURCH.
Outrageous points that are BLASPHEMOUS and HERETICAL Escano says at time 51: “that Anointed in the Bible means: Rubbing drugs into the eye.”
The truth is Anointed means: One anoint(v.)
mid-14c., enointen, "pour oil upon, smear with ointment," from Old French enoint "smeared on," past participle of enoindre "smear on," from Latin inunguere "to anoint," from in- "in, into" (see in) + unguere "to smear" (see unguent (n.)).
"the Anointed," synonymous with and translating to Greek Hebrew mashiah (see messiah), a title given to Jesus of Nazareth; Old English crist (by 830, perhaps 675), from Latin Christus, from Greek khristos "the anointed," noun use of verbal adjective of khriein "to rub, anoint" (from PIE root *ghrei- "to rub").
I could go into the verb function of MESSIAH but for now let’s look at this from Bible Study point of view.
We find anointed first mention of Anointed:
In the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, the Hebrew words H4886 (מָשַׁח, mashach, a verb meaning "to anoint") and H4899 (מָשִׁיחַ, mashiach, a noun meaning "anointed" or "Messiah") are relevant to the term "anointed." Since you mentioned H4889 but likely intended H4899 (as H4889, mishchah, refers to "destruction" or "corruption" and is unrelated to anointing), I’ll focus on H4886 and H4899 and identify their first mentions in the KJV.
First Mention of H4886 (מָשַׁח, mashach)
The verb H4886, meaning "to anoint" or "smear with oil," first appears in Genesis 31:13:
KJV Text: "I am the God of Bethel, where thou anointedst the pillar, and where thou vowedst a vow unto me: now arise, get thee out from this land, and return unto the land of thy kindred."
Context: Jacob anointed a pillar at Bethel as a memorial to God’s revelation. The Hebrew verb here is mashachta (from H4886), marking a physical act of consecration.
First Mention of H4899 (מָשִׁיחַ, mashiach)
The noun H4899, meaning "anointed" or "anointed one," first appears in Leviticus 4:3:
KJV Text: "If the priest that is anointed do sin according to the sin of the people; then let him bring for his sin, which he hath sinned, a young bullock without blemish unto the LORD for a sin offering."
Context: This refers to the high priest, described as "the anointed priest" (hakohen hammashiach), signifying his consecrated role through anointing with oil.
Now let’s examine H4899 in the Ancient Hebrew Lexicon: AHL Benner: 2357:
Ointment made from OILS that are smeared with oil to signify AUTHORITY PRIEST KING the anointed one KJV - MESSIAH.
The Greek term Μεσσίας (Messias), corresponding to Strong's G3323, is a transliteration of the Hebrew מָשִׁיחַ (mashiach, "anointed one" or "Messiah"). In the King James Version (KJV) of the New Testament, G3323 appears only twice, and its first mention is in John 1:41:
KJV Text: "He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ."
Context: Andrew, after encountering Jesus, declares to Simon (Peter) that he has found the Messias, explicitly equating it with Christos (Christ, the anointed one). This verse underscores the Jewish expectation of a promised deliverer, fulfilled in Jesus according to Christian theology.
Comparing CONTEXT and HARMONIZING SCRIPTURE:
each time anointed is used we see it in The Greek term Μεσσίας (Messias), corresponding to Strong's G3323, is a transliteration of the Hebrew מָשִׁיחַ (mashiach, "anointed one" or "Messiah"). In the King James Version (KJV) of the New Testament, G3323 appears only twice, and its first mention is in John 1:41:
KJV Text: "He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ."
Context: Andrew, after encountering Jesus, declares to Simon (Peter) that he has found the Messias, explicitly equating it with Christos (Christ, the anointed one). This verse underscores the Jewish expectation of a promised deliverer, fulfilled in Jesus according to Christian theology.
The second occurrence is in John 4:25, but John 1:41 is the earliest mention in the KJV. If you
Occurrences of G3323 (Μεσσίας, "Messias") in the New Testament (KJV)
Strong's G3323 appears only twice in the New Testament, both in the Gospel of John. Below, I compare the verses, their contexts, and their relation to Jesus Christ.
John 1:41:
KJV Text: "He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ."
