Exposing another Apostate fake Pastor who defends Russell Brand
Titus 1:13
“This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;”
King James Version (KJV)
My video and associated blog study exposing Russell Brand
Comment from a Pastor:
@ThatGaijinFella • 1 day ago
I get what you're trying to do here, but Russell is still new and growing in his faith, as are many of us. People slip, and that's okay. God knows we will and He also knows our flaws. But Russell Brand is definitely not 'sad'. You say you're not judging his heart, but a minute later you do that with "...I seriously doubt he's saved." Your doubts are of no concern to God - the relationship is between Him and Russell Brand. His (RB's) character is whacky for sure, and it's not something most non-brits can understand so easily. We're dry, witty and sarcastic. It's British nature!
My Response:
@ThatGaijinFella Appreciate your comments. There are layers I wouldn't want you to try to understand but let's say this. I never said, I KNOW he's not saved but rather i seriously doubt it. Since English is your first language I won't waste my time explaining the difference. I do actually understand a great deal of British humor and their sense of humor. I have spent lots of time with Brits in my Naval service actually and while living overseas and working with them. Please take a moment to study this study I did about how we are to call out those who use a large platform to mislead others.
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/07/how-to-deal-with-dispute-among-brethren.html
His response was a lecture about me not taking time to examine myself and to not judge others by quoting Matthew 7, 1 John 4 and 1 Samuel 16. He obviously had not read my link I sent him. But instead of understanding how he was defending a reprobate NEW AGE teacher like Russell Brand, he attacks me for calling out Russell Brand.
My response:
@ThatGaijinFella WOW .... ARE YOU SERIOUS?
I already sent you the biblical doctrine on How to Deal with a Dispute Among Brethren —
https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2025/07/how-to-deal-with-dispute-among-brethren.html —
yet you completely ignored it and doubled down with your apostate Jesuit seminary garbage. You have now become my new poster boy for pastors trained in those corrupted seminaries who spew philosophical doctrine instead of the pure Word of God (KJB).
Smashing Pastors and Theologians Phds are my favorite.
I honestly love exposing you guys the best, and you just volunteered as the latest case study. Let’s go straight to the Scriptures you misapplied so badly: You leaned hard on Matthew 7:1-5 (“Judge not...”) while conveniently skipping the full counsel. And of course way out of CONTEXT without regard to the required full hermeneutics of what I teach as the 3 steps of CONTEXT, EXEGESIS, HARMONIZING SCRIPTURES.
This is NOT an interpersonal private offense between you and me. This is NOT a “doubtful disputation” (Romans 14:1). This falls squarely into Case #3 — I CLEARLY POINT OUT IN MY BLOG WHICH YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO READ.... WHICH IS: Public Disputation: when a brother uses a public platform.
Precisely what Russell was doing and now what you're doing here now defending Russell and mislead others on doctrine and discernment.
The correct biblical response is public rebuke, exactly as Paul did to Peter in Galatians 2:11-14 (rebuked “before them all”) and as commanded in 1 Timothy 5:20 — “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.”
You actually prop up Russell Brand his latest video, and warn people against my “personal takes.
That is textbook public misleading. Many are being deceived by Brand’s celebrity “testimony” while he still promotes New Age, occult, and works-based garbage.
What in the HELL is wrong with you? Do you have any idea of what you're doing here? No you do not but are as Russell the blind leading the blind. This is why you and your kind must be rebuked sharply in public. How dare you correct me.
God’s people need to see the fruit (Matthew 7:16 — the verse right after the one you cherry-picked) and test the spirits (1 John 4:1). You’re using 1 Samuel 16:7 (“man looks on the outward appearance”) to shut down discernment, when the whole point of public rebuke is to protect the Body from exactly that kind of smooth-talking deception.
You say “the Bible pushes us to be careful” and “focus more on our own walk.” That is the classic modern pastor cop-out taught in apostate seminaries. The same Bible commands us to mark and avoid (Romans 16:17), rebuke sharply (Titus 1:13), and contend for the faith (Jude 3). You’re not being “humble” — you’re being disobedient and leading others into the same error. That same sickening Pharisee stuff.
I have now fulfilled the third case of public correction. I will not waste further time on your philosophical ramblings that are “not after Christ” (Colossians 2:8).
Any further comments from you will be deleted and you will be blocked so the pure Word of God can stand without your seminary-trained interference. Study the blog post I sent you — especially the three clear cases — before you ever again try to correct someone who is actually standing on the Word instead of man’s traditions.
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, not your British humor experience or your 2001 ordination papers.
To the brethren reading this: This is exactly why I do these case studies. Wake up and test everything by the KJB alone.
— this entire exchange is now permanently documented as another biblical case study of how to deal with public doctrinal error. I have copied the entire exchange as an eternal witness and testimony. REPENT!
His final response (less 3 others with ridiculous rants about what a false teacher I am etc.) before I blocked and removed his comments.
@ThatGaijinFella •@ThirdHeavenTraveler
first of all, I'm not even going to bother reading all that tripe. I actually WAS going to until you referred to me as your "poster boy". At that point I realised how utterly ignorant and narcissistic you are and on a one man journey to disagree with as many clergy as possible! That's evident in your own words! Had you bothered reading my previous comment correctly, you'd know fine well that I actually DID read your blog from that link. What I found was some good points but mostly one man's opinion! (as I clearly said). You want to be right so badly, I can smell desperation from here!
Good luck going up against the church, clergy, PhD's etc, and whoever else you feel the urge to go against.
This could have been a great discussion, as you leave a little bit of room for questions, but sadly, no. You chose insults, immediately negating your self-proclaimed status of expert on the matter. You also assumed way too much about me, which I assume (ironic huh) you do with everyone. You're an excellent writer, that I can't fault, but it would be nice if you could be more open to discussion of your scribblings, instead of immediately going on a one-man-rampage against centuries of doctrine and anyone who dares to disagree with you or have their own opinion on the matter at hand!
Comments
Post a Comment