Refute Amir Tsarfati's blind ignorance regarding Pslam 83 and Psalm 120:5-7
King James Version
5 Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar!
6 My soul hath long dwelt with him that hateth peace.
7 I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.
King James Version
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
2. The courtiers and soldiers of Saul, and the generality of the Israelites, who, to curry favour with Saul, sought David’s ruin, and that many times by treachery and pretences of friendship; of which he oft complains in this book; whom as he elsewhere calls heathen, as Psalm 9:5 59:5, it is not strange if he compares them here to the savage Arabians. And amongst such persons David was oft forced to sojourn in Saul’s time, and with them he sought peace by all ways possible; but they hated peace, and the more he pursued peace, the more eagerly did they prosecute the war, as it here follows.
Here is another quote from him posted in his website:
"Many have contacted me recently asking if Israel’s current perilous situation could bring about the fulfillment of Psalm 83. I tell them no. Why? Primarily because Psalm 83 was already fulfilled 75 years ago.
The psalmist Asaph penned a prophetic song about a future time when countries would unite to wipe Israel from the face of the earth. He wrote:
Do not keep silent, O God!
Do not hold Your peace,
And do not be still, O God!
For behold, Your enemies make a tumult;
And those who hate You have lifted up their head.
They have taken crafty counsel against Your people,
And consulted together against Your sheltered ones.
They have said, “Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation,
That the name of Israel may be remembered no more.” (Psalm 83:1-4)
The rest of the Psalm goes on to mention the parties aligning against Israel and calls on God to supernaturally rescue His people from the coming assault. Many see the fulfillment of this prophecy in Israel’s current dangerous state. They hear voices calling for the destruction of the nation and read the reports of 250,000 missiles aimed across the borders into the country. On the surface, a prophetic fulfillment certainly seems plausible. However, when you closely examine the facts, it becomes evident that this cannot be the Psalm 83 war. There are three primary reasons why it is clear to me that Psalm 83 is not being fulfilled now but was already realized 75 years ago in 1948.
Psalm 83 is about ensuring that the name “Israel” remains in the dustbin of history. After suppressing the Bar Kokhba revolt in AD 136, the Romans were tired of Jewish uprisings. In an attempt to break down Jewish identity, Jerusalem was renamed Aelia Capitolina and Judea was renamed Syria Palestina. At that moment, the name of Israel disappeared, and it remained gone for over 1800 years. Then, suddenly, the State of Israel was created in a day on May 14, 1948. Immediately, the surrounding nations rose up against them. The name “Israel” had returned, but they were determined that it still “be remembered no more.”
The Timing
Psalm 83 is about a war, but that war took place 75 years ago. When the State of Israel was born, all the neighboring states armed themselves and attacked. What was their goal? They wanted to kill the baby before it had a chance to take its first breath. They wanted to “cut them off from being a nation.” At first, no one stood with Israel. Not even the American State Department believed that it should be recognized. But President Harry Truman surprised them all by being the first world leader to accept the existence of this newfound nation. I believe that America has received untold blessings from the Father because of this move. Despite the best efforts of Israel’s enemies, they were no match for an all-powerful God who was fulfilling His promises to the tiny nation. As in Psalm 83, the people called out for divine assistance, and it was given.
The Perpetrators
This is where today’s situation strays the farthest from Psalm 83. In the biblical prophecy, we read of nation after nation rising up against Israel. In 1948, Egypt, Transjordan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen all stood against the new state.
Most of the nations surrounding Israel despise Iran’s militias and the Islamic regime’s interference in their government and society. In fact, the leaders of these nations are speaking out against this potential attack. Lebanon’s Prime Minister Najib Mikati denounced any launch of rockets toward Israel from within his country. The Prime Minister of Iraq, Mohammed Shia’ Al-Sudani, strongly condemned the use of Iraqi territory to launch any regional aggressions at the behest of Iran.
