The Dialectic of the Jewish Question & Zionism - 2 Sides of the same coin
JQ - say, " It's the JEWS.." who are the problem.
ZIONISTS - say, "It's the TRUE JEWS and true Christians who understand the Mystery of the Church..." who are the problem.
JQ is the opposite side of the same coin as the Zionists - The Dialectic: Here's an excerpt from Blog I'm finalizing:
A quote taken from Historian @History__Speaks
Historical Evidence of Zionist Opposition to "True Jews"
A hallmark example of how Zionists have historically opposed "true Jews"—defined here as Torah-observant, anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews like those aligned with Neturei Karta—comes from archival documents during the Holocaust (1943-1944). As revealed in a recent X post by historian Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill (@History__Speaks), the Ben-Gurion-led Jewish Agency blocked a British rescue scheme for over 1,000 ultra-Orthodox rabbis and their families from Nazi-occupied Europe because they were perceived as anti-Zionist. The scheme involved issuing Palestine visas to secure Turkish transit visas, potentially stalling deportations. However, the Jewish Agency exercised veto power over visa allocations, prioritizing Zionist contributors over religious Jews.
Key quotes from the British document highlight this animosity: "The reason why the Rabbis cannot be brought out under any of the schemes of 'the Jewish Agency' is that they are not 'persons of vise' for Palestine. Those in control of the Jewish Agency are not at the present sympathetic to religion. ... Some of the Rabbis are no doubt not Zionists.
This was one of the main reasons for the inauguration of this 'ultra-orthodox' scheme." This unsympathetic stance toward religious Jews—often anti-Zionist—led to delays, switching to Mauritius visas, and potential lives lost. The post notes the Agency allocated visas to Jews in safe countries who could "contribute to the Zionist project," even as White Paper quotas went unexhausted, underscoring a deliberate deprioritization of "true Jews" who rejected secular nationalism. This historical subversion aligns with the Judaizer spirit, conflating political power with divine covenants and erecting walls against faithful Torah adherents." End quote.
Mystics, Gnostics, Secret Societies and all Kabbalah adherents (Jewish esoteric cults) fail to grasp Paul's mystery, which dismantles partitions. Paul's revelation in Ephesians 2:11-22 KJV and 3:1-6 KJV unveils the "mystery of Christ": Gentiles as fellow heirs in one body through the Gospel, where Christ "hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man" (Ephesians 2:14-15 KJV).
This unity is by faith, not secret knowledge (gnosis) or mystical rites. Gnostics, emphasizing hidden wisdom and dualism (e.g., matter vs. spirit), maintain hierarchies and separations Paul abolishes, viewing salvation as elite enlightenment rather than accessible grace. Kabbalah, with its sefirot and emanations, imposes esoteric layers on Torah, veiling the simplicity of Paul's Gospel and preserving Jewish-Gentile divides through ritualistic mysticism.
As in the blog "The word 'Israel' has been hijacked by Satan and his systems," true Israel is spiritual—believers grafted in via Christ's work (Romans 11 KJV; Galatians 3:29 KJV)—not physical or esoteric. These groups hijack "Israel" by esotericizing it, ignoring the allegory in Galatians 4:22-31 KJV: Hagar (bondage, earthly Jerusalem) vs. Sarah (freedom, heavenly Jerusalem), where "we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise" (v. 28), casting out fleshly heirs. Romans 9:7 KJV: "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." Their failure perpetuates Satanic hijacking via Zionism, conflating identities and subverting Christianity's unity.
These Christians who are anti dispensational anti-premillennial believers are actually no different than the Zionists they call out who are just as confused.
Paul of the Bible was way before Darby and he clearly laid all this out way way before Darby. This highlights how opposition to Dispensationalism often mirrors the very conflations it critiques, ignoring Paul's pre-Darby revelations in Ephesians and Romans that delineate the Church's mystery apart from Israel. The enemy that picked up in the 1900s to drive in confusion was Scofield as he wrote damnable heresy in his ‘commentary’ to corrupt the King James Bible. Scofield's notes, while popularizing Dispensationalism, introduced errors like marginalizing the Church's distinct role or blending covenants, sowing confusion that anti-Dispensationalists exploit to attack the framework, much like Zionists hijack Israel's identity—both subverting Paul's clear distinctions and perpetuating walls between true spiritual heirs and fleshly claims.
Here's background to what we're looking at:
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/11/husbandman-householder-saints-iron-rod.html
Comments
Post a Comment