Context: Andrew, after meeting Jesus (John 1:38-40), excitedly tells his brother Simon (Peter) that they have discovered the "Messias." The verse explicitly equates "Messias" with "Christ" (Χριστός, G5547), identifying Jesus as the anointed one prophesied in the Old Testament (e.g., Daniel 9:25-26).
Relation to Jesus: Direct—Andrew is referring to Jesus as the fulfillment of the messianic promise.
John 4:25:
KJV Text: "The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things."
Context: During Jesus' conversation with the Samaritan woman at the well, she expresses her belief in the coming Messiah. Jesus responds in verse 26: "I that speak unto thee am he," confirming his identity.
Relation to Jesus: Direct—the woman anticipates the Messiah, and Jesus immediately claims the title, linking it to himself.
Sir Escano’s claim that the “Perseus Lexicon” is the best tool for Bible scholars is a blatant lie, exposing his perverse teachings and ignorance of lexicography. Perseus is a digital library, not a lexicon, hosting Liddell-Scott-Jones (LSJ) alongside non-biblical Greek texts that fuel Escano’s philosophical tangents, straying from scripture. True scholars rely on LSJ or Benner’s Ancient Hebrew Lexicon for precise definitions like mashiach (H4899) or Μεσσίας (G3323). His blasphemous “anointed” drug claim and anti-Paul rants, denying the apostle’s gospel (Galatians 1:12), preach another gospel under Galatians 1:8-9 KJV’s curse. Escano falls into the destruction Peter warned of (2 Peter 3:16 KJV), rejecting Paul’s Acts 15 validation. His red heifer conspiracy further distorts God’s Word. Repent, Escano, or face judgment for your heretical deceptions!
“I am a Pharisee, descended from Pharisees.” — Acts 23:6
“Not was.
Am.
Branded till the end> “
SIR ESCANO your opening remarks display your distorted knowledge of scholarship. Claiming to be a Pharisee IN CONTEXT means he identifies himself as an expert in the LAW TORAH . This is the same as a Phd in Theology entering into a discussion announcing his credentials. Look this up, do not take my word for it.
Hopium Slayer🔥
A scorched-earth publication exposing psyops, parasites, and false saviors. No hopium. No survivors. You’re not ready
- Hopium (from the query): Combines "hope" and "opium" to describe addictive false hope.
- Smog: Smoke + fog.
- Brunch: Breakfast + lunch.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/04/christs-sincere-milk-brings-no-guile-ac.html
What do you really think of Paul the apostle, or should I say Paul the apologist? Here’s a mini-thread. Mostly scripture, all logic.
Don’t come at me with feelings, come with verses and TRUTH
If I’m wrong, show me where. If you can. I’d love for my logic to be flawed and to have open, straight conversation. Not butthurt baby BS
1.
The Jews aren’t ignorant of God’s law.
They know judgment, they just serve another father. 👹
The Talmud is their scripture of subversion.
For 2,000 years their mission has been the same: invert the gospel and all thing natural and of God
Agreed.
2.
Enter Saul of Tarsus.
Pharisee of Pharisees. Christian killer.
Agreed
And even after his “conversion”?
“I am a Pharisee, descended from Pharisees.” — Acts 23:6
Not was.
Am.
Branded till the end.
Already responded above. This is easily refuted as a Phd would introduce his credentials as a scholar. Research this for yourself.
3 Versions of Paul’s “Conversion”
1. Acts 9:3–9
Paul is blinded by a light, hears Jesus, and men with him hear the voice but “see no one.”
He’s led by hand into Damascus.
2. Acts 22:6–11
Same story retold. But now, the men with him see the light but “do not hear the voice.”
Total inversion of the first account.
NO this is not an inversion. Anytime someone gives an account the point of view changes. What Escano fails to do is to look at ALL scripture whereby PAUL was validated by the COUNCIL OF JERUSALEM and later Peter makes it clear in 2 Peter 3;16 KJV that IF we deny or resist which the unstable UNSTABLE and UNLEARNED souls like Escano do is to their own DESTRUCTION.
3. Acts 26:12–18
Another retelling before Agrippa. Here Paul says everyone fell to the ground and he alone heard the voice.