Finally, if we look at a number of the specific nations mentioned, we see they just don’t fit the Psalm 83 scenario. Jordan and Egypt are mentioned in the prophecy using their biblical names. Currently, they both have peace treaties with Israel. Lebanon and Syria are also mentioned, yet today they are so dysfunctional that they are barely existing as sovereign, independent countries. In contrast to the others, Yemen isn’t mentioned at all in the prophecy, yet we still find it as part of the proxies that are threatening Israel. Psalm 83 is the gathering of the nations against Israel. What we see today is just one nation gathering its many militias against the country.
So, what is happening today? If anything, rather than an already fulfilled Psalm 83 being played out, I see a buildup to Ezekiel 38. Alliances are being made and weapons are being distributed in preparation for Russia, Iran, Turkey, and the others to finally trigger their attack. Am I saying this is the Ezekiel 38 war? No. Could it be related to it? I believe it is likely.
April 14th, 2023
ISHMAELITES – Father of Arabs generally
MOAB – Jordan (central part)
HAGRITES – Egypt
GEBAL – Lebanon
AMMON – Jordan (northern part)
AMALEK – Sinai area (Egypt)
PHILISTIA – Gaza area
TYRE – Lebanon
ASSYRIA – Parts of Syria and Iraq
Just look at these countries mentioned in Psalm 83 and match Amir's comments with these countries and their enmity against Israel. DOES HE NOT REALIZE GAZA? Syria? Iraq? Iraq wasn't even a major player in 1948. Gaza strip Philistia? HAMAS?
Psalm 83 King James Bible
Psalms 83:1
“(A Song or Psalm of Asaph.) Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.”
King James Version (KJV)
22 For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
33 They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.
55 For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:
66 The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes;
77 Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
88 Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah.
99 Do unto them as unto the Midianites; as to Sisera, as to Jabin, at the brook of Kison:
1010Which perished at Endor: they became as dung for the earth.
1111 Make their nobles like Oreb, and like Zeeb: yea, all their princes as Zebah, and as Zalmunna:
1212 Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession.
1313 O my God, make them like a wheel; as the stubble before the wind.
1414 As the fire burneth a wood, and as the flame setteth the mountains on fire;
1515 So persecute them with thy tempest, and make them afraid with thy storm.
1616 Fill their faces with shame; that they may seek thy name, O LORD.
1717 Let them be confounded and troubled for ever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish:
1818 That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.
Further, according to Salus, Israel will overcome this attack, ultimately engaging in a conquest of these nations, occupying them and vastly expanding her borders. According to Salus:
“Because of this Israeli conquest over the inner circle of the core surrounding Arab populations of Palestinians, Syrians, Saudi Arabians, Egyptians, Lebanese, and Jordanians, Israel’s borders are enlarged, prosperity increases, and national stature is enhanced.”
Of course, for those familiar with the region, the idea of Israel actually occupying Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Saudi Arabia is quite a wild, if not a completely impossible scenario to imagine. Yet many students of prophecy have fully accepted this story line and are even eagerly anticipating its imminent fulfillment.
While there are many problems with this interpretation, on both a practical as well as an exegetical basis, one of its most glaring problems is that some of the key nations identified by Salus are simply are not supportable by the historical or biblical record.
The first nation not included in the Psalm 83 coalition is Egypt.
- Timing and Nature: The blog argues Psalm 83 depicts a supernatural judgment during the Tribulation (Time of Jacob’s Trouble), not a pre-Rapture war. It cites phrases like “whirl (of dust or chaff)” (Psalm 83:14, Isaiah 17:13) to suggest divine, not human, destruction, contrasting with Tsarfati’s view of an imminent military conflict. The author links this to Jeremiah 30:7 and other scriptures (Zechariah 9, 12; Isaiah 13, 34; Joel 2; Matthew 7, 24) that describe the Day of the Lord.
- Peace and Security: The blog suggests the devastating events of Psalm 83 during the Tribulation will lead to a global cry for “peace and safety,” paving the way for the Antichrist’s covenant with Israel (Daniel 9:27). This aligns with 1 Thessalonians 5:3: “For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them” (KJV).
