Reproving Bible Berean 1611. Jesus Christ is NOT God the Son but rather The Son of God. Amen!
The above video Bible Berean 1611 tells us the Jesus Christ is God the Son.
This is not biblical. Here are my comments:
Brother, I come in the love and peace of the Lord Jesus Christ. I pray my words be received in and with that same grace which by we are saved. I honestly do not care to get into a debate with you and others. I only am making this statement as a testimony and a witness, leaving you and others of your belief to stand before Matthew 10:14. For several days I have been spiritually stirred by the error you are teaching here. Because I disagree with you, I ask you not turn a deaf ear or worse to throw me into Bryan Denlinger's camp. I strongly oppose Bryan Denlinger as a false teacher, a wolf preaching a different gospel of a works based salvation, etc, and heretic as well as a rabid racist. Even Denlinger’s Godhead teaching is in error as he makes outrageous statements like The 3 parts of God all come back together after the Rapture and that Jesus Christ is actually God the Father which is wicked heresy no doubt...Too much to mention here about Brian but for a complete study on the wicked Bryan Denlinger please read:
Back on point and my purpose: This title you bring in error here is: Jesus Christ is God the Son. Any bible believing born again Christian should cringe at these words. My KJV Bible clearly says: "Jesus Christ is the Son of God". I'm a licensed teacher in both English and a foreign language. I've been studying the KJV Bible for many years and a born again Christian. Both the semantic and syntax structure of these two statements (The Son of God and God The Son) - being so completely diametrically opposed on so many levels. - anyone can see we are looking at 2 completely different persons. But worse again, this is not found anywhere in scripture. The scriptures you use throughout your entire video do not or could not support the Bible meaning of Godhead in any sense of proper hermeneutics much less harmonizing scripture with scripture. You're honestly using words that are frankly heretical. Your scriptures strongly support the Godhead and I use the same to prove Godhead is Biblical and Trinity and Modalism are Pagan.
I’m deeply troubled by you making this statement which is making God out to be a polytheistic pagan god which is completely opposite of what is clearly written in scripture in that there is only 1 God and Jesus Christ is the image of the invisible God... (Colossians 1:15... Please see my comments on Colossians below) My KJV Bible tells me that Jesus is the son of God (multiple scriptures). Not God the Son. (Nowhere written in the KJV Bible).
I have struggled over the past year with your heretical Trinity teaching as well as Edward Pfenniger and my dear brother Philip in Australia for over a year now. There are many instances where there’s a simple misunderstanding and frankly a confusion with semantics. I've written many posts to Philip on this and also to Ed before he verbally blasted me and called me another Denlinger. Aside from Edward saying the Waldenses believed and taught the Trinity which is not true and I sent my research which he never read by his comments, I can handle most of your unsound logic, misunderstood scripture, etc as well as the others trying to use gnostic means to define how God could be 1 but also 3. But in the end you all end up making God to be 3 separate persons that are one which is completely illogical and frankly unscriptural and pagan.
See my Blog below:
Please carefully read and pray over this:
The book of Colossians is a Prison Epistle Paul wrote under incredible spiritual pain as he saw the Colossians struggling with the problem of the false teaching of a Judaic-Gnostic heresy that sought to mix Greek philosophy with Christian theology. Gnostic philosophy basically teaches a “new knowledge of twisted man's philosophy to define God” and a corresponding label. The new new philosophy mixed with what the Colossians knew as truth was there being a hierarchy of lesser gods named: “Jehovah God of the Hebrews”. You're making a hierarchy of gods whether you admit it or not. It's not my purpose to get you to change your mind or heart. Only God can do that. It's my job to reprove you in love here. 2 Timothy 4:2-4, Titus 1:11...
You are unwittingly bringing in Gnostic heresy by mislabeling to match your flawed doctrine that is contrary to scripture. The problem with your new knowledge and corresponding label is God is: God The Son. This is found nowhere in scripture. The Bible says: “The Son of God” When we change the words we are going from 1 God to a polytheistic god. Your teaching is straight from the Vatican council and is frankly pagan. All scripture you used Acts 20:28, Ephesians 1:7, Colossians 1:14, (why didn't you use Colossians 1:15 and Colossians 2:9?, John 3:16,17, 1 Timothy 3:16, Hebrews 10, etc...etc. etc. only support the Godhead but not the pagan Trinity. Especially your use of 1 Timothy 3:16 and Micah 5:2 and Hebrews 10:9,10 support the Godhead and not the Trinity. Clearly. Please I watched your video. Please read my Blog on Godhead is Biblical. Trinity and Modalism are pagan doctrine to understand where you're in error. For example in the 3 videos Trinity makes God polytheistic uses most of your scriptures you use trying to prove Trinity...