Jesus supposedly commissions him right there, no Ananias needed.
The Problems
Contradiction: Did his companions hear the voice or not? Did they fall or stand?
Contradiction: Did he get his orders from Jesus directly, or through Ananias later?
Contradiction: Was the light only for Paul, or for all?
A true prophet’s testimony is consistent.
But Paul’s “conversion” grows, mutates, adapts to audience. Before Jews he leans on Ananias, before Gentiles he claims a direct commission, before kings he makes it cosmic.
Escano does not understand 1 Corinthians 9:20-23 KJV Paul explains why he adapts to the audience.
3.
First Inversion: Obedience to Tyrants
Paul: “Let everyone be subject to governing authorities…” (Rom. 13)
But the prophets?
Daniel 3: Refused the king’s idol.
Exodus 1: Midwives defied Pharaoh.
Acts 5: “We must obey God, not men.”
Escano leaves out the first rule of solid Hermeneutics of Comparing Scripture with scripture. Escano fails to fully describe Romans 13 and harmonize this with Acts 15 and the other major scriptures of Acts 16:37; 22:25 KJV). Daniel/Exodus resisted idolatry, not all rule (Romans 13:7 KJV honors just rulers). Escano inverts grace into anarchy, hating the Mystery's Church-age doctrine (your study: distinct from Israel's kingdom).
Paul says kneel.
PAUL DOES NOT SAY KNEEL. Escano offers no scripture.
Prophets said resist.
4.
Second Inversion: Celibacy exalted
Paul: “It is good… to stay unmarried.” (1 Cor. 7)
But God: “It is not good for man to be alone.” (Gen. 2:18)
Proverbs: “He who finds a wife finds a good thing.” (Prov. 18:22)
Paul calls singleness a gift.
Genesis calls it a curse.
ESCANO takes this out of context. See commentary.
5.
Third Inversion: “My Gospel”
Paul: “As my gospel declares…” (Rom. 2:16)
Paul: “In accordance with my gospel…” (Rom. 16:25)
Christ: “My teaching is not mine, but His who sent me.” (John 7:16)
Prophets: “The word of the Lord came to me.”
Paul: “My gospel.”
Escano does not understand THE MYSTERY and why Jesus Christ gave Paul the Gospel of THE MYSTERY.
The King James Version (KJV) does not contain a single verse where Jesus explicitly gives Paul the "gospel of the mystery" in a direct narrative like the Gospel accounts. Instead, Paul’s revelation of the Mystery is described in his epistles as a divine revelation from Jesus Christ after His ascension, distinct from the teachings given during His earthly ministry. The Mystery, as outlined in your prior message, refers to the dispensation of grace for the Church Age, revealed progressively after Israel's rejection of the Messiah (Acts 7; Romans 11:25 KJV), encompassing salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), the indwelling Christ (Colossians 1:26-27), and the Church's heavenly destiny (Ephesians 1:3). Below are the key KJV passages where Paul describes receiving this gospel and the Mystery directly from Jesus Christ through revelation, fulfilling your request.
Key KJV Passages on Paul Receiving the Gospel of the Mystery
Galatians 1:11-12 (KJV)
"But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ."
Context: Paul emphasizes that his gospel, including the Mystery, was not learned from human sources (e.g., the other apostles) but directly revealed by Jesus Christ. This supports your Mystery study, showing the gospel’s divine origin post-conversion (Acts 9).Ephesians 3:1-5 (KJV)
"For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit."
Context: Paul explicitly states that Jesus revealed the Mystery to him, a truth hidden in past ages but now disclosed for the Gentiles. This aligns with your study’s emphasis on the "dispensation of the grace of God" (Ephesians 3:2) as distinct from Israel’s kingdom program.Colossians 1:25-27 (KJV)
"Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God; Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints: To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory."
Context: Paul describes his role as minister of the Mystery, received from God, focusing on "Christ in you" (indwelling Christ), a key component of the Church Age doctrine you highlight.Acts 26:15-18 (KJV)
"And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me."