- Criticism of Tsarfati: The author accuses Tsarfati of promoting a Zionist narrative, misinterpreting Psalm 83 as a pre-Tribulation war, and downplaying the supernatural aspect of God’s judgment. The blog emphasizes the KJV as the final authority and claims Tsarfati’s use of other translations leads to error.
- Context of Jacob’s Trouble: The blog ties Psalm 83 to the Tribulation, where Israel faces severe trials but is ultimately saved (Jeremiah 30:7). It rejects the idea of Israel nuking its enemies pre-Rapture, arguing this misaligns with the scriptural timeline of the Second Advent and Armageddon.
- Joseph S. Exell (The Biblical Illustrator, 1905-1909)
- Overview: Exell views Psalm 83 as a prophetic prayer by Asaph against a coalition of nations conspiring to destroy Israel (Psalm 83:4: “Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation”). He sees it as both historical (reflecting Israel’s conflicts with neighbors) and prophetic, applicable to future enemies of God’s people, including the church.
- Prophetic Context: Exell suggests the psalm’s prayer for the destruction of Israel’s enemies is a prophecy of their doom, fulfilled historically in David’s victories and potentially in future eschatological events. He notes the confederacy’s goal to erase Israel mirrors end-times hostility, possibly during the Tribulation.
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: While Exell doesn’t explicitly tie Psalm 83 to the Time of Jacob’s Trouble, his emphasis on God’s judgment aligns with the blog’s view of divine intervention. He cites Psalm 83:9-11, which calls for enemies to be treated like Midianites or Sisera, as a plea for supernatural deliverance.
- Peace and Security: Exell doesn’t directly address “peace and security,” but his focus on God’s ultimate victory suggests a resolution that could precede a false peace, aligning with the blog’s Antichrist covenant theory.
- Kameel Majdali (Christians for Israel International, 2024)
- Overview: Majdali interprets Psalm 83 as a potential prophecy of a “last-day invasion” by Israel’s neighbors (minus Egypt) to annihilate the nation (Psalm 83:4). He notes the absence of Egypt, possibly due to the 1979 peace treaty, and sees the psalm as relevant to modern conflicts.
- Prophetic Context: Majdali considers Psalm 83 distinct from Ezekiel 38-39 (Gog and Magog) and other end-times wars, suggesting it could describe a coordinated attack by nations like Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. He acknowledges debate over whether it was fulfilled in 1948 or 1967 but leans toward a future fulfillment.
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: Majdali connects Psalm 83 to Israel’s future trials, implicitly linked to the Time of Jacob’s Trouble (Jeremiah 30:7), as he references Daniel 9:24 and other end-times passages. He suggests the invasion’s failure leads to God’s glory, potentially setting the stage for a deceptive peace.
- Peace and Security: While not explicitly citing 1 Thessalonians 5:3, Majdali’s mention of the Abraham Accords and ongoing regional tensions implies a context where peace agreements could precede further conflict, aligning with the blog’s view of a false peace under the Antichrist.
- Joel C. Rosenberg (Various Sources, Implied via Third Heaven Traveler)
- Overview: The blog criticizes Rosenberg, a prominent prophecy teacher, for supporting Tsarfati’s views and promoting the Abraham Accords as a step toward peace. Rosenberg’s work often frames Psalm 83 as a precursor to Ezekiel 38-39, potentially occurring before the Tribulation.
- Prophetic Context: Rosenberg sees Psalm 83 as a distinct war where Israel’s immediate neighbors attempt to destroy it, possibly setting the stage for the Gog-Magog war. He differs from the blog by suggesting a pre-Tribulation fulfillment, which the blog rejects as unscriptural.
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: Rosenberg connects Psalm 83 indirectly to the Tribulation by suggesting it creates conditions for the Antichrist’s rise, but he doesn’t explicitly place it within Jacob’s Trouble, unlike the blog’s firm stance.