BLOGs:
Brother, I come in the love and peace of the Lord Jesus Christ. I pray my words be received in and with that same grace which by we are saved. I honestly do not care to get into a debate with you and others. I only am making this statement as a testimony and a witness, leaving you and others of your belief to stand before Matthew 10:14. For several days I have been spiritually stirred by the error you are teaching here. Because I disagree with you, I ask you not turn a deaf ear or worse to throw me into Bryan Denlinger's camp. I strongly oppose Bryan Denlinger as a false teacher, a wolf preaching a different gospel of a works based salvation, etc, and heretic as well as a rabid racist. Even Denlinger’s Godhead teaching is in error as he makes outrageous statements like The 3 parts of God all come back together after the Rapture and that Jesus Christ is actually God the Father which is wicked heresy no doubt...Too much to mention here about Brian but for a complete study on the wicked Bryan Denlinger please read:
Back on point and my purpose: This title you bring in error here is: Jesus Christ is God the Son. Any bible believing born again Christian should cringe at these words. My KJV Bible clearly says: "Jesus Christ is the Son of God". I'm a licensed teacher in both English and a foreign language. I've been studying the KJV Bible for many years and a born again Christian. Both the semantic and syntax structure of these two statements (The Son of God and God The Son) - being so completely diametrically opposed on so many levels. - anyone can see we are looking at 2 completely different persons. But worse again, this is not found anywhere in scripture. The scriptures you use throughout your entire video do not or could not support the Bible meaning of Godhead in any sense of proper hermeneutics much less harmonizing scripture with scripture. You're honestly using words that are frankly heretical. Your scriptures strongly support the Godhead and I use the same to prove Godhead is Biblical and Trinity and Modalism are Pagan.
I’m deeply troubled by you making this statement which is making God out to be a polytheistic pagan god which is completely opposite of what is clearly written in scripture in that there is only 1 God and Jesus Christ is the image of the invisible God... (Colossians 1:15... Please see my comments on Colossians below) My KJV Bible tells me that Jesus is the son of God (multiple scriptures). Not God the Son. (Nowhere written in the KJV Bible).
I have struggled over the past year with your heretical Trinity teaching as well as Edward Pfenniger and my dear brother Philip in Australia for over a year now. There are many instances where there’s a simple misunderstanding and frankly a confusion with semantics. I've written many posts to Philip on this and also to Ed before he verbally blasted me and called me another Denlinger. Aside from Edward saying the Waldenses believed and taught the Trinity which is not true and I sent my research which he never read by his comments, I can handle most of your unsound logic, misunderstood scripture, etc as well as the others trying to use gnostic means to define how God could be 1 but also 3. But in the end you all end up making God to be 3 separate persons that are one which is completely illogical and frankly unscriptural and pagan.
See my Blog below:
Please carefully read and pray over this:
The book of Colossians is a Prison Epistle Paul wrote under incredible spiritual pain as he saw the Colossians struggling with the problem of the false teaching of a Judaic-Gnostic heresy that sought to mix Greek philosophy with Christian theology. Gnostic philosophy basically teaches a “new knowledge of twisted man's philosophy to define God” and a corresponding label. The new new philosophy mixed with what the Colossians knew as truth was there being a hierarchy of lesser gods named: “Jehovah God of the Hebrews”. You're making a hierarchy of gods whether you admit it or not. It's not my purpose to get you to change your mind or heart. Only God can do that. It's my job to reprove you in love here. 2 Timothy 4:2-4, Titus 1:11...
You are unwittingly bringing in Gnostic heresy by mislabeling to match your flawed doctrine that is contrary to scripture. The problem with your new knowledge and corresponding label is God is: God The Son. This is found nowhere in scripture. The Bible says: “The Son of God” When we change the words we are going from 1 God to a polytheistic god. Your teaching is straight from the Vatican council and is frankly pagan. All scripture you used Acts 20:28, Ephesians 1:7, Colossians 1:14, (why didn't you use Colossians 1:15 and Colossians 2:9?, John 3:16,17, 1 Timothy 3:16, Hebrews 10, etc...etc. etc. only support the Godhead but not the pagan Trinity. Especially your use of 1 Timothy 3:16 and Micah 5:2 and Hebrews 10:9,10 support the Godhead and not the Trinity. Clearly. Please I watched your video. Please read my Blog on Godhead is Biblical. Trinity and Modalism are pagan doctrine to understand where you're in error. For example in the 3 videos Trinity makes God polytheistic uses most of your scriptures you use trying to prove Trinity...
BLOGs:
Come Meet my Kinsman Redeemer (thethirdheaventraveler.com)
The Bible shows us 7 Raptures (thethirdheaventraveler.com)
Let's talk Grammar and Trinity (thethirdheaventraveler.com)
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
ReplyDeleteJoh 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God.
Joh 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Joh 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
Joh 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
Joh 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
Joh 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Joh_20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.
Every scripture you've listed disproves the Trinity and certainly does NOT prove God the Son.
Delete