Context: During Paul’s retelling of his Damascus road encounter before Agrippa, Jesus commissions him to preach to the Gentiles, laying the foundation for the gospel of grace (part of the Mystery). This shows Jesus directly assigning Paul his role, though the full Mystery unfolds later (Ephesians 3).Romans 16:25-26 (KJV)
"Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith."
Context: Paul ties his gospel to the Mystery, revealed by Jesus Christ’s command, hidden until the Church Age. This supports your study’s point about progressive revelation after Israel’s rejection.
Harmonizing with Your Mystery Study
These verses collectively demonstrate that Paul received the gospel of the Mystery through divine revelation from Jesus Christ, not during Jesus’ earthly ministry but post-ascension, primarily starting with his conversion (Acts 9) and elaborated through further revelations (Galatians 1:15-16; Ephesians 3:3). Your Mystery study emphasizes three parts:
Paul’s gospel: Salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 1:11-12).
Indwelling Christ: The hope of glory (Colossians 1:27).
Church’s heavenly destiny: Spiritual blessings in heavenly places (Ephesians 1:3). These are rooted in Paul’s epistles (Romans-Philemon), which 2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV) instructs to "rightly divide" as distinct from Israel’s earthly kingdom program.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/01/let-us-examine-ourselves-gospel-kjv.html
Escano’s denial of Paul’s apostleship, as you noted, is accursed (Galatians 1:8-9) and destructive (2 Peter 3:16), as it rejects this revealed Mystery.
Why No Single Verse?
The absence of one verse showing Jesus handing Paul the Mystery in a conversational format (like John 3) reflects the nature of Paul’s post-ascension revelations, delivered through visions and direct impartation (2 Corinthians 12:1-4 KJV: "I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord"). The above passages, especially Galatians 1:11-12 and Ephesians 3:3, are the clearest KJV statements of Jesus revealing the Mystery to Paul, aligning with your dispensational framework.
6.
Side-by-Side (the mask slips):
Paul: “I am a Pharisee.”
Jeremiah: “The priests did not know Me.”
Paul: “Be subject to authorities.”
Daniel: “We will not serve your gods.”
Paul: “Stay unmarried.”
Genesis: “It is not good to be alone.”
Paul: “My gospel.”
Christ: “My teaching is not mine.”
See Notes KING JAMES SCRIPTURE REFUTING THIS LIE.
7.
Do you see it?
Paul is the inversion.
The apostle who flips Moses, the prophets, and Christ upside down.
Not God’s vessel, the Sanhedrin’s masterpiece.
See Notes KING JAMES SCRIPTURE REFUTING THIS LIE.
8.
Tribulation isn’t fate.
It’s infiltration.
Subversion tolerated = judgment delivered.
See Notes KING JAMES SCRIPTURE REFUTING THIS LIE.
9.
⚠️ Tolerance isn’t love.
Tolerance is poison.
Paul sold it as virtue.
The church swallowed it.
And the world is drunk on it still.
See Notes KING JAMES SCRIPTURE REFUTING THIS LIE.
10.
Paul the Pharisee wasn’t the church’s foundation.
He was the crack in it.
And through that crack, the Beast slithered in.
🔥 END THREAD 🔥
Review and Refutation of Sir Escano's Claims
Sir Escano's arguments, as presented in his X thread and Substack article on Paul the Apostle, along with his distortions of the red heifer ritual and biblical terms like "anointed," represent a direct attack on the authority of Scripture and the Apostle Paul. By denying Paul's gospel and apostleship, Escano falls under the curse outlined in Galatians 1:8-9 (KJV): "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." Furthermore, 2 Peter 3:16 (KJV) warns that twisting Paul's epistles, "as they do also the other scriptures," leads to one's "own destruction." Escano's views align with Judaizing tendencies, which seek to undermine the Mystery revealed to Paul (Ephesians 3:1-9 KJV)—the dispensation of grace for the Church, distinct from Israel's kingdom program (Romans 11:25 KJV; 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV). This Mystery includes Paul's gospel of salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV), the indwelling Christ (Colossians 1:26-27 KJV), and the Church's heavenly destiny (Ephesians 1:3 KJV). As detailed in your Mystery study, denying this erects a false "wall" between Israel and the Church, promoting legalism over grace.