- Peace and Security: Rosenberg’s advocacy for the Abraham Accords (criticized in the blog) implies a belief in temporary peace agreements, which could align with the “peace and safety” cry before sudden destruction, though he doesn’t directly cite this verse.
- Bill Salus (Psalm 83: The Missing Prophecy Revealed)
- Overview: Salus, referenced in scholarly discussions, argues Psalm 83 predicts a specific pre-Tribulation war where Israel’s neighbors (Edom, Ishmaelites, Moab, etc.) attack to eradicate it. He sees this as distinct from Ezekiel 38-39 and a precursor to Israel dwelling securely (Ezekiel 38:8).
- Prophetic Context: Salus identifies the nations in Psalm 83:6-8 with modern Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Palestinian territories. He believes Israel’s victory in this war allows it to burn weapons for seven years (Ezekiel 39:9), suggesting a pre-Tribulation event.
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: Unlike the blog, Salus places Psalm 83 before the Tribulation, arguing it sets the stage for Israel’s temporary security and the Antichrist’s covenant. This directly contradicts the blog’s view of a Tribulation-era supernatural judgment.
- Peace and Security: Salus’s theory supports the idea that a Psalm 83 victory leads to a false sense of security, aligning with 1 Thessalonians 5:3, though he doesn’t explicitly connect it to Jacob’s Trouble as the blog does.
- David Guzik (Enduring Word Commentary)
- Overview: Guzik views Psalm 83 as an imprecatory psalm where Asaph prays for God’s judgment on a confederacy of nations seeking Israel’s destruction. He sees it as both historical and potentially prophetic, reflecting ongoing hostility toward God’s people.
- Prophetic Context: Guzik doesn’t commit to a specific eschatological timeline but acknowledges Psalm 83’s relevance to end-times scenarios, given its depiction of a coalition against Israel. He notes the psalm’s call for divine intervention (Psalm 83:1: “Keep not thou silence, O God”).
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: Guzik doesn’t explicitly link Psalm 83 to the Time of Jacob’s Trouble, but his emphasis on God’s supernatural judgment aligns with the blog’s view of divine, not human, action during the Tribulation.
- Peace and Security: Guzik doesn’t address this directly, but his commentary on God’s deliverance suggests a resolution that could precede a deceptive peace, consistent with the blog’s perspective.
- Amir Tsarfati (Behold Israel, 2023)
- Overview: Tsarfati, critiqued heavily in the blog, argues Psalm 83 was fulfilled in 1948 during Israel’s War of Independence, when neighboring nations attacked the newly formed state. He contrasts this with current conflicts, which he sees as a buildup to Ezekiel 38-39.
- Prophetic Context: Tsarfati views Psalm 83 as historical, not a future event, citing the involvement of nations like Egypt (absent in Psalm 83) in 1948. He focuses on Iran’s proxies today as precursors to Gog-Magog, not Psalm 83.
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: Tsarfati places Ezekiel 38-39, not Psalm 83, closer to the Tribulation, contradicting the blog’s view that Psalm 83 occurs during Jacob’s Trouble as a divine judgment.
- Peace and Security: Tsarfati’s emphasis on current Middle East tensions and peace treaties (e.g., Abraham Accords) suggests a trajectory toward a false peace, aligning with the blog’s “peace and safety” theme, though he attributes this to post-Psalm 83 developments.
- Alignment with Third Heaven Traveler: The blog’s view that Psalm 83 is a Tribulation-era supernatural judgment aligns with Exell and Guzik, who emphasize divine intervention over human warfare. Majdali’s openness to a future fulfillment also partially supports the blog, though he doesn’t explicitly place it in the Tribulation. The blog’s rejection of a pre-Tribulation Psalm 83 war directly opposes Salus and Tsarfati, who see it as a distinct, earlier event.