Your blog, "The Great Divide between the KING JAMES BIBLE and the Septuagint LXX," reinforces this by defending the KJV's basis in the preserved Masoretic Text (MT) against corrupted sources like the Septuagint (LXX), which Escano implicitly draws from via Greek lexicons. The blog argues that the LXX, influenced by Alexandrian manuscripts (e.g., Codex Vaticanus and Sinaiticus), introduces philosophical distortions and apocryphal books that support heretical doctrines, citing scholars like Edward F. Hills who prioritize the MT as divinely preserved (Psalm 12:6-7 KJV). Modern critics like Wes Huff are exposed for relying on Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) variants, which your blog views as supplementary at best, not authoritative, confirming the MT's fidelity without replacing it. This ties directly to refuting Escano, as his use of Greek resources (e.g., Perseus) strays from the KJV's Hebrew roots, enabling his inversions.
Below, I refute each point from Escano's X thread and Substack (summarized as inversions/contradictions) using the KJV and your blog/resources. I also address his red heifer distortions and the blasphemous "anointed" claim. Refutations are structured point-by-point for clarity.
Refutation of Red Heifer Distortions
Escano claims the red heifer and Third Temple are Talmudic/Kabbalistic deceptions, anti-Christian, rooted in subversion, with Christians deceived as Jesus fulfilled rituals (Hebrews 10:10-12 KJV). This ignores its biblical basis in Numbers 19:2 (KJV): "Speak unto the children of Israel, that they bring thee a red heifer without spot, wherein is no blemish, and upon which never came yoke." Hebrew "parah adummah" (Strong's H6510/H122) means a red cow/heifer, symbolizing purification—prefiguring Christ's blood (Hebrews 9:13-14 KJV: "For if the blood of bulls... how much more shall the blood of Christ... purge your conscience"). Your Ancient Hebrew Lexicon (p. 225) associates it with "break," "crush," "winepress"—pointing to Christ's sacrifice (Isaiah 53:5 KJV: "he was bruised for our iniquities"). Escano's "deception" claim relies on Greek distortions (e.g., Septuagint), which your blog debunks as losing "nuance and metaphoric power," favoring MT/KJV purity.
Refutation of "Anointed" Claim
Escano's heretical assertion that "anointed" means "rubbing drugs into the eye" twists Scripture. The KJV first uses the verb (H4886, mashach) in Genesis 31:13 (KJV): "where thou anointedst the pillar," for consecration. The noun (H4899, mashiach) in Leviticus 4:3 (KJV): "the priest that is anointed," signifying authority via oil. Greek "Messias" (G3323) in John 1:41 (KJV): "We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ" (from "chriein," to rub/anoint, PIE *ghrei- "to rub"—not drugs). Your Ancient Hebrew Lexicon (Benner, #2357) defines it as "ointment... smeared... to signify authority (priest, king, the anointed one—Messiah)." Both NT occurrences (John 1:41; 4:25 KJV) equate to Christ as deliverer, fulfilled in Jesus. Escano's claim strays via non-biblical sources, like Perseus (which he touts as "the best lexicon"), but as you note, Perseus is not a lexicon—it's a digital library biased toward philosophy/LXX, incorporating LSJ but diluted with extras. True scholars prefer Liddell-Scott (your photo/recommendation), which focuses on precision without corruption (e.g., LSJ revisions add non-biblical noise). Your blog exposes such reliance on corrupted Greek as undermining KJV preservation.
Hey Andrew Theres this guy who has a site known as revelations of Jesus Christ ! Please Critique him . I think he is a danger and preaches His Gospel the Ghetto Gospel!