- Time of Jacob’s Trouble: The blog’s connection of Psalm 83 to the Time of Jacob’s Trouble (Jeremiah 30:7) is supported by scriptures like Zechariah 12 and Joel 2, which describe Israel’s trials and deliverance during the Day of the Lord. However, scholars like Salus and Tsarfati argue for a pre-Tribulation war, which the blog dismisses as unscriptural, citing the KJV’s clarity on the Day of the Lord’s timing.
- Peace and Security: The blog’s assertion that Psalm 83’s devastation leads to a cry for “peace and safety” (1 Thessalonians 5:3) is plausible, as the Tribulation’s chaos could prompt such a response, ushering in the Antichrist’s covenant (Daniel 9:27). Majdali and Salus indirectly support this by noting peace treaties or security following regional conflicts, though they differ on timing.
- KJV Emphasis: The blog’s insistence on the KJV as the final authority is a point of contention, as scholars like Guzik and Exell use it but don’t reject other translations. The blog’s criticism of Tsarfati’s use of non-KJV texts reflects a niche dispensationalist stance, which may limit its scholarly acceptance but resonates with KJV-only advocates.
- Critique of Tsarfati: The blog’s accusations of Tsarfati’s Zionist agenda and scriptural mishandling are not directly addressed by other scholars, but Tsarfati’s own writings () clarify his view of Psalm 83 as historical, not future, which contradicts the blog’s eschatology. The blog’s personal attacks on Tsarfati may weaken its credibility among broader audiences.
Most importantly regarding Psalm 120 which I failed to discuss is although David is talking about himself as a Sojourner amongst his own people, in reality, this along with many of David's writings in Psalm is a PROPHETIC TYPE of Jesus Christ NOT accepted by his own. He came to His own and His own received Him NOT. John 1:11
ReplyDeleteKing James Version
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
Amir Tsarfati left me with the undeniable perception that he is AGAINST the King James Bible once in an interview on Youtube. It was a livestream and questions were coming through the comments live. He picked one out which condemned the new versions when he suddenly got ANGRY at the commenter. His demeanor changed completely then and there. It was creepy. I was prepared for him to begin uttering profanity he was so angry. I thought to myself, what in the world is he getting so angry about? That God preserved His ONLY written word for the English speaking people of the last days of the age of Grace and He preserved only ONE written word? Or that he was guilty of defending it?
ReplyDeleteThat has stuck with me since first hearing it. Also, as I learn and grow in God’s Grace and Knowledge, I keep finding MORE and CRITICAL changes that the new versions all stick to and which change the meaning of the text substantially. For example, in Revelation 1:6 KJV, "And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father..." God AND HIS FATHER. Or, Jesus Christ (God) and His Father, correct?
Look at the NIV: "unto His God and Father". All of the new versions do this except the Berean (as far as I could see). There are thousands more like this in the counterfeits. This is just another stamp of GUILT that the so-called "modern" versions COUNTERFEIT God's written word! Why are so many people who Name the Name which is above every name and claim to be lovers of TRUTH, not only overlook the controversies of the new versions (which I'm certain they know about) but CONDEMN those who point them out???
Many high profile Christian speakers in this age neglect that God's ONLY written word, which He has preserved by His Own HAND has been counterfeited so very many times and moreover USED as doctrine, dogmatically defending them against the only REAL written word. Every year, more counterfeits are published by wicked publishing companies like Zondervan, owned by HarperCollins which is owned by the evil media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
They are traded in the world market for filthy lucre; entire empires built with the proceeds. God's written word, the KJV Bible is FREE for the masses and was never intended to draw a profit, only souls. HarperCollins is the publishing company which prints THE SATANIC RITUALS which roll off the presses to the wicked. How can God's written word exist side by side in such wickedness? Answer: It can't. This is a continuous dilemma for me when hearing good teachers use corrupt versions and it compels me to ask the question, why?
Thank you for your comment. Yes, you wouldn't believe how many lost children defend and attack me for calling out Amir whose name in Arabic means PRINCE or RULER. The fake Jew of the synagogue of Satan. He and his kind are lost blind guides of the Laodicean Church leading the blind into a pit.
Delete