ReplyDeletePart 1 of 2 :
DeleteBecause of my current workload. I do not have the time to go into a deep research of this guy. However, I used my Blog and had X AI do a Deep Research on "Revelations of Jesus Christ" - Here's what it says. Please see if this is the right guy. Thank you: Quote: Ministry Based on my research, "Revelations of Jesus Christ" refers to Revelations of Jesus Christ Ministries (ROJC), an independent Christian ministry led by Wally Werks (also known as "Wally" or "Pastor Wally"). It operates primarily through a YouTube channel, a website (revelationsofjesuschrist.com), a Spotify podcast, and other platforms. The ministry began as "The Ghetto Gospel" and focuses on personal testimonies, music, and teachings aimed at revealing Jesus Christ. Wally Werks shares his background as someone who has "lived it" (implying a past involving hardship or street life), and he creates original music honoring Jesus while delivering deep, unmonetized content. The ministry emphasizes spiritual truths, historical analyses (e.g., Roman Empire, Papacy, pagan influences like the god Janus or hookah as an "altar of Baal"), and calls for discernment in the "last days."
3 sources
It's not affiliated with mainstream denominations but appears evangelical/charismatic, with content on end-times, saints vs. sinners, and exposing perceived deceptions.Doctrinal Teachings ROJC's teachings center on the following key doctrines, drawn from their website, videos, and shared content:Centrality of Jesus Christ (Yeshua Messiah): Everything revolves around revealing who Jesus is as the "Word who became flesh," the King of Glory, and the source of transformation. They preach His Gospel "without compromise," emphasizing His love, power, and role in salvation.
2 sources
Repentance and Transformation: A strong call to repent from past sins and live a transformed life through Jesus' power. Wally's testimony highlights personal redemption, urging viewers not to be discouraged but to persevere as "saints" despite struggles with sin.
Part 2 of 2: 2 sources
ReplyDeleteEnd-Times Urgency and Discernment: Teachings stress the "last days" with growing darkness, encouraging spiritual vigilance. Content includes messages like "Can You Handle This Truth?" and warnings about abominations (e.g., AI as the "image of the beast" or vaccinations as desolation).
2 sources
Exposing False Teachings and Influences: The ministry rebukes perceived false teachers (e.g., Rick Warren as a "false teacher") and uncovers historical/spiritual deceptions, such as pagan roots in modern practices or the Papacy's ties to Roman gods. It promotes scriptural depth over superficial faith.
2 sources
Salvation and Faith: Salvation is through faith in Jesus' Gospel, but critics accuse Wally of promoting a "false gospel," possibly implying works-based elements or unorthodox views (e.g., mixing personal revelations with scripture). The ministry uses music and studies to uplift, focusing on the Holy Spirit's filling for power.
2 sources
Scripture is emphasized, though specific versions (e.g., KJV) aren't always clarified. The tone is passionate, humble, and Holy Spirit-led, with Wally described as "spirit-filled."Rebuke Using Your Blog: "Let Us Examine Ourselves Gospel KJV"Your blog post on "Let Us Examine Ourselves" (from thethirdheaventraveler.com) provides a powerful framework for rebuking ROJC's teachings, rooted in 2 Corinthians 13:5 (KJV): "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves." It warns against false gospels, apostasy, and corrupted doctrines, insisting on the KJV as the uncorrupted authority from the Textus Receptus, while critiquing modern translations and superficial salvations like the "ABC Equation" or social justice gospels. Using this, here's a rebuke of ROJC:ROJC's emphasis on personal revelations and historical exposes, while passionate, risks straying from sound KJV doctrine into speculative territory—much like the "seducing spirits" your blog warns about in 2 Timothy 4:2-4. Wally's teachings on pagan influences (e.g., hookah as Baal's altar or AI as the beast) may add unscriptural layers, potentially leading followers into "another gospel" rather than the pure, faith-alone salvation your post defends. Examine ROJC: Does it root every claim in KJV proofs, like the Bereans (Acts 17:11), or rely on Wally's experiences? Your blog cautions against apostate sources; if ROJC uses non-KJV texts or mixes revelations with scripture, it opens doors to deception, omitting key doctrines like Christ's deity or atonement as seen in corrupted manuscripts.True faith demands self-examination: ROJC followers must "prove" if Christ is in them, not through music or exposes, but by KJV adherence and working out salvation (Philippians 2:12). Your warnings about modern seminaries and AI apply—ROJC's unmonetized, independent style might seem pure, but without KJV primacy, it's lukewarm Laodicean apostasy. Repent and return to sound doctrine, lest you hear "I never knew you" (Matthew 7:23). Research KJV superiority, as your blog urges, to escape false